We're campaigning for a secondary school system with fair admissions & no more 11-plus. Children are more likely to succeed in high quality all-ability schools.

United Kingdom
Joined December 2011
Is the 11-plus system 'rigged against poorer pupils?' Pass rates in poorer areas are significantly lower. Pupils attending private schools achieve the highest pass rate of any group. Expensive test tuition is commonplace. Why do we allow this inequality? kentonline.co.uk/kent/news/k…
11
3
3
605
Thousands of Kent children learn today if they're 'grammar school standard'. Families face huge stress over this verdict. Yet Medway proposes letting more children pass next year to fit school places. Has children's 'ability' changed, or just the goalposts?kentonline.co.uk/medway/news…
1
2
1
174
So much pressure to win a grammar school place, and to live up to expectations if you attend one. Research shows grammar schools don't get better results. As this article shows, it shouldn't be presumed that the teaching will be higher quality. inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/…
2
3
154
Academies of various sizes, foundation schools, city technology colleges, local authorities that manage anywhere between 1 and 500 schools. Our school system is chaotic and structures matter for important details like place planning and admissions. tes.com/magazine/analysis/ge…
4
5
297
Comprehensive Future retweeted
On September 29th 2026 Andy Burnham gave his first conference speech as Labour prime minister. He called himself "the son of a man who failed his 11-plus." His father, Roy, had died of Alzheimer's disease a few weeks earlier, earlier that month, in fact. "If only, if only he had been able to appreciate that moment," Burnham told the hall. He "could have gone to university himself", but "it wasn't an option". England is supposed to have gotten rid of the sorting of children by exam decades ago. But the country still has 163 grammar schools, state schools that select pupils by test. In Buckinghamshire four out of ten children of secondary-school age go to one. In 1998 their number was frozen by law. On the only occasion on which a community has voted on whether to end selection, in Ripon in 2000, the people chose to retain it, by 1,493 votes to 747. Children take the test in September of their last year of primary school, when most are ten. In Buckinghamshire they are told to take two HB pencils and an eraser in a transparent bag. A practice question asks children to identify a hidden four-letter word in "The film ended happily after all". The answer is "mend". This has nothing to do with the national curriculum, and Kent's primary schools are told not to teach it. So families hire tutors. In London they charge £80-90 an hour (120) and can cost up to £15,000 ($20,000) over the years. Vanessa Kushner, who has been a tutor for 30 years, says she gets calls about kids "aged three to seven" all the time. Katheryn Sharp, who has tutored for over 20 years, calls the preparation "Olympic training". "Any Year 5 who goes away during the summer holidays is out of their mind," she says (children are nine in Year 5). A study of children in England and Northern Ireland by UCL found that around 70% of tutored children got into a grammar school, compared with 14% of those who did not use a tutor. In Kent just 12% of children eligible for free school meals pass the test, compared with 30% of their peers. At the Henrietta Barnett School, in north London, there was a year when 2,944 girls took the test for 100 places. The exam that Roy Burnham failed is now mostly a test of parental wealth. The younger Mr Burnham promised to "rebuild a system of comprehensive education" in his speech. He did not mention grammar schools, and his government has not proposed changing the law that keeps them alive. In 2023 about 17,000 children in Kent took the exam his father did.
2
3
41
1,863
Comprehensive Future retweeted
Educators ? and parents would you agree ?
“The son of a man who failed the 11-plus becoming Prime Minister.” A moving line from Andy Burnham today, and a reminder that no test at 10 or 11 should be allowed to limit a child’s future. Comprehensive education opens opportunity. Selection rations it.theguardian.com/politics/liv…
1
1
64
Comprehensive Future retweeted
Don't miss out! Book your tickets for this year's CASE conference: "Why are so many children unhappy at school? And what we can do about it." 📅 Saturday 10th October 🕙 10am to 4pm 📍London Greenwich 🎟️ campaignforstateeducation.or…
1
1
33
“The son of a man who failed the 11-plus becoming Prime Minister.” A moving line from Andy Burnham today, and a reminder that no test at 10 or 11 should be allowed to limit a child’s future. Comprehensive education opens opportunity. Selection rations it.theguardian.com/politics/liv…
3
6
1
34
2,965
Comprehensive Future retweeted
But Nuala Burgess, chair of the campaign group @comp_future, said: “If @Ofstednews is giving a gold star for #inclusion to schools that exclude most local children, they clearly don’t understand the meaning of the word.” #grammarschool #ofsted #SEND #ehcp schoolsweek.co.uk/grammar-sc…
1
1
89
Comprehensive Future retweeted
In my latest @NewStatesman column, I cast my mind back two decades to ask why immigrant children began to dominate grammar schools. Lots of people talk about the experience of failing the 11+...but in some ways it's passing that I still haven't got over! newstatesman.com/politics/ed…
1
15
55
4,452
Grammar schools’ results cannot be separated from the pupils they select. Major new QUB research finds that differences in outcomes are largely attributable to pupil intake—not school effectiveness—and calls for an end to high-stakes selection at 10 and 11.comprehensivefuture.org.uk/a…
12
5
17
878
A major new study finds academic selection at 10–11: • reinforces inequality • puts children under pressure • narrows the primary curriculum • offers little evidence of improved social mobility Selection concentrates advantage. It doesn’t create it. belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/…
4
13
1
16
928
Replying to @comp_future
It was also rigged. 55% of girl passed but only 50% got in. The acceptance to grammar schools varied accross the country because the provision varied. Ultimately and nationally, there was no equal yardstick for all children in any given year.
2
2
36
664
Grammar schools do NOT have an intake representative of their local area. This is the problem. Funny that some sectors of the press only notice when it's about ethnicity. Why do they never shout about the low numbers of disadvantaged and SEND pupils? gbnews.com/news/grammar-scho…
2
8
1
15
1,218
"The 11 plus was unfair because it consisted of a single test, taken on a single day, at the end of primary school." Abigail failed the test in 1970, but more than 50 years later, children are still being divided by a one-off test. abigailsheppard.substack.com…
8
11
1
19
1,952
'The uncomfortable truth for education policymakers is that high-performing schools rarely pass exams on their own - families pass them.' A thoughtful article about the subtle ways schools use admissions to admit pupils with the 'right' sort of parents. tes.com/magazine/analysis/se…
1
5
11
284
Comprehensive Future retweeted
“Grammar schools actually lower standards” Carl challenges one of the central arguments used to defend selective education. He says areas with grammar schools have lower average attainment and GCSE pass rates and argues that even academically stronger pupils don’t necessarily benefit from attending them. Does selection raise standards or damage education across the wider area? 👇 #teaching #schools #education #teacherlife #teachertok #teachersoftiktok
5
2
2
2,131