Ahaan Verma retweeted
When AI starts hallucinating in Sanskrit:
“NASA hi Nasha hai”
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Issue raised at 7:48 AM
Response by UP CEO at 7:16 PM
Call by 8:51 PM
Issue resolved by 9:32 PM.
Does this happen to every voter. Or for the privileged few?
Ahaan Verma retweeted
The right is always bereft of intellectuals but even here the Hindu Right is unique. So painfully mediocre & insecure that the IT cell of the largest political party in the world has to pour all its resources in defending a joker in Sanjeev Sanyal.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
कोल्हापुरातील गोकुळ दूध संघाच्या निवडणुकीचा जनादेश देवेंद्र फडणवीस आणि महायुतीच्या नेत्यांच्या पचनी पडत नसल्याचं आता स्पष्ट दिसत आहे!
विजयी उमेदवारांना प्रमाणपत्र देण्यात अडथळे निर्माण केल्यानंतर, मतमोजणी पूर्ण होऊन निकाल स्पष्ट झालेला असतानाही फेरमतमोजणीच्या नावाखाली पुन्हा मतमोजणी सुरू करण्यात आली आहे.
या संपूर्ण प्रक्रियेदरम्यान निवडणूक अधिकारी (ERO) मौसमी चौगुले या मतमोजणी केंद्रावर फोनवर बोलताना दिसत आहेत. हे फोन नेमके कोण करतंय? त्यांना फोनवरून कोणते आदेश दिले जात आहेत? या सगळ्याचा खुलासा होणं गरजेचं आहे.
जनतेचा कौल स्पष्ट असताना निकाल लांबवण्याचा हा प्रकार नेमका कशासाठी? लोकशाहीत मतदारांचा जनादेश मान्य करण्याऐवजी तो रोखण्याचा किंवा त्याला विलंब लावण्याचा प्रयत्न होत असेल, तर त्याचा जाब विचारलाच पाहिजे.
मा. सतेज पाटील यांच्या नेतृत्वाखाली स्वाभिमानी ठरावधारकांचा आवाज बनलेल्या समविचारी आघाडीला मिळालेला हा स्पष्ट कौल महायुतीच्या इतका जिव्हारी लागलाय की, आता पराभव स्वीकारण्याऐवजी जनादेशालाच रोखण्याचे प्रयत्न सुरू झाले आहेत!
गोकुळचा निकाल जनतेने दिलाय;
तो सत्तेच्या दबावाने बदलता येणार नाही!
Ahaan Verma retweeted
When you have 100 murderers in your party but only 99 seats to offer them to contest elections.
Allahabad High Court suspends conviction of murder convict who wishes to contest election on BJP ticket
barandbench.com/news/allahab…
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Big blow to BJP & its alliance partners. In prestigious & high stake Gokul Cooperative Milk Federation election, Congress led panel headed by Congress leader Satej Patil won the majority of 14 seats while MahaYuti ruling party led panel won 11 seats in total 25 seats elections.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Can't help but admire Lawrence Bishnoi and how he has figured out law and order. He orders from a jail in Gujarat and the law looks on.
Why waste his talent in the private sector? Give him the home ministry.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
If you read history, you will understand that it is the fear of the people in the hearts of their govt is what makes Europe Europe. And that is why the kids of India'a rich, famous and powerful line up to settle there.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Um grande parabéns para o sorveteiro! Que ele tenha bastante sucesso e boas vendas
Ahaan Verma retweeted
ECI submitted to Supreme Court that the De Duplication software was no longer used.
👇👇
reporters-collective.in/trc/…
Do better in hiding your lies the next time.
Get trained from Gyanesh - expert in telling all kinds of lies & committing crimes against people in the name of #SIR
Mr Fact-checker please fact-check your own facts.
There is no such scheme as “Buy one Get one free” scheme by Election Commission.
As per your post, the voter had submitted only two applications and he got 4 EPIC cards.
This statement is false.
The voter had submitted 4 applications.
If you want to dispute our facts then you post the reference numbers of two applications that you claim he had submitted and we will post the reference number of the remaining two.
The problem of generation of multiple EPICs on submission of multiple forms of an individual is a long standing one. We do deduplication through ECINET periodically. We are on path to achieving the objective of catching multiple forms submitted by an individual at the submission stage only. We will achieve our objective very soon.
Please do not incite people by making patently false statements about ECI and thereby trying to create disaffection among the citizens towards a Constitutional Body.
You are advised to rectify your mistake by amending or deleting your post after completing your own due diligence now that you have been informed by us about your wrong information.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Gems of UP SIR :
17 people. 34 voter IDs. One booth in Bulandshahr.
15 filed just ONE Form 6 each as per available data available on UP CEO website, yet all 17 appear twice in the final roll with different voter IDs.
Hello Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup, We were told, SIR was supposed to remove duplicates. How did your process create them? Who is responsible?
Instead of trying to intimidate “Mr Fact-Checker,” do the job entrusted to you. Explain these discrepancies, fix the rolls and answer the public. Bullying those who expose failures is no substitute for accountability.
#UPSIRFiles
Hello, Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup. Stop acting like a troll by threatening citizens who point out flaws in SIR.
The SIR exercise in Uttar Pradesh was completed and the final electoral rolls were published in April 2026. Yet duplicate entries remain unresolved. Wasn’t eliminating duplicate entries one of the central objectives of this entire exercise?
Also, do you understand sarcasm? “Buy one, get one free” was precisely that.
In your own tweet, you acknowledge issuing four voter ID cards with different EPIC numbers to one person. How did four applications in the same person’s name pass scrutiny and result in four separate voter IDs?
Submitting four Form6 applications is wrong. Accepting and processing those duplicate requests exposes an even bigger failure in verification. What is the point of SIR if your system cannot detect repeated applications from the same person? If someone applies for fresh enrolment ten times, will @ECISVEEP issue ten different voter IDs?
Further, according to the Form 9 records uploaded on your own UP CEO website, Mr. Sundar submitted Form 6 on January 6 and again on January 14. We have the data for that booth. These are your own official records. This data was uploaded on your own UP CEO website. Also Please upload all Form9s on your website. Many are still missing. Instead of threatening us, Please put more efforts on fixing the failures instead of threatening citizens who expose them.
There are many such cases, Let me share a few more examples here.
Follow below thread. 🧵🔥
Ahaan Verma retweeted
This is Tommy. Tommy had a question about my allegiances. Listen to the end to hear about his.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Hello, Mr. Navdeep Rinwa @ceoup. Stop acting like a troll by threatening citizens who point out flaws in SIR.
The SIR exercise in Uttar Pradesh was completed and the final electoral rolls were published in April 2026. Yet duplicate entries remain unresolved. Wasn’t eliminating duplicate entries one of the central objectives of this entire exercise?
Also, do you understand sarcasm? “Buy one, get one free” was precisely that.
In your own tweet, you acknowledge issuing four voter ID cards with different EPIC numbers to one person. How did four applications in the same person’s name pass scrutiny and result in four separate voter IDs?
Submitting four Form6 applications is wrong. Accepting and processing those duplicate requests exposes an even bigger failure in verification. What is the point of SIR if your system cannot detect repeated applications from the same person? If someone applies for fresh enrolment ten times, will @ECISVEEP issue ten different voter IDs?
Further, according to the Form 9 records uploaded on your own UP CEO website, Mr. Sundar submitted Form 6 on January 6 and again on January 14. We have the data for that booth. These are your own official records. This data was uploaded on your own UP CEO website. Also Please upload all Form9s on your website. Many are still missing. Instead of threatening us, Please put more efforts on fixing the failures instead of threatening citizens who expose them.
There are many such cases, Let me share a few more examples here.
Follow below thread. 🧵🔥
Mr Fact-checker please fact-check your own facts.
There is no such scheme as “Buy one Get one free” scheme by Election Commission.
As per your post, the voter had submitted only two applications and he got 4 EPIC cards.
This statement is false.
The voter had submitted 4 applications.
If you want to dispute our facts then you post the reference numbers of two applications that you claim he had submitted and we will post the reference number of the remaining two.
The problem of generation of multiple EPICs on submission of multiple forms of an individual is a long standing one. We do deduplication through ECINET periodically. We are on path to achieving the objective of catching multiple forms submitted by an individual at the submission stage only. We will achieve our objective very soon.
Please do not incite people by making patently false statements about ECI and thereby trying to create disaffection among the citizens towards a Constitutional Body.
You are advised to rectify your mistake by amending or deleting your post after completing your own due diligence now that you have been informed by us about your wrong information.
Ahaan Verma retweeted
Mr. CEO, was vote chori not enough that you are now doing vote seena-zori also? Nihayti besharami, you are accepting what he said but asking him to correct his facts?
Aur hindustan ke naagrikon se thoda tameez se baat kariye, varna hindustan ka yuva aapko tasalli baksh tameez sikha dega.
Mr Fact-checker please fact-check your own facts.
There is no such scheme as “Buy one Get one free” scheme by Election Commission.
As per your post, the voter had submitted only two applications and he got 4 EPIC cards.
This statement is false.
The voter had submitted 4 applications.
If you want to dispute our facts then you post the reference numbers of two applications that you claim he had submitted and we will post the reference number of the remaining two.
The problem of generation of multiple EPICs on submission of multiple forms of an individual is a long standing one. We do deduplication through ECINET periodically. We are on path to achieving the objective of catching multiple forms submitted by an individual at the submission stage only. We will achieve our objective very soon.
Please do not incite people by making patently false statements about ECI and thereby trying to create disaffection among the citizens towards a Constitutional Body.
You are advised to rectify your mistake by amending or deleting your post after completing your own due diligence now that you have been informed by us about your wrong information.