“세상은, 자연은, 우리는 연결되어 있다” 📚건전한 담론을 위한 지식교양서
Joined January 2021
- Tweets930
- Following344
- Followers577
- Likes963
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
괴츠 알리의
[히틀러의 복지국가 : 약탈, 인종 학살, 공범들] 완독 후기
*한 줄 평 : 번영의 환상 뒤에 감쳐진, 착취와 학살의 그림자
독일 국민들이 히틀러와 나치에 순응할 수 있었던 요인들을, '사회경제적'인 시선에서 해석한 걸작이라고 생각합니다.
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
China is moving ahead on the Arctic trade route. Talking Trump and chokepoints on @CNN with my longtime colleague @FareedZakaria for Sea Change: America's new Great Game in the Arctic Circle prh.com/seachange:
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
So happy to have the opportunity to talk about why ships are the new chips, and maritime capacity matters in this @nytopinion essay adapted from my new book Sea Change nytimes.com/2026/10/07/opini…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
It's here! My new book, Sea Change, it's out today penguinrandomhouse.com/books… please give it a read and if you want to see pictures from my trip to the Arctic and videos too go to ranaforoohar.com
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Very pleased to have done Hidden Forces, one of my favorite podcasts, on my new book Sea Change: hiddenforces.io/podcasts/how…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
인공 지능과 인간 지성은 어떻게 다르며, 그 차이를 아는 것이 왜 중요한가
bookcluborigin.com/daily_not…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
I am very much looking forward to discussing What Happened to Liberal Democracy? with Michael Sandel on September 24 at MIT
On September 24 from 12-1 PM ET, join us for a fireside chat with @DAcemogluMIT and Michael Sandel on the themes of "What Happened to Liberal Democracy?"
This event is co-hosted by the Stone Center and the Leadership Now Project at @MITSloan.
Link to register below 👇
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Dear followers,
I’m delighted to share this BBC interview BBC World Service - The Interview, Daron Acemoglu, Economist: Liberal democracy is in crisis bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3ct98h…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Destruction of East India Company Gives US Lawmakers a Blueprint for Confronting Big Tech. The instruments to take apart entrenched corporate power “still exist,” but current governments are “lacking... the political nerve to use them,” said historian William Dalrymple
commondreams.org/news/break-…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
An essay I've just written for @nytimes on why Big Tech is the 21st Century’s equivalent of the East India Company:
"What It Would Take to Dismantle the Most Powerful Companies in the World" nytimes.com/2026/08/28/opini…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
In fact, in many areas where technooptimists argue that AI is going to revolutionize everything, the impact may be much less positive because current approaches are not helping us get to the bottom of mechanisms of human cognition, discovery, and innovation. In many of them, we need more and higher quality data to make further advance, and what makes AI very competent in coding and writing doesn’t generalize. Worse, in a few of them, AI enthusiasm may push research and investment in the wrong direction.
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Dear followers
This is a truly brilliant article by Henry Farrell. Not because it defends me against the Economist (I have moved on). It’s the way Farrell frames and analyzes the issues surrounding technooptimism and AI. The Acemoglu Wars Are All About AI. programmablemutter.com/p/the…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
One of the upshots of the Economist’s attack on Daron Acemoglu is that the key dividing line is not about methodology. You can literally be the most decorated mainstream economist but if you land on the “wrong” side, you are ousted.
The key dividing line is whose side you are on: workers or big business.
아세모글루는 포스트 케인스주의, 심지어 마르크스주의 경제학과 매우 유사한 결론에 도달했지만, 그 결론에 이르는 과정에서는 전혀 다른 개념과 방법론을 사용했다. 주류 경제학자들은 그의 기술적 능력이나 학문적 엄밀성을 문제 삼을 수 없다. 그것은 이미 충분히 입증되어 있기 때문이다.
Daron Acemoglu, who won the Nobel Prize in 2024, is no heterodox economist.
But now The Economist magazine has damned his work, because it challenges the untrammeled power of Big Tech elites. jacobin.com/2026/08/acemoglu…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
No economist accuses him of truly poor research, let alone academic malpractice. But is Daron Acemoglu’s reputation justified by his scholarship? economist.com/finance-and-ec…
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
I am not happy about the Economist’s article, which feels like a hit piece. There is also a background to it, which is more troubling (as I will share at some point). I asked them to allow me to respond. I am waiting for their answer. If not in the magazine, I will share my response here.