Has anyone ever heard of any Gas companies giving away gas for free to people affected by a natural disaster?
Tan is right- people who SELL as an overreaction are gamblers.
The full context was missing from the early articles that reported what he was saying.
Tan said the market misread OpenAI’s revenue figures because the underlying business is strong, and that investors who sell on a single short-term data point are “no different from gambling in a casino.” In this version, the remark targets panic or overreaction to short-term numbers more than broad AI investing itself.
This is another market selloff due to a misreading by reporters who stoke fear
It's probably a disqualifier if the CEO of an AI hardware company is bearish about AI.
Just saying, $AVGO.
RASP is the new Aerospace and defense trade
Rocket Lab $RKLB
Archer $ACHR
SpaceX $SPCX
Palantir $PLTR
Barclays launched aerospace and defense coverage with a bullish view, saying the U.S. is in the “early innings of a modern day industrial revolution.”
$SPCX – Overweight, $254 price target.
$RKLB – Overweight, $85 price target.
$PLTR – Overweight, $265 price target.
$ACHR – Upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight, with the price target raised to $8 from $4.50.
The firm prefers defense technology over large-cap primes and also sees opportunities in aerospace and aftermarket.
OpenAI doesn’t have enough compute to provide access. Without distribution, people will find alternatives to incorporate into their daily workflow.
AI agents will be a commodity for most people’s use cases. Highly technical users will funnel towards the best models for their specialties
Thank you Mr. Altman for making Dots available only on Pro while Muse stays free across $META massive consumer base.
That gives Meta a massive head start because agents get stickier as they learn more about you & every month Muse builds those habits makes it harder to replace.
Yeah, SpaceX becoming a whole AI chain vertical, from independent power generation, chip manufacturing, datacenter building, operations, neocloud, LLM and AI agent model, orbital data center, internet provider, and last would be physical AI provider
One is Iron Man with Jarvis and a rocket powered suit @elonmusk , the other is Batman with SONAR surveillance system and the multitude of Bat-Drone, Bat-computer, and Bat-sub @PalmerLuckey
Lots of fun to think about
If only they had an AI agent that could have anticipated the need for the website and executed on acquiring it before their announcement… @bot reigns supreme
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA NO WAY.
> OpenAI just announced Dots.
> SpaceXAI bought Dot.com
it redirects straight to the Grok Bot download page. based lmao.
Tell the world to buy @Tesla without telling them to buy a Tesla.
ICE Car makers: make things more difficult to service, maintain, or replace.
Tesla: Reduce or remove as much as possible that needs service, maintenance, or replacement
$ONDS that looks like an Ondas drone buster to me
🇺🇸🇲🇽 The laser burning cartel drones over Texas right now is the same weapon America is counting on against Iran's Shaheds
Joint Task Force Southern Border has taken down eleven cartel drones since late August with truck-mounted LOCUST systems from AeroVironment, and drone activity in those sectors has fallen about 75%.
The beam is invisible infrared, holding photons on one spot until the sensors melt or the drone comes apart, and crews can drive it wherever the next threat appears.
AeroVironment began building these in 2023 and the Army took its first prototypes in September 2025, so the program predates this war by months.
What the war did was prove the math everyone suspected, because Iran builds Shaheds for around $20,000 and Washington spent seven months swatting them with interceptors costing millions, burning half the national stockpile.
A laser shot runs three to five dollars off a generator.
Cartel scouting drones are small fry next to a Shahed, but the lesson holds either way, America FINALLY learned that the expensive answer is not always the better one.
Source: Wired, NewsNation / Writer: Daniel
Absolutely, if a mad scientist creates a monster they can’t control, the scientist is to blame for any destruction the monster causes.
If a creator with virtues imbues human values and harmony into technology, it is a piece art that is brought to life.
There is something to be said about founders who have children and can view the world through their eyes. Driven to build a better future for their children to live in
Mark Zuckerberg: “I don’t think that we need some kind of industry-wide coordination... I think that just each lab needs to take the time, and when it sees that there are issues, you just take the time that you need internally to make sure that you’re proceeding safely…
“we’re entering a phase where trust and alignment is actually going to be the most important next set of capabilities. I think we’re getting to a point where it may not matter that much how much better it gets at math.
“I happen to think that there’s plenty of commercial incentive to get this right.
We delayed the launch of Muse for a few months because we wanted it to be a better product for users. This was not a sacrifice on our part, but rather the right decision for the users and for Meta. I believe this approach would also be correct for other companies working on developing this technology.
“When you hear people in the industry talk about some trade-off between capabilities and getting it aligned, I just disagree with that. I believe that alignment is actually the next most important ability to master if we are going to make this system useful to many people.”
Consistency with success is elite performance. There's a clear difference between luck and skill.
Skill comes from work and sacrifice to develop technique and methodologies to ensure a greater probablility of an outcome.
$RKLB has the workplace culture and skill to create lasting success.
$RKLB
Only 3 companies in the world can manufacture leading-edge 2nm chips.
Only 2 private companies have built their own orbital rocket and scaled it to ~100 launches: SpaceX and Rocket Lab.
Think about that.
We understand how insanely hard what TSMC does is. I don’t think people fully appreciate that $RKLB is operating in a similarly rare engineering club.
Getting to orbit once is hard. Doing it ~100 times is an entirely different level of engineering, manufacturing, and execution.
People who dismiss Electron are like people dismissing TSMC because “they just make chips.”
The hard part isn’t doing it once. The hard part is doing the nearly impossible over and over again.
Knocking on wood before launch 100.
NFA
$RKLB Let's send the GHOST! (Global Hypersonic & Orbital Spaceport Technology) from Rocket Lab: a new globally-deployable containerized launch system to enable suborbital and orbital launches from anywhere in the world.
Launch costs are not getting cheaper. It is not an abundant commodity.
The orbital destinations, dates, and availability influence their value.
Replying to @SpaceInvestor_D
Price per kilo or pound is how we buy fruit at the grocery store. Launch is having seats on a plane to a specific destination. If there’s no commercial flight to where you want to go, you gotta fly private.
The cost of launch for rideshare will bake in the total cost of R&D to this point. Internal reduction in price/kilo does not mean launch costs are going down for all others in rideshare. Launch costs will be relative to the opportunity cost of not having satellites operational between the upcoming launch and the following launch.
How much revenue can the satellites on a fully loaded Starship generate between flights?
As the value of internal payload increases, so will the cost of launch for rideshare. AI compute in space will become a major priority.
SpaceX is ramping up their orbital data centers for Sun synchronous orbit and updating to Starlink V3 satellites. I’m not sure SpaceX wants to give up their capacity to others when their satellites generate recurring revenue. Delaying their satellites from powering on is an opportunity cost. The value of sun synchronous orbit is also something they aren’t going to want flooded with anything except their own satellites.
The capacity I see will come from insufficient internal satellite or other payload production (when they are just short of filling max capacity) or specific launch dates set for rideshare.
There's going to be much more traffic in space. Every satellite will need options for collision avoidance:
Chemical or Gas propellant thrusters and Electric propulsion thrusters.
Reaction wheels are also critical for maneuvering the entire satellite and positioning the thrusters where they need to go.
$RKLB is a key manufacturer and supplier of a whole range of reaction wheels and Gauss, their electric Hall thruster.
BREAKING: SpaceX’s Starlink satellites performed 207,152 proactive collision-avoidance maneuvers in just six months.
The advanced autonomous system:
• Detects potential close approaches
• Calculates the level of risk
• Adjusts orbital paths when needed
• Acts at a highly cautious threshold of just 3 in 10 million
SpaceX is managing the world’s largest satellite constellation with precision, automation and a safety-first approach.
Open source will allow worldwide peer review.
If Anthropic is afraid, they can stop, or work to solve it. If they can’t solve it, don’t release a dangerous or uncontrollable model. If they need help, partner with a competitor they’d trust the most.
Would the Internet have become what it is today if its core protocols were controlled by a single entity or a group (cartel) of entities?
The internet evolved from ARPANET, IBM, Xerox and countless closed independent networks when all were able to communicate with each other permissionless when they started building on the open protocol - TCP/IP.
The 'World Wide Web', as we call it today.
A highly closed, centrally controlled Internet would have created serious risks - particularly as to 'who' controlled how information moved.
The internet was the 'age of information'.
And now we've moved to the 'age of intelligence'.
And the consequences of centrally controlled intelligence if far far greater than centrally controlled information - internet.
Reminds me of the Victus Haze mission with $RKLB and True Anomaly. Puma and Jackal satellites playing cat and mouse.
Space based capabilities and services that will be essential for the future
🇺🇸🇮🇷🇨🇳 A Chinese satellite that may have helped Iran kill U.S. soldiers just mysteriously broke apart in orbit, and nobody is explaining why...
China supplied Iran with high-res satellite imagery of a U.S. military base in Jordan before an Iranian attack in July, according to the Wall Street Journal.
That attack killed 3 American service members...
They called it the clearest evidence yet that Chinese support for Iran had LETHAL consequences for U.S. forces.
6 weeks later, China's Yaogan-50 military reconnaissance satellite, the type used to gather imagery of military bases, ships, and troop movements, broke apart in orbit creating 43+ debris fragments.
Cause: officially unknown.
China's embassy DENIES the imagery claims. U.S. officials stopped short of alleging direct Chinese government involvement.
But the sequence is difficult to ignore:
Chinese satellite data helps kill American soldiers, and a Chinese military reconnaissance satellite silently disintegrates weeks later with no explanation...
Did the U.S. take it out?
Nobody is saying that.
Nobody is saying they didn't.
Source: WSJ, Space News / Writer: Michael
It’s Harry Potter warning us about Voldemort
Former OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon, who just quit Anthropic, is warning the public that AI is "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created."
I find this entire situation extremely odd for a few reasons:
1) Yesterday, Jacob made 7 posts in a thread at exactly 8:04pm.
You cannot schedule thread posts, you must write or copy paste each one. Assuming he started posting at exactly 8:04:01 and copy pasted them all, that's one post every 8 seconds.
2) Despite Jacob having no prior X posts, somehow his original post got 124 million views.
3) Less than 24 hours later, Jacob is scheduled on every major media station warning the public that AI is more dangerous than nuclear weapons.
If you're a 3 letter agency preparing the narrative for a potential cyber-attack, it would look very similar to this.
These psychological operations are called predictive programming; where you expose the public to plausible narratives, so when they happen the public accepts the new reality as fact, without question.
Very suspicious, no? 🤔
































