Sedehi retweeted
What Ilham Aliyev will never publicly admit is that his family came to power through the will of Iossif Stalin.
Stalin, who was Georgian, was openly Iranophobic. Not only did he consider (before abandoning the idea) seizing southern Azerbaijan from Iran, but he also expelled the Persian-speaking Shiites from Dagestan (who had once been the majority) to replace them with Sunnis, and even created a new Sunni capital for Dagestan, Makhachkala, in place of Shiite Derbent.
Similarly, in Arran (northern Azerbaijan), where Persian-speaking Azerbaijanis remained numerous and held power, he expelled them to Iran (southern Azerbaijan) and installed more Turkic-speaking people there, including the Aliyev family. The Aliyevs became a dynasty of tyrants by Stalin's will and no other. Turkey played no role.
Sedehi retweeted
Apartments in Tehran, Iran, designed by architect Firouz Firouz
Clay bricks on the outside, set against glazed turquoise tiles to the balconies. Fantastic!
پول ایران رو به قطر دادند که به #ایران پس نده! بعد قطر میاد از منابع گاز ایران برداشت میکنه گاز از رو از آب ایران عبور میده و به همه جای دنیا میفروشه. پول ایران رو کره جنوبی پس نمیده اتحادیه اروپا پس نمیده به هواپیمای ایران حتی چند لیتر بنزین نمیدن که هواپیما از اون بالا نیافته. چرا قبلا #تنگه_هرمز رو بر روی کشتی های کره ای و قطری و … نبستند؟
Sedehi retweeted
بخاطر تمام فحش هایم به
قاسم سلیمانی
و خوشحالی از مرگش
عذرخواهی میکنم
من و دوستام فهمیدیم
اینا
نه دزد هستند
نه فرار میگنند
هیچی هم به جز ایران و تمامیت ارضیش براشون مهم نیست
ما زیر بمباران بودیم
اینا جانفدا ما بودند
در حالیکه پهلوی و طرفداراش رو زخمها ما جشن گرفته بودند
Am I the only one who thinks Bernard Jenkin looks dubious on #BBC #newsnight ? Why is he so negative?
Sedehi retweeted
I was thirty-something years old when Iranian students dragged me into a room and told me I wasn't going anywhere. Four hundred and forty-four days later, I walked out. I've spent the decades since trying to make sense of what happened — and what keeps happening — between our two countries.
So don't talk to me about Iran like it's an abstraction. I lived inside that confrontation. I felt it.
Which is why I'm not ready to write off this ceasefire, even though everything about it is maddening.
Negotiations in Pakistan may produce nothing. The talks could collapse before they get started. I've seen American diplomacy with Iran fail more times than I can count, and usually for the same reasons — too much pride, too little patience, and Israel holding a match in the corner of the room.
But here's what I know in my bones: another war won't break Iran. We just tried. It didn't work. Iran doesn't break — it absorbs, it adapts, and it waits. I watched that stubbornness up close for 444 days.
What bothers me most isn't that Iran is winning this moment — it's that we handed it to them. Tehran's framework is running these negotiations. Iran still controls the Strait of Hormuz. Still collecting tolls. Trump looked at their proposal and called it workable. I never thought I'd see the day, but here we are.
Iran wants everything on the table — sanctions, enrichment rights, American troops out, and a deal that covers what's happening in Lebanon and Gaza too. That's a lot to swallow. And Israel, which wasn't invited to this conversation, is already making clear it has no intention of being constrained by it.
That's the part that worries me the most. Because if Israel keeps bombing and Washington can't or won't stop it, none of this holds.
And yet — and I say this as someone who has every reason to distrust Tehran — I don't think we go back to all-out war. Not because anyone has suddenly gotten wise, but because the math doesn't work. A second round ends the same way. Iran still controls the Strait. The global economy still flinches when Tehran flexes.
What we're heading toward isn't peace. It's something smaller and more precarious — two countries silently agreeing not to destroy each other today, with no paperwork and no guarantees.
I know what it's like to survive on something that fragile. For 444 days, that's all I had.
Sedehi retweeted
Israel has more military in uniform, an Iron Dome protection, more than six times as many tanks and twice as many combat aircraft than the UK for a smaller budget. Why can’t the UK government get more for our defence money?
بنظرم این سرباز اسراییلی با اینکه در جبهه مخالف میجنگه ولی سوالی بسیار به جا و صادقانه بیان کرده و سطلی های تنبل دماغ حودشونروهمبه زوربالا میشکن
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Sedehi retweeted
دو روی یک سکه:
اسراییل اینترنشنال، ۲۰:۳۰
علی حسین قاضی زاده، محمدرضا شهبازی
سالومه سیدنیّا، امنه سادات ذبیحپور
سعید حدادیان، شاهین نجفی
سعید قاسمینژاد، سعید جلیلی
مراد ویسی، علی اکبر رائفیپور
سلطنت پهلوی، ولایت فقیه مجتبی خامنهای
مهدی نصیری، حمید رسایی
امیر اعتمادی، امیرحسین ثابتی
دوران طلایی امام، دوران طلایی شاهنشاه آریامهر
رهبر شیعیان جهان، خاندان ایرانساز پهلوی
…
گاهی فکر میکنم احمقانه نیست که یک هواپیما از سن دیه گو راه بیافته بیاد تهران که سگ دخترخاله منو بترسونه ؟!
Sedehi retweeted
I am told by White House sources that Trump is seriously considering taking Kharg Island.
Sedehi retweeted
"A state banquet? While he's bombing the hell out of Iran and people are dying all over the Middle East...?"
David Dimbleby, journalist and presenter, argues against King Charles' planned state visit to the US in April.
#Newsnight
BBC Newsnight
Follow BBC Newsnight on Twitter. Like us on Facebook. Catch up on iPlayer https://bbc.in/2Ps915G
Sedehi retweeted
I have received information from several credible sources indicating that Israel is prepared and indeed preparing to use nuclear weapons in its war with Iran.
If this is the case, Iran is not the only place that urgently needs regime change. What do you think ?
Sedehi retweeted
I don't think people understand the gravity of the situation as the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran.
This is a picture of Tehran. For you uneducated, untraveled, never-served, warhawks licking your chops at the thought of bombing it. It's not some low population desert. There are families, children, family pets. Regular working class people with dreams. You're sick to want war.
Tehran is a city of nearly 10,000,000 people. Imagine nuking Washington, Berlin, Paris, London, or beyond, bombed with nuclear weapons.
I gave up my diplomatic career to leak this information. I suspended my duties so as not to be part of or a witness to this crime against humanity, in an attempt to prevent a nuclear winter before it is too late.
Yesterday, nearly ten million people protested “No Kings” in the United States. The possibility of the use of nuclear weapons must be taken very seriously. It's dangerous. Act now. Spread this message worldwide. Take the streets. Protest for our humanity and future. Only the people can stop it. History will remember us.
Sedehi retweeted
I guess this is also part of the Iranian propaganda war that the @nytimes is so worried about.....
Sedehi retweeted
This is NOT an attack on the Mullahs or the Islamic Republic. Its an assault on Iran
Sedehi retweeted
NY Times has essentially confirmed that Israel played a role in stimulating the violent regime change riots that left around 3000 dead in Iran this January 8 and 9, but which were marketed in the West as pro-democracy protests.
It was well understood by the Mossad that those riots would help stimulate military action by Trump.
Israeli intel merely needed to convince the feeble-minded president that a wave of decapitation strikes would unleash a massive upheaval to immediately topple the Islamic Republic. The January riots were presented to Trump as a preview of what was to come.
Western media, including the NY Times and The Guardian, played a central role in legitimizing Israel's deception by falsely characterizing the violent regime change riots as mere protests, massively inflating the death toll and covering up the fact that many were murdered by the Israel-backed rioters themselves
The whole of Western media and the Western human rights industrial complex deliberately misrepresented the real character of those riots. But now that the war they helped to instigate is going badly for the US and Israel, that same media is now free to reveal a few kernels of truth.
Sedehi retweeted
.@johnhawkes2001. One supports the Iranian people by promoting peace between Iran and the west and by reviving Iran's middle class, the basis of civil society and the best hope for the eventual removal of the mullahs. The 2015 JCPOA did this. Trump tore it up in 2018, preferring the path to war. See: theamericanconservative.com/…
Replying to @ClarkeMicah
Peter, with respect, you cannot seriously equate “civilised rules of behaviour” with a regime like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. This is not a state that has shown any consistent regard for such rules, either domestically or internationally.
Your argument appears to rest on the assumption that restraint alone preserves order. History suggests otherwise. Since the Iranian Revolution, the regime has maintained power through repression at home and projection of force abroad. Its record includes the suppression of dissent, the imprisonment and execution of political opponents, and sustained support for proxy groups across the region.
So the question is not merely whether Donald Trump has acted wisely or unwisely in any given moment. The more pertinent point is that confrontation with Iran’s ruling system was, sooner or later, inevitable. Whether initiated by an American administration, regional actors, or by internal collapse, the trajectory has been visible for decades.
To frame this purely as a breach of etiquette in international conduct is to mistake the nature of the problem. We are not dealing with a misunderstanding among well-intentioned states, but with a regime whose ideological commitments have long placed it at odds with both its own people and wider stability.
The more serious discussion, therefore, is not about temporary outrage, but about outcomes.
What would a post-IRGC Iran look like? What replaces a system that has combined clerical absolutism with militarised enforcement?
And how does one support the Iranian people, who have repeatedly demonstrated, often at great personal cost, that they aspire to something better?

























