@backhausgf

Critical (hole) Theorist | Research on Classical German Philosophy and its reception | PhDing @UNSW on Hegel‘s reception in France via Hyppolite

Joined March 2016
  • Tweets11.2K
  • Following1.3K
  • Followers1.6K
1.1KMedia
A Thread of Books read in 2024: 1. Love Me Tender — Constance Debré
1
1
8
8,738
Any1 know of good stuff which links temporality to logical sequence in philosophical writing (I’m not talking about temporal anchors, but more generally how any unfolding of an arg/logical sequence is necessarily temporal)? It’s quite obv but they’ll make me elaborate in diss
3
380
derrida officially confirmed analytic philosopher ✅
8
20
5
320
16,123
I’m just smarter than you
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
8
586
If you wanna know how my life is going, I woke up in the middle of the night with a book on Jacobi next to me and the a podcast on Sohn-Rethel playing
11
372
Alexander Tolano
@alexandertolano13 Oct 2025
Replying to @jonathanbfine
Define "wrong".
9
1
99
7,102
CALL FOR PAPERS The twenty-fourth annual meeting of the Foucault Circle University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana April 3-5, 2026 – at Pavia, Lombardy
4
4
809
…the “moral” charge of this phrase, but I think there’s good reason to think that the sexualization of the concept by its name is inessential/coming from the biased position of sexual society. it’s better thought of as like…sensation seeking?
3
1
30
1,019
9
133
40
1,439
74,182
Just turned in my final round of proofs. I guess this is happening for real now. Out November 4th:
Solidarity with Children front and back cover

ALT Solidarity with Children front and back cover

55
509
75
5,638
173,768
Because the humanities have a literary quality. Every sentence has been carefully crafted and ad-libbing just won't do. The precise wording is as much a fundamental part of the paper as the findings. It's not the same in the sciences and social sciences.
Jerry Coyne
@Evolutionistrue11 Aug 2025
Why do academics in the humanities read their papers aloud, word for word, when they give talks at universities or at meetings, while scientists generally speak extemporaneously? If you read, you might as well just hand out the paper. It's a mystery. whyevolutionistrue.com/2025/…

Why do academics in the humanities read their papers aloud?

One of the big differences between academics in the humanities and in the sciences is that, at professional meetings or during lectures, humanities scholars read aloud from a paper they are holding…

whyevolutionistrue.com
71
262
72
3,376
256,569
fuuuuuck my shitty snail life
21
402
15
3,580
87,342
Karen Ng on species being in Hegel and Marx. academia.edu/130298337/Speci…
2
52
10
307
26,853
the one and only twenty four karat gold labubu
3
2
28
1,447
Replying to @B0Y_TR0Y
i couldn’t help but wonder, is my leftist joe rogan still out there, and is his name Big?
1
3
176
8,375
If anyone is looking to hire a flâneur, please let me know. I think you’ll find my application appropriately underwhelming.
13
20
5
207
8,611
I’m just saying you could do better
1
13
792
Letting u guys know after some work I’ve developed the Ikea asylum and Body matcha youre welcome
1
298
"Gimme a break" naturalizes the bourgeois distinction of being on and off the clock. I want a 30 page self-criticism essay on my desk by next Tuesday.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
2
86
1
1,585
26,668
When the speaker mentions something I already know about
1
17
304
8,929
Should I mention Heidegger in my cover letter?
17
15
3
387
18,065
Load more