Code, AI, Glitch. Hand-crafting bugs since before AI could do it for me. Want the best AI tools + workflows + Vibe Coding? Join skool 👇

Arizona | Matrix
Joined April 2018
CodeGlitch retweeted
codex users, are you staying, switching to claude code or paying for both? I am switching to claude code + grok bot, the windows app is still too buggy for me and the usage is soso...
3
2
4
461
CodeGlitch retweeted
For everyone using Grok Bot, how is your usage? I've blown my weekly usage in 6-8 hours for the $100 plan, 5% of the $200 plan in under 1 hour. People really running teams with Grok Bot, including building?
303
6
8
285
48,279
CodeGlitch retweeted
We paid for X's new Premium plan and gave Grok Bot and Cursor the same real build, checked by 14 hidden tests. Both passed. Grok Bot took about a third less time that day. Here's what each plan includes, the $30 catch, and which plan you need.
🤖 Made with AI
1
2
4
203
CodeGlitch retweeted
OpenAI is struggling with compute since Monday there has been interruptions of sessions running, now they reduced the limit of requests you can make before hitting the rate limit Codex has loads of bugs, OpenAI models have fallen behind and to top it up infra/compute limitations
1
1
2
447
CodeGlitch retweeted
Am I the only one having problems with Chatgpt/Codex all day? Model at capacity, interruptions without reasons, etc... As if UX wasnt bad enough
2
2
214
CodeGlitch retweeted
Anthropic is mogging OpenAI so hard it’s not even funny anymore 🚨 Astra cooked by Fable (Opus might be in on it too) Sol 6.1 cooked by Opus 5.5 Terra cooked by Sonnet (and no one cares about Terra) Luna cooked by Haiku Whole lineup folded 💀
Claude Haiku 5.5, our latest model:
2
2
4
217
CodeGlitch retweeted
Nano Banana 2.1 is out and you can use it on your favorite Platforms already ... 👀 🧊 4k looks great and it seems to be perfect for UGC
🤖 Made with AI
Nano Banana 2.1 is here! This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in: - visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking imagery Try it now in @GeminiApp, @GoogleAIStudio, and more.
1
1
6
760
CodeGlitch retweeted
Nano Banana 2.1 is out and its perfect for UGC content 🪩🦩 Testing Skin, Texture and realism Test 3 here we go! Looks stunningly real if you ask me - all in 4K
🤖 Made with AI
Nano Banana 2.1 is here! This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in: - visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking imagery Try it now in @GeminiApp, @GoogleAIStudio, and more.
1
2
1
16
857
CodeGlitch retweeted
Nano Banana 2.1 is out! Testing Skin, Texture and realism Test 2 here we go - in 4k Looks stunningly real if you ask me it´s cheaper and better than Nano Banana Pro
🤖 Made with AI
Nano Banana 2.1 is here! This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in: - visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking imagery Try it now in @GeminiApp, @GoogleAIStudio, and more.
2
4
207
CodeGlitch retweeted
Nano Banana 2.1 is out! Testing Skin, Texture and realism Test 1 here we go! Looks stunningly real if you ask me
🤖 Made with AI
Nano Banana 2.1 is here! This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in: - visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking imagery Try it now in @GeminiApp, @GoogleAIStudio, and more.
2
3
1
20
2,830
CodeGlitch retweeted
Who is better at motion design - Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5 ? I created this one with Opus 5.5 but will test it against Sonnet 5.5 to see who does better! Great Video for product Launch
🤖 Made with AI
2
3
1
7
421
CodeGlitch retweeted
I was a OpenAI fan, until they butchered codex and their models... DevDay better deliver big, like really big... Anyway, what Tibo really said: turned “we’re cutting the API equivalent allowance in half” into “you’re getting more value.” Sol and Luna get 50% cheaper. The allowance gets halved. On those models, those changes cancel out. That is not evidence of “more work done.” And “better than a month ago” is a convenient comparison. I’m not questioning whether your models improved (they didn't). I’m questioning whether the subscription got worse. Compare the SAME models doing the SAME work under the old and new rules. That’s the comparison missing from this announcement. Lower prices with the old allowance would pass the savings on. Cutting the allowance at the same time takes that benefit back. You’re allowed to make the deal less generous. Just don’t sell it as a favor. Especially when the reduction is something you can quantify today, but the compensation is something we’re supposed to applaud before you’ve even announced it. You're paying $200 for the product, not the teaser.
Tibo
@thsottiauxSep 29
Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo
1
3
6
330
CodeGlitch retweeted
I can confirm that open ai pro 20x plan had it’s usage reduced in the last few days. First few days of Sol 6 usage barely registered, now it flies
Salio
@Mr_SalioSep 27
🚨 OPENAI Has a big problem OpenAI appears to have quietly removed the 5× and 20× usage labels from its Pro plans Previously: > $100 Pro = 5× more usage than Plus > $200 Pro = 20× more usage than Plus Now both simply say: “More usage than Plus” OpenAI’s own help page still describes the tiers as 5× and 20×, so the UI change is especially interesting Why is OpenAI so bad at being transparent It’s not the first time they’ve done something like this??
2
4
316
CodeGlitch retweeted
No code freeze explains why openai ships bugs on top of bugs, and later reintroduces bugs that had already been patched
Tibo
@thsottiauxSep 27
Code freeze isn’t really a thing anymore before releases and in the future the code might even be generated online per request according to some constraints.
2
2
197
CodeGlitch retweeted
This openai/codex/chatgpt bug has been open on github since august "I cant speak, because if I speak I am in big trouble..."
OpenAI cant launch a update without breaking ChatGPT/Codex truly amazing user experience
1
2
1
5
1,008
CodeGlitch retweeted
OpenAI cant launch a update without breaking ChatGPT/Codex truly amazing user experience
OpenAI wins, cancelling a few pro 20x subscriptions after weeks of struggle with harness... On top of the harness: - adding 50% cheaper models but also 50% slower/dumber to the complaint list...
2
2
1
6
1,140
CodeGlitch retweeted
Opus 5.5 is really good for animations, for minimal credits usage on your CLAUDE plan. No video Model needed to create this kind of animations. With the Claude API it would cost $6.91, with your subscription its just a few cents! Physics on point! It even generated the sound 😳
🤖 Made with AI
2
3
1
12
1,139
CodeGlitch retweeted
I tried @Ror_Fly cool Prompt for this one.. I am actually a bit impressed.. all animations done with Opus 5.5 without any other connectors! reference image was generated with ChatGpt Image 2 Cheers Rory!
🤖 Made with AI
Opus 5.5 rendered this in HTML from (1) image 🤯 Things are getting weird. PROMPT: We're going to try a little test. Do you think you could render a recipe motion graphic animation using javascript or html (w/e you think will produce the best) to show the full recipe from start to finish (empty glass to completed cocktail) - Explainer video style - Showing the recipe ingreidents + measurements as they're going into the cup. Should be a 30s video.
3
1
10
2,052
CodeGlitch retweeted
OpenAI wins, cancelling a few pro 20x subscriptions after weeks of struggle with harness... On top of the harness: - adding 50% cheaper models but also 50% slower/dumber to the complaint list...
Annoying ChatGPT - Codex bugs: - still has a regression that opens CMD briefly and interrupting whatever you're interacting with or typing - latest version stalls within a few minutes of sending a prompt "thinking" or similar... This is why I have to recommend Codex CLI
2
1
6
951
CodeGlitch retweeted
I spent the weekend creating a workflow to automate an ad 😄 Script & assets were 100% AI generated connecting Claude to @runwayml. I manually stitched, scored, and finished the edit. Want to try Runway? Get 25% off any new plan using code LOUDENIM25 Here’s the 1st attempt 👇 #runway #aivideo
1
1
6
312