bugsinside retweeted
yann lecun, french-american researcher born in paris in 1960, has been chief AI scientist at Meta since 2013. Meta's market cap grew from $60B to $1.5T on the back of transformers and LLMs. he spent those same years publicly telling anyone who would listen that the entire architecture was fundamentally broken.
nobody listened. the transformer became a $4.6T industry.
this october 2026 paper - independent research, not affiliated with any institution - is the mathematical proof that he was right.
standard transformers compute in a single pass. H^(l) = Attention(H^(l-1)). one shot. no persistent state. no memory between tokens. no ability to revise reasoning mid-computation.
at 1K context: transformer accuracy 40%, NCM 60%. at 8K: transformer 42%, NCM 70%. at 32K: transformer 38%, NCM 75%. at 128K tokens - the scale every enterprise deployment now requires - transformer collapses to 35%. NCM holds at 80%.
the architecture replacing it: h_{t+1} = f(h_t, x_t, θ). a continuous internal state. information doesn't pass through once and disappear. it persists. it evolves. it gets refined across multiple computation steps.
state update: h_{t+1} = h_t + Δt · F(h_t, x_t, θ). a gated continuous function. the model doesn't process the next token and move on. it updates its entire internal representation based on everything it already computed.
transformer: quadratic complexity. static weights. implicit memory. reasoning: emergent, unreliable.
NCM: linear complexity. dynamic state. explicit memory h_t. reasoning: built-in. architectural.
lecun said in 2023: "LLMs cannot reason. they cannot plan. they are not going to get us to AGI."
the research community responded by raising another $500B in LLM funding.
Meta paid him $50M+ over a decade to be the loudest critic of the technology that made them $1.4T in market cap.
in 2026, anonymous independent research notes are publishing the architecture he predicted four years ago.
the paper ends with one sentence: "NCM may not simply improve LLMs - it could mark the next generation of language models."
lecun has been writing that sentence since 2022.
save this.
bugsinside retweeted
"WaveSpace is a modular Python toolbox for the
simulation and analysis of traveling wave dynamics in multichannel recording arrays."
joss.theoj.org/papers/10.211…
#neuroscience
bugsinside retweeted
this aligns with my thoughts on getting a PhD and intellectual jobs in the anthropocene. The trajectory you thought you could have is likely going to be obsolete. Collaboration will matter more than individual “genius” contributions
An Anthropic researcher just told a room full of PhD students that their career plan no longer exists
His 3 pieces of advice for students:
1. Use AI every day. If you're on the exponential, you'll never fall behind it.
2. Choose projects that get better when compute scales. The rest will be solved before you finish them.
3. Stop planning your career as if it were stable. The safe option no longer buys safety; it no longer exists.
And a phrase that sums it all up:
"Writing is thinking. If you outsource your writing, you outsource your thinking."
The talk is titled "The End of the Anthropocene"
bugsinside retweeted
📚 Open Access (free)
Kockelman, P. (2025). Mathematical Models of Meaning: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Possible World Semiotics. MIT Press. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/156…
bugsinside retweeted
Spectacular Nature piece on why AI is not conscious and probably will never be.
Three arguments:
1) Intelligence is not consciousness.
Intelligence is about solving problems. Consciousness is about having subjective experiences.
AlphaFold can solve super difficult problems. By contrast, our brains performs complex operations entirely outside awareness.
Problem-solving and consciousness are two separate things.
2. Biology is essential.
Our brains are alive, down to every cell. Their activity is inseparable from the living tissue that produces it.
The idea that consciousness can be reproduced simply by running the right computations on silicon components who do not fight for their life is a very far fetching and, I would add, almost religious, assumption.
3) The physical organization may matter more than the computation.
According to integrated information theory, consciousness requires specific causal relationships between a system’s physical components.
The computer architectures running today’s AI lack this organization.
The comparison with AlphaFold is particularly revealing:
Almost nobody things AlphaFold is conscious, despite its inner working is very similar to an LLM
Why?
Because it does not speak.
LLMs do speak like us and therefore we fall into an illusion:
Since they speak like us, they must be like us.
But this inference is wrong.
LLMs are just a series of matrix multiplications.
They are not conscious, and they will never be.
*
Paper in the first reply
bugsinside retweeted
CUDA kernels, distributed training, torch.compile internals, and disaggregated inference, without digging through hundreds of resources. Chris Fregly brings it together in one 20-chapter book. Free to download, plus a $150 Lambda cloud credit.
bugsinside retweeted
According to the laws of thermodynamics, information can be converted into energy. An information engine that harnesses environmental memory and exhibits non-Markovian dynamics has now been realized in experiments.
nature.com/articles/s41567-0…
bugsinside retweeted
Pilot study shows that a portable brain/neural exoskeleton powered by EEG + eye signals allowed #stroke survivors to complete bimanual daily tasks with high accuracy & fast control (<2s). ahajrnls.org/3JVptuH
@ssoekadar @WFNRehab @ChariteBerlin @SeoulNatlUni @snuh_official
bugsinside retweeted
Our latest “Reduction of sleep-like perilesional slow waves and clinical evolution after stroke: A TMS-EEG study” is now out on @ClinicalNeuroph
doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.202…
bugsinside retweeted
🧠 Microstate changes in stroke: more than meets the eye?
In a recent Letter to the Editor published in Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, Josef Finsterer and João Gama Marques highlight key confounding factors often overlooked when interpreting EEG microstate changes in stroke patients. Stroke type, location, latency, comorbidities, and medication use may all influence EEG patterns.
✒ Author:Josef Finsterer, João Gama Marques
🏪 Affiliation: Unidade Local de Saúde São José; @ULisboa_ Universidade De Lisboa
📌 Read the article: imrpress.com/journal/JIN/24/…
#EEG #Stroke #Neurophysiology #MicrostateAnalysis #BrainHealth #JournalofIntegrativeNeuroscience #NeuroResearch #IMRPress
bugsinside retweeted
Continuous EEG within 7 days after stoke identifies additional epileptiform abnormalities with prognostic value for post-stroke epilepsy beyond routine (short-duration) EEG.
doi.org/10.1002/ana.78251
#EEG #epilepsy
bugsinside retweeted
Zich et al. report that in acute stroke, initial severity relates to structural brain damage, whereas 6-months outcome is linked to neural activity, with combined measures providing the most accurate model of outcomes.
Read it at 👉buff.ly/vnMnc8v
#neuroscience #stroke
bugsinside retweeted
Comprehensive profiling of brain dynamics during anesthesia across phylogeny
nature.com/articles/s41593-0…
#neuroscience
bugsinside retweeted
Read more.
Read more.
Read more.
Read more.
Because reading is not passive.
A 2025 meta-analysis of brain-imaging studies found that reading activates a coordinated brain network in adults.
bugsinside retweeted
[1/n] Introducing Diffusion Reward Models (DRM)
Reward Models are at the core of LLM post-training. But almost all of them make the same simplification:
they collapse human preference into a single score.
The problem is that human feedback is often not a point — different people can hold distinct, even conflicting, judgments about the same response.
So we asked: Can a Reward Model learn the distribution of human preference?
Here’s what we found 👇
📄 Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.33803
💻 Code: github.com/thunlp/DRM
🤗 Models: huggingface.co/Teburile/DRM
bugsinside retweeted
"Foundation Models for Time Series Analysis: A Tutorial and Survey": "Foundation Models (FMs) have fundamentally reshaped the paradigm of model design for time series analysis, boosting various downstream tasks in practice." arxiv.org/html/2403.14735v3
N.B. A time-series foundation model is a machine-learning model pre-trained on a large and diverse collection of time-series data to learn patterns that can be reused across datasets and applications.
bugsinside retweeted
Deep kernel hedging arxiv.org/abs/2609.34474





































