Feminist, proud mum & gran. European. Made in Yorkshire. Atheist. Pandemic tweeter! Politics, food, gardening, music. #RejoinEU

London, Europe
Joined January 2010
As children don't get to choose their parents, they should never, ever be punished for the parents' shortcomings. It is these children that are most in need of society's help.
4
8
1
46
В 1994 году США, Россия и Украина подписали соглашение об отказе Украины от ядерного оружия. Украина отдала 4 400 ядерных боеголовок. Взамен США и Россия гарантировали Украине «независимость и существующие границы». Спустя 30 лет один гарант напал, а другой требует капитуляции
1,344
9,250
532
23,410
629,025
Bill Clinton: “I’m tired of the way we treat our allies like dirt. And just last week, President Trump finally did what he threatened to do when he first ran, which is to abandon Ukraine and embrace Vladimir Putin all over again.” I hope the American people are also tired of it
635
6,701
131
33,424
520,522
I guess BBC impartiality only matters when you're a match of the day presenter who says bombing children is bad
“[Saying] ‘Zionism is racism’ is offensive, it’s antisemitic and it’s dangerous” Broadcaster Jo Coburn says she “watched in horror” as the Green Party passed its motion on Zionism and criticises leader Zack Polanski's defence in his #BBCLauraK interview bbc.co.uk/news/live/c64gv8k2…
49
583
6
4,436
60,409
🚨Another one to add to the ever increasing list of people in Reform UK that apparently have never met Nigel Farage. And an ever increasing list of people Farage will supposedly be suing.
2
18
58
932
Chrysha retweeted
President Trump’s decision to waive sanctions against Russia as Putin continues his brutal war of aggression against Ukraine dishonors the legacy of the late Senator Lindsey Graham and is decidedly not in the national interests of the United States and should be reversed. Putin is a war criminal and only understands strength. Waiving Graham Act sanctions on Russia signals weakness at a moment that demands American strength. Now is the time to stand strong against Russian aggression, just as we did during the years of the first Trump Administration. A victory in Ukraine would be a victory for freedom and is squarely in the national interests of the United States. If Putin overruns Ukraine, I have no doubt it will only be a matter of time until Russia’s military crosses a border that our troops will have to deal with him. For the cause of freedom, for America’s national security and that of our allies including Ukraine, President Trump should Restore sanctions under the Graham Act immediately, Rescind the diesel deal with Russia and Rally our Allies to ensure Ukraine has the military support it needs to repel and defeat this Russian invasion once and for all. Slava Ukraini🇺🇸🇺🇦wsj.com/politics/policy/trum…
1,832
4,797
315
22,081
529,726
Replying to @Justsn00zing
I would like to ensure nothing like this can ever take place again. Where PMs are ousted and no Member consultation. I want to ensure the MPs who turned are never swayed again, who realise what they’ve done and call for a proper leadership election where more than Burnham stands
1
2
5
74
Every country that joins the EU gets richer. This is a documented stone cold fact. Every country that leaves the EU gets poorer. This is a documented stone cold fact and should have been obvious to everyone with a working brain stem.
546
274
29
977
27,528
Young Alexander posted this apology late at night so thought I'd help him to get it seen by more people by sharing with all of you
59
1,854
14
5,623
95,738
Replying to @BBCNewsnight
Could we maybe have some academics? Some deep thinkers? Some serious conversation? Or just the right wing son of the owner of GB News? What even is this booking?
10
17
305
8,579
"Thames Water asks for £2.4bn more to avoid going bust this year or early 2027" They are environmentally insolvent and this isn't sustainable. Our bills will increase to pay for this. Let them go bust and take them back. theguardian.com/business/202…
5
43
64
1,566
Replying to @miffythegamer
And for what purpose?? He resigned. He’s dead. Cambridge still has only 1% black professors - there’s no “over representation” of black men and women. What is it they want to “investigate”?
2
1
14
461
I thank His Majesty King Charles III for the audience. It is important for me to have the opportunity to personally thank him for his unwavering support for Ukraine. We appreciate all the assistance provided by the United Kingdom. 🇺🇦 🇬🇧 @RoyalFamily Pictures are by Aaron Chown from Press Association.
2,274
8,601
378
66,551
703,747
Hey @Ofcom - do you still exist?
I just absolutely despair at the bullshit GB News pukes out to the gullible. Honest Bob Jenrick's claim that "4 in 5 new jobs were taken by migrants" is misleading. Jenrick's claim rests on a calculation by the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), the right-wing think tank founded and chaired by Iain Duncan Smith, which funding-transparency site Who Funds You? gave a D grade, the second-lowest transparency rating, in September 2023. It was then amplified by the Telegraph. While the basic arithmetic roughly holds, at each step the claim drifts further from what the data shows. 1. They are not "new jobs". The figure compares HMRC payroll counts in December 2014 and December 2025. That is a net change, not a count of jobs created. Millions of jobs open and close every year, and most are filled by UK nationals. In fact, people who were non-UK citizens when they registered for National Insurance held 20% of employee jobs in December 2025, up from 12% in 2014. Four in five payroll jobs are still held by UK nationals. 2. The numbers don't relate to individual people. The data counts payrolled employments, so one person with two jobs is counted twice. The Telegraph's own chart says as much. 3. Many of the "migrants" are British. HMRC records nationality once, when someone first registers for National Insurance, and naturalisation is not recorded. Someone who arrived in 2015 and became a British citizen in 2021 is still a "migrant" in this data. HMRC itself says this makes non-UK figures higher than the true counts. 4. "Taken" implies displacement the data cannot show. The CSJ says jobs "went to" non-UK nationals. Jenrick says they were "taken". The figures show who holds jobs, not whether anyone lost out. The Migration Advisory Committee found that, across all immigrants over the full period studied, there was no statistically significant impact of migration on employment. 5. The time frame drives the result. By the Telegraph's own chart, UK nationals accounted for roughly half the payroll growth between 2014 and 2019. The "one in five" figure depends on the 2021 to 2023 visa surge, which happened under the Conservative government in which Jenrick himself was Immigration Minister. 6. Self-employment is excluded. PAYE data leaves out roughly four million self-employed people, so it does not measure all work. In short, a narrow payroll statistic, which counts employments rather than people and permanently labels naturalised Britons as migrants, has become a claim about "new jobs" being "taken". The underlying data supports neither word. This fits a familiar Reform pattern: take a statistic, often from an opaquely funded right-wing think tank, strip away its caveats, and recast it as proof that migrants are taking something from “the British people”. Whatever the intent, the effect is the same: a narrow, heavily qualified finding becomes a story of grievance and resentment. It's wrong, divisive, misleading and pathetic.
6
89
1
192
2,550
Trump and Musk are doing everything they can to try and force Ukraine to surrender to Putin while Musk spends over $300 million to try and buy the midterm elections to maintain total power. The American government under Republicans are on the side of evil. Vote them out.
200
3,191
97
8,648
69,081
Honest Bob Jenrick's claim that "4 in 5 new jobs were taken by migrants" is misleading. Jenrick's claim rests on a calculation by the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), the right-wing think tank founded and chaired by Iain Duncan Smith, which funding-transparency site Who Funds You? gave a D grade, the second-lowest transparency rating, in September 2023. It was then amplified by the Telegraph. While the basic arithmetic roughly holds, at each step the claim drifts further from what the data shows. 1. They are not "new jobs". The figure compares HMRC payroll counts in December 2014 and December 2025. That is a net change, not a count of jobs created. Millions of jobs open and close every year, and most are filled by UK nationals. In fact, people who were non-UK citizens when they registered for National Insurance held 20% of employee jobs in December 2025, up from 12% in 2014. Four in five payroll jobs are still held by UK nationals. 2. The numbers don't relate to individual people. The data counts payrolled employments, so one person with two jobs is counted twice. The Telegraph's own chart says as much. 3. Many of the "migrants" are British. HMRC records nationality once, when someone first registers for National Insurance, and naturalisation is not recorded. Someone who arrived in 2015 and became a British citizen in 2021 is still a "migrant" in this data. HMRC itself says this makes non-UK figures higher than the true counts. 4. "Taken" implies displacement the data cannot show. The CSJ says jobs "went to" non-UK nationals. Jenrick says they were "taken". The figures show who holds jobs, not whether anyone lost out. The Migration Advisory Committee found that, across all immigrants over the full period studied, there was no statistically significant impact of migration on employment. 5. The time frame drives the result. By the Telegraph's own chart, UK nationals accounted for roughly half the payroll growth between 2014 and 2019. The "one in five" figure depends on the 2021 to 2023 visa surge, which happened under the Conservative government in which Jenrick himself was Immigration Minister. 6. Self-employment is excluded. PAYE data leaves out roughly four million self-employed people, so it does not measure all work. In short, a narrow payroll statistic, which counts employments rather than people and permanently labels naturalised Britons as migrants, has become a claim about "new jobs" being "taken". The underlying data supports neither word. This fits a familiar Reform pattern: take a statistic, often from an opaquely funded right-wing think tank, strip away its caveats, and recast it as proof that migrants are taking something from “the British people”. Whatever the intent, the effect is the same: a narrow, heavily qualified finding becomes a story of grievance and resentment. It's wrong, divisive, misleading and pathetic.
NEW: 4 in 5 new jobs created in Britain since 2014 were taken by migrants. Reform will make it cheaper to hire Brits, paid for by a levy on migrant workers. It should not be controversial to put the British people first.
8
110
6
243
10,367
Replying to @DanNeidle
People break the law because they don’t fear consequences. I’ve no doubt this story about Deloitte will reinforce the belief that some people/companies can operate with impunity. Even if sanctioned, the punishment is so weak as not to bother the offender.
1
64
The new White House press secretary, Katie Zacharia, claims the abortion pill contains the same chemicals used in Nazi extermination camps. Fact: Mifepristone was developed in 1980 in France. It doesn’t share a single chemical component with any of the Nazis’ chemicals or gases.
213
2,138
74
8,609
102,931
When the Guardian went on strike to protest the Observer sale, I became a de facto spokesperson. Later a Tortoise employee I’d never met wrote to me to cancel my 20-year contract. No goodbye & no pay-off. This is how they now take credit for my work..but write me out of the story
95
1,677
40
5,804
294,177
There is something deeply troubling about a society that not only executes a human being, but invites the world to watch. Even when justice must confront terrible evil, it should never lose sight of our common humanity. To livestream death risks turning punishment into entertainment. Surely civilisation is measured not by our capacity to kill, but by our willingness to defend the dignity of every human life, even at its end.
🚨 Pope Leo XIV has released an X post on the DEATH PENALTY ahead of the upcoming livestream execution of Nidal Hasan 'The death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person. The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment: effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption'
187
35
9
235
11,428