Joined June 2023
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @ellymelly
Sorry from New Zealand.
1
6
Replying to @secondzeit
The left gave the right an open goal with the gang issue. You can hardly blame the right for taking advantage of it.
1
14
Replying to @wekatweets
brashandmitchell.com/post/dr… "There were readings on Te Tiriti, colonisation and institutional racism, discussion of “the concept of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as a concept”, and strategies for managing my “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. If the supervisor reported badly on me, my case would go back to the Council." This is happening in New Zealand, not a Communist Chinese prison.
1
54
I can’t stop thinking about this. There’s an almost sadistic aspect to what the Medical Council has done here. It’s not just censure, but a kind of ritual humiliation — making the transgressor kiss the rod and beg for his career and write contrite essays like a little schoolboy.
In November 2022, Waikato GP Dr David Smylie received a dinner invitation from a sales rep that opened “Ate Marie Everyone”. Late that night, he fired back a four-sentence private reply, joking about the typo and grumbling about the amount of te reo in her email. You might not agree with what Dr Smylie said, but it wasn’t sent to a colleague or a patient. Her manager complained to the Medical Council. Within days, Dr Smylie had written an apology. The Council never passed it on, at one point claiming it would “interfere with an active investigation”. When the rep was later interviewed and the committee chair floated a meeting with him, another member warned her off: “it’s tough calling out racism.” The Professional Conduct Committee found his comments “objectively racist, offensive, and insensitive”. Whether he meant any harm was “of little consequence”. His four sentences had “the potential to contribute to current health inequities”. The penalty was a year of what the Council called an “Educational Programme”: monthly sessions with a supervisor who reported back on him, readings on colonisation and institutional racism, and strategies for managing his “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. He was expected to pay for it, at $125 an hour plus GST. To finish, he had to write two essays, including 1,000 words on structural racism in New Zealand health care. In almost 40 years of practice, nobody had complained about his care. The committee’s ruling noted he had “not yet” received a complaint. He sat through all twelve sessions and refused to write the essays, on a matter of principle. Dr Smylie now practises overseas. Health NZ is short of doctors and recruiting from abroad. The Medical Council has driven one out over a private email. Dr Smylie tells the full story on Free to Speak: In November 2022, Waikato GP Dr David Smylie received a dinner invitation from a sales rep that opened “Ate Marie Everyone”. Late that night, he fired back a four-sentence private reply, joking about the typo and grumbling about the amount of te reo in her email. You might not agree with what Dr Smylie said, but it wasn’t sent to a colleague or a patient, and was remarkably minor. Her manager complained to the Medical Council. Within days, Dr Smylie had written an apology. The Council never passed it on, at one point claiming it would “interfere with an active investigation”. When the rep was later interviewed and the committee chair floated a meeting with him, another member warned her off: “it’s tough calling out racism.” The Professional Conduct Committee found his comments “objectively racist, offensive, and insensitive”. Whether he meant any harm was “of little consequence”. His four sentences had “the potential to contribute to current health inequities”. The penalty was a year of what the Council called an “Educational Programme”: monthly sessions with a supervisor who reported back on him, readings on colonisation and institutional racism, and strategies for managing his “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. He was expected to pay for it, at $125 an hour plus GST. To finish, he had to write two essays, including 1,000 words on structural racism in New Zealand health care. In almost 40 years of practice, nobody had complained about his care. The committee’s ruling noted he had “not yet” received a complaint. He sat through all twelve sessions and refused to write the essays, on a matter of principle. Dr Smylie now practises overseas. Health NZ is short of doctors and recruiting from abroad. The Medical Council has driven one out over a private email. Dr Smylie tells the full story on Free to Speak: youtu.be/Hn1ahDIwf6k?si=eeHh… Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142. youtu.be/Hn1ahDIwf6k?si=eeHh… Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142.
4
3
28
568
An interesting ethical analysis of the use of puberty blockers. I'm amazed that NZMJ published something so critical!
"Ethical & evidential challenges in adolescent puberty blockade: why informed consent alone is not enough." nzmj.org.nz/journal/vol-139-…
1
1
5
111
Replying to @kaiviti_cam
He seems to have taken leave of his senses.
14
Replying to @Suitandtie9999
Her sneering contempt towards a victim advocacy group is very revealing.
12
192
Another must listen from the FSU on regulatory overreach. This matter could have been resolved with a simple apology, but the Medical Council subjected Dr Smylie to humiliating and demeaning struggle-session punishments, and ultimately drove a highly experienced GP out of NZ.
In November 2022, Waikato GP Dr David Smylie received a dinner invitation from a sales rep that opened “Ate Marie Everyone”. Late that night, he fired back a four-sentence private reply, joking about the typo and grumbling about the amount of te reo in her email. You might not agree with what Dr Smylie said, but it wasn’t sent to a colleague or a patient. Her manager complained to the Medical Council. Within days, Dr Smylie had written an apology. The Council never passed it on, at one point claiming it would “interfere with an active investigation”. When the rep was later interviewed and the committee chair floated a meeting with him, another member warned her off: “it’s tough calling out racism.” The Professional Conduct Committee found his comments “objectively racist, offensive, and insensitive”. Whether he meant any harm was “of little consequence”. His four sentences had “the potential to contribute to current health inequities”. The penalty was a year of what the Council called an “Educational Programme”: monthly sessions with a supervisor who reported back on him, readings on colonisation and institutional racism, and strategies for managing his “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. He was expected to pay for it, at $125 an hour plus GST. To finish, he had to write two essays, including 1,000 words on structural racism in New Zealand health care. In almost 40 years of practice, nobody had complained about his care. The committee’s ruling noted he had “not yet” received a complaint. He sat through all twelve sessions and refused to write the essays, on a matter of principle. Dr Smylie now practises overseas. Health NZ is short of doctors and recruiting from abroad. The Medical Council has driven one out over a private email. Dr Smylie tells the full story on Free to Speak: In November 2022, Waikato GP Dr David Smylie received a dinner invitation from a sales rep that opened “Ate Marie Everyone”. Late that night, he fired back a four-sentence private reply, joking about the typo and grumbling about the amount of te reo in her email. You might not agree with what Dr Smylie said, but it wasn’t sent to a colleague or a patient, and was remarkably minor. Her manager complained to the Medical Council. Within days, Dr Smylie had written an apology. The Council never passed it on, at one point claiming it would “interfere with an active investigation”. When the rep was later interviewed and the committee chair floated a meeting with him, another member warned her off: “it’s tough calling out racism.” The Professional Conduct Committee found his comments “objectively racist, offensive, and insensitive”. Whether he meant any harm was “of little consequence”. His four sentences had “the potential to contribute to current health inequities”. The penalty was a year of what the Council called an “Educational Programme”: monthly sessions with a supervisor who reported back on him, readings on colonisation and institutional racism, and strategies for managing his “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. He was expected to pay for it, at $125 an hour plus GST. To finish, he had to write two essays, including 1,000 words on structural racism in New Zealand health care. In almost 40 years of practice, nobody had complained about his care. The committee’s ruling noted he had “not yet” received a complaint. He sat through all twelve sessions and refused to write the essays, on a matter of principle. Dr Smylie now practises overseas. Health NZ is short of doctors and recruiting from abroad. The Medical Council has driven one out over a private email. Dr Smylie tells the full story on Free to Speak: youtu.be/Hn1ahDIwf6k?si=eeHh… Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142. youtu.be/Hn1ahDIwf6k?si=eeHh… Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142.
1
1
18
386
Today I’m wearing my keffiyeh jacket to show my solidarity with Gaza. Hand-finished in cashmere-and-silk bouclé, £3,250.
979
837
92
11,275
218,140
Here is a sample of Professor Dutta's peer reviewed work. Judge for yourself whether this is the work of a "credible academic".
Yes they were. 'On May 19, 2017, peer-reviewed journal Cogent Social Sciences published "The conceptual penis as a social construct", which argued that penises are not "male"; rather, they should be analyzed as social constructs instead.' en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grieva…
11
3
20
773
brashandmitchell.com/post/gr… "The very mention of “whānau” is meant to wash away a myriad of gang sins. Yet the view that that we should hate the sin while loving the sinner only goes so far when the sins include meth dealing, intimidation, bloody violence, sexual abuse and rape. In fact, it has been estimated that gang members — who make up a quarter of one per cent of New Zealand’s adult population — are linked to 18 per cent of all serious violent crime, 19 per cent of all homicides, 23 per cent of all firearms offences, 25 per cent of all kidnapping and abductions, and 25 per cent of all the crime harm caused by illicit drug offences. Their appalling treatment of women is no secret."
3
128
Why does the far-left always assume that its voters are the ones who aren’t organised enough to enrol? Seems a bit insulting.
I always vote on the first day. Today is the first day of voting so I went to the Wainuiomata advance voting place at the hall. It is closed. A disgrace. Along with early roll closing it is looking like the voter suppression you expect from Trump or Hungary not here in Aotearoa.
9
Replying to @ClintVSmith
Only your first two scenarios represent a threat to democratic legitimacy.
87
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt. “I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes? Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime. We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose. We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently. In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland. In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms. We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion. We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism. Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life. Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force. That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people. Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison. This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs. Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
294
2,952
149
15,038
232,494
Replying to @NZFreeSpeech
I think Professor Dutta has missed the joke here.
4
72
This is a must listen. A chilling insight into just how far these modern-day inquisitors will go to punish anyone who rejects their ideology. And the tyranny of the regulators will get far worse under Labour/Greens/TPM/TOP. Vote wisely.
Cath Simpson was a mental health nurse at Health NZ for 19 years. In her own time, on a personal X account, she posted about abortion law, gender identity and Pride. Many people would disagree with what Cath said, and without doubt, some of the posts were crude. She didn't say she was a nurse in the key posts, and never named Health NZ, a patient or a colleague. She deleted the posts more than a year ago and apologised. The Nursing Council prosecuted her anyway. The Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal censured her, suspended her for two months and ordered her into re-education: a postgraduate qualification, at her own cost, on “power and structural inequity” and “the impacts of colonisation”. The Tribunal found no evidence she was anything other than a capable nurse. Health NZ’s own decision letter accepted there was “no established incident of discriminatory care”. It had kept her on the frontline for 18 months knowing about the posts. Then, on 9 October, it sacked her without notice for serious misconduct. Health NZ has gone overseas to recruit mental health nurses. It has just sacked one with 19 years’ service. For the first time, Cath tells her story in full. Watch it, and share it 👇👇👇👇 youtu.be/2M7IqaFl1ZI Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142
3
69
Not sure that an academic who writes racist diatribes about “white mediocrity” and “whiteness” is in any position to be casting stones here.
2
8
212