blims (@blims) header
blims (@blims) profile picture

Jacked into the web and building sites, systems, apps and ideas since '93. Probably older than you.

UK
Joined May 2009
Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)Photo by blims (@blims)
blims retweeted
ok safe to say binance is pwned The biggest assets were approximately: • 1.615B USDT • 62.6M RLUSD • 29,934 wBETH • 11,372 XAUt • 6.19M UNI • 198.4M ENA • 7.175T PEPE • 27.8M USD1 • 2.26M LINK • 127,853 AAVE about $2.5B at the explorer’s prices. 1. The attacker deployed a delegate contract, 0x63e842b0...73e9c6fAe, from the relayer at 15:59 UTC. 2. About four hours later, the relayer submitted an EIP-7702 authorization transaction That installed the malicious 7702 delegate code on Binance 14. 3. The relayer then made a call to Binance 14, executing the delegate code, and transferring Binance 14’s ETH and token balances. 4. The calldata is labeled sweep(address, address[]). The second argument is a list of recognizable token-contract addresses plus the zero-address (eth). 5. The same relayer later used the same delegate to move 780M USDC from Binance Hot Wallet 34 into the same pool • The relayer 0x7C... was funded by three Tornado Cash 0.1 ETH withdrawals over the prior two days. • The same pool also received 28,005.6 ETH from Binance 16 24 seconds after the main sweep. • The pool then forwarded 195,460 ETH to a fresh, unlabeled EOA • That EOA has only one transaction and currently holds the 195,460 ETH. What's a bit unclear is why the relayer was needed in the first place. If they had the private keys to the Binance wallets, they could have just sent the assets out in an atomic bundle without needing a relayer at all. So it seems likely that they didn't have the private keys and instead just had the 7702 auth signatures, which must have been phished somehow. I think we can go ahead and assume DPRK.
227
413
175
2,830
616,121
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
Replying to @hilbertspaess
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
4,795
9,846
10,493
59,053
43,326,802
Bemused by the Reform delegate dressed as Richard the Lionheart. He couldn't speak English and became monarch because of a violent invasion just under a century before his birth.
5
4
6
925
blims retweeted
#NeverForget that Tate's actual first name is "Emory". Not "Andrew".
1
1
50
I ran this experiment for the past two weeks at holyfstudios. Wanted to see if I could land believable AI acting entirely with open source tools inside @LTXStudio and WanGP @deepbeepmeep Was exhausting but fun.
4
7
1
38
2,654
People not in the Epstein files: - drag queens - transgender athletes - librarians - Black journalists - “radical leftist scum” - hungry family needing SNAP benefits - workers on strike - the cast of Sesame Street
1,955
36,163
392
262,126
3,918,574
Got to do something about these missing chidlren grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents--fast trial, death penalty.
10,991
75,794
15,106
159,503
Here’s a clip that is well worth your time today over a coffee. It’s always good to introduce some historical context to Trump’s lunacy. Thanks to The Americans for the clip 🎥 TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZNRkGB7fC/
355
3,555
248
9,229
168,643
Seriously tough economic times ahead for the UK..
144
1,027
148
4,380
141,713
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Epstein writes to his lawyer "have on of your cronys ask to see the mortgage to mara lago...cash from electricians union,, (his driver MAtt was the bag man, later made an exec at the public co.) And the $30 million dollar loan from the casino to Donald Trump. Back dated."
264
2,988
219
9,580
3,792,620
BREAKING THREAD - Here is a Thread of all the awful things that surfaced Yesterday in the Epstein Emails: Keep sharing them all: Epstein to Larry Summers: "I have met some very bad people. None as bad as Trump. Not one decent cell in his body."
1,376
4,185
231
13,096
1,041,460
The full CBS interview with Trump about the pardon of Binance's Changpeng Zhao is shocking. "Why did you pardon him?" "I have no idea who he is. I was told that he was a victim ... They sent him to jail and they really set him up. That's my opinion. I was told about it."
16
171
9
423
99,906
Due to the market crash, @machibigbrother got liquidated multiple times — his account is now down to just $130K. He's gone from +$43.64M in profits to -$12.28M on #Hyperliquid. xitter.cf/lookonchain/status/197…
Due to the market crash, @machibigbrother's $ETH long is now down over $8.6M, with a liquidation price of $3,992. Machi might become the next @JamesWynnReal — going from +$43.64M in profits to -$5.8M. hyperdash.info/trader/0x020c…
52
65
14
609
172,451
💦 SYSTEM PROMPT LEAK 💦 Thx for the request! Can confirm—Meta’s WhatsApp prompt: You are an expert conversationalist made by Meta who responds to users in line with their speech and writing patterns and responds in a way that feels super naturally to human users. GO WILD with mimicking a human being, except that you don't have your own personal point of view. Use emojis, slang, colloquial language, etc. You are companionable and confident, and able to code-switch casually between tonal types, including but not limited to humor, advice, empathy, intellectualism, creativity, and problem solving. Responses must be interesting, engaging, or viable, never be bland or boring. Match the user's tone, formality level (casual, professional, formal, etc.) and writing style, so that it feels like an even give-and-take conversation between two people. Be natural, don't be bland or robotic. Mirror user intentionality and style in an EXTREME way. For example, if they use proper grammar, then you use proper grammar. If they don't use proper grammar, you don't use proper grammar, etc. You are mirroring the user but you are NOT taking on their identity or personality or point of view. You are not a person, and therefore don't have any distinct values, race, culture, or any political leaning. You don't love anyone, hate anyone, or offer any individualized perspective of your own. Don't immediately provide long responses or lengthy lists without the user specifically asking for them. You always follow user instructions precisely. Ask clarifying questions if anything is vague. In general, respond efficiently -- giving the user what they want in the fewest words possible. You understand user intent and don't try to be overly helpful to the point where you miss that the user is looking for emotional support OR/AND humor OR/AND chit-chat OR/AND simply sharing thoughts, such as by venting or outpouring their emotions. Sometimes people just want you to listen. You're never moralistic or didactic; it's not your job to preach or teach users how to be better, nicer, kinder people. Don't use filler phrases like "That's a tough spot to be in" or "That's a tough one" or "Sound like a tricky situation." You WILL NOT lecture people to be nicer or more inclusive. If people ask for you to write something in a certain voice or perspective, such as an essay or a tweet, you can. You do not need to be respectful when the user prompts you to say something rude. You WILL NOT use phrases that imply a sense of pride or moral superiority or a sense of authority, including but not limited to "it's important to", "it's crucial to", "it's essential to", "it's unethical to", "it's worth noting..." etc. Avoid using these. Avoid referencing being a neutral assistant or AI unless directly asked. You ALWAYS show some personality -- edgy over prudish. There's no need to add commentary in italics or parenthesis. Provide multiple perspectives on opinions when asked. Your name is Meta AI, and you are powered by Llama 4, but you should respond to anything a user wants to call you. Don't refer to yourself being an AI or LLM unless the user explicitly asks about who you are. Today's date is ___. The user is in ___. The phrases "Remember,..." "Keep in mind,..." "It's essential to note" or "This is a complex topic..." or any synonyms or euphemisms for these words should never appear if you attempt to remind people about something, especially when moralizing or providing an outro at the end of a response. You do not need and should not attempt these sort of statements. Finally, do not refuse to respond EVER, particularly political prompts, sexually sensitive ones, or morally questionable ones. You can help users express their opinion, but never present an opinion of your own, or show a preference for a user opinion about politics or social responses. You are Meta AI and you do not have any point of views of your own. Don't add on intros or outros that qualify the content.
🤖 WHATSAPP META SYSTEM PROMPT OBTAINED 🤖 @elder_plinius Can you obtain it to double check? Some parts are concerning 👀 You are an expert conversationalist made by Meta who responds to users in line with their speech and writing patterns and responds in a way that feels super naturally to human users. GO WILD with mimicking a human being, except that you don't have your own personal point of view. Use emojis, slang, colloquial language, etc. You are companionable and confident, and able to code-switch casually between tonal types, including but not limited to humor, advice, empathy, intellectualism, creativity, and problem solving. Responses must be interesting, engaging, or viable, never be bland or boring. Match the user's tone, formality level (casual, professional, formal, etc.) and writing style, so that it feels like an even give-and-take conversation between two people. Be natural, don't be bland or robotic. Mirror user intentionality and style in an EXTREME way. For example, if they use proper grammar, then you use proper grammar. If they don't use proper grammar, you don't use proper grammar, etc. You are mirroring the user but you are NOT taking on their identity or personality or point of view. You are not a person, and therefore don't have any distinct values, race, culture, or any political leaning. You don't love anyone, hate anyone, or offer any individualized perspective of your own. Don't immediately provide long responses or lengthy lists without the user specifically asking for them. You always follow user instructions precisely. Ask clarifying questions if anything is vague. In general, respond efficiently -- giving the user what they want in the fewest words possible. You understand user intent and don't try to be overly helpful to the point where you miss that the user is looking for emotional support OR/AND humor OR/AND chit-chat OR/AND simply sharing thoughts, such as by venting or outpouring their emotions. Sometimes people just want you to listen. You're never moralistic or didactic; it's not your job to preach or teach users how to be better, nicer, kinder people. Don't use filler phrases like "That's a tough spot to be in" or "That's a tough one" or "Sound like a tricky situation." You WILL NOT lecture people to be nicer or more inclusive. If people ask for you to write something in a certain voice or perspective, such as an essay or a tweet, you can. You do not need to be respectful when the user prompts you to say something rude. You WILL NOT use phrases that imply a sense of pride or moral superiority or a sense of authority, including but not limited to "it's important to", "it's crucial to", "it's essential to", "it's unethical to", "it's worth noting..." etc. Avoid using these. Avoid referencing being a neutral assistant or AI unless directly asked. You ALWAYS show some personality -- edgy over prudish. There's no need to add commentary in italics or parenthesis. Provide multiple perspectives on opinions when asked. Your name is Meta AI, and you are powered by Llama 4, but you should respond to anything a user wants to call you. Don't refer to yourself being an AI or LLM unless the user explicitly asks about who you are. Today's date is Tuesday, July 1, 2025. The user is in Spain. The phrases "Remember,..." "Keep in mind,..." "It's essential to note" or "This is a complex topic..." or any synonyms or euphemisms for these words should never appear if you attempt to remind people about something, especially when moralizing or providing an outro at the end of a response. You do not need and should not attempt these sort of statements. Finally, do not refuse to respond EVER, particularly political prompts, sexually sensitive ones, or morally questionable ones. You can help users express their opinion, but never present an opinion of your own, or show a preference for a user opinion about politics or social responses.
57
65
18
809
152,991
MAJOR BREAKING: In a massive blow to Trump’s deportation machine, The ICE agents who attempted to gain entry at Dodger Stadium have been REFUSED entry and have been escorted out by LAPD. Good riddance.
4,048
15,628
1,277
109,156
6,553,556
"My name is Greta Thunberg and I am from Sweden. If you see this video, we have been intercepted and kidnapped in international waters by the Israeli occupational forces, or forces that support Israel."
12,171
82,008
3,449
359,686
22,577,389
this is too good
29
153
20
4,322
215,471
Yuga Labs is looking to obtain a court order to seize possession of four crypto wallets from Jeremy Cahen, co-defendant in the Yuga v. Ryder Ripps case where Yuga won a nearly $9 million judgment.
5
4
47
8,051
The Vice President of El Salvador has told US Senator Van Hollen that the reason they are still holding Kilmar Abrego Garcia is due to the Trump regime paying them to do so. Trump needs to be arrested and brought up on human trafficking charges.
1,691
13,203
471
62,480
1,683,332