* Designing the Holochain ecosystem to avoid the capture of the commons wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Holoc… Cameron Burgess: "Capture is not caused by bad actors; it is what happens when you build a centre and run capital through it. A mission held inside an ordinary company can be sold with the company; a business that lives on transaction fees or token appreciation is pulled, over time, back toward extraction. So Holo Ventures is a mission-protected commercial entity — owned by the Foundation and bound by constitutional safeguards designed to hold its mission integrity regardless of how large it grows. The protocol stays in the commons; the commercial entity is structurally constrained from becoming the thing this paper warns against. We are not asking you to trust that we will resist the pull toward a centre. We have tried to make it structurally impossible for us to drift there — the protocol is open and forkable whatever we do. The obvious comparison is OpenAI — also founded as a non-profit around a mission, with a capped-profit structure meant to keep commercial upside in check. In 2023, its board’s authority was overridden within days of the one time it tried to use it. By 2025, the profit cap was gone and the fundraising limits lifted.52 The non-profit still holds nominal control and a large stake, and reasonable people argue that’s enough — but the point is simpler than who’s right: governance you can renegotiate is not the same as architecture you can’t. Caps get raised and charters rewritten when the cheque is large enough. An open protocol cannot be un-opened. The final safeguard is the one the original Green Paper named: you can run Holochain without us. That is the role we intend to play. The Foundation keeps the protocol free; Holo Ventures makes the values-aligned economy commercially real — building the software, operating the infrastructure, and earning by delivering it rather than by owning the networks that run on it. The work ahead is to put this into the hands of the people the mainstream system was never built to serve — the regenerative finance projects, the community currency organisers, the mutual aid networks, the cooperative enterprises, the impact organisations, and the developers who want to run AI locally without feeding a surveillance stack. Those are the builders. But the unit this architecture ultimately answers to is smaller and more universal than any of them: the individual. Agent-centric infrastructure pushes sovereignty all the way down to the person — which means its real constituency is anyone who would rather not watch money and influence concentrate, year after year, at their expense. Which is to say, most of us. The work keeps moving, and we’ve learned not to turn that into a roadmap. So, as directions rather than commitments: we’re working to ensure Holochain applications run wherever people already are — in the browser with no installation, and on mobile and desktop as easily as any other app. The decentralisation has to reach the layer people actually touch; an alternative almost no one can practically use is not yet an alternative. And we’re building the runtime that lets agents operate on the network. The same architecture that lets a person own their data lets an AI agent run on infrastructure its owner controls — and settle in mutual credit, not on the payment rails the incumbents are racing to own before the agent economy has even arrived. We’re not in that race. We don’t need to own this economy — we just need it to exist, and to be impossible to capture once it does." (decent.holoventures.io/09-st…)