Harry retweeted
You have some ability to simulate seeing your bottlenecks by holding two different perspectives, but this gets greatly magnifed in closer relationships because you can hit your integration limit more.
This extra sight and motivation to expand it makes good relationships.
Harry retweeted
Replying to @romyrennnn
You’re not supposed to love anyone more than yourself, I think. You’re just supposed to find someone you can categorize as “yourself” for the purpose of love (Do Not Do This if you hate yourself though)
Harry retweeted
Replying to @TomWright165389
Almost every action can be a good opener if you pay attention to the feedback loops they make/change.
Harry retweeted
There's something common to enjoyable musical improv, enjoyable sex, and good convos which is like: being present and immersed, noticing and following what feels good and curious, noticing when you're forcing/clenching and stopping doing that. Part of this is just "flow," but it feels like the relational component is important too -- having something outside yourself to attune to and play off of
Harry retweeted
never forget that the purpose of this app is noticing other people are really interesting and wanting to get to know them
how to think good:
1. start with vibes (as if you have a choice)
2. where vibes feel off, decouple and apply reason
3. reason about where you can trust your vibes vs trusting reason
4. see if you vibe with the reasoned system you created
5. repeat until the steps blend together
The more room you give to things outside your control (God, fate, spirits, the universe), the more there is to respond to. Spiritual people are always being tested because “surrender” increases the surface area through which reality can reach you. Coincidence becomes difficult to isolate, and what happens today changes the meaning of what happened six months ago, which changes a decision made tomorrow. You’re now in a feedback loop with the unseen. The control freak ends up there too, monitoring every variable, adjusting, correcting. They look like opposites but they’re running the same process in reverse. One is constantly trying to anticipate life, while the other is constantly interpreting it.
I think being hard to offend online has a lot to do with having a strong sense of what you meant in the first place, even when you’re being deeply unserious or know it could be interpreted in different ways. When someone responds to a version of your argument that exists entirely in their own head, even if what they say is awful, it doesn’t really feel directed at you. They’re reacting to something you didn’t say and don’t believe, so there’s not much to take personally. Being easily offended requires, at least a little, being willing to let someone else tell you what you meant.
Harry retweeted
Replying to @harry_taussig @itsannpierce
Personally, I've found Kegan stages to be helpful to understand the situation and mindset that someone is in - whether that's someone else, myself in the past, or myself in the present. It helps me have empathy and acceptance






















