Here is a sample of Professor Dutta's peer reviewed work. Judge for yourself whether this is the work of a "credible academic".
Yes they were.
'On May 19, 2017, peer-reviewed journal Cogent Social Sciences published "The conceptual penis as a social construct", which argued that penises are not "male"; rather, they should be analyzed as social constructs instead.'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grieva…
brashandmitchell.com/post/gr…
"The very mention of “whānau” is meant to wash away a myriad of gang sins. Yet the view that that we should hate the sin while loving the sinner only goes so far when the sins include meth dealing, intimidation, bloody violence, sexual abuse and rape.
In fact, it has been estimated that gang members — who make up a quarter of one per cent of New Zealand’s adult population — are linked to 18 per cent of all serious violent crime, 19 per cent of all homicides, 23 per cent of all firearms offences, 25 per cent of all kidnapping and abductions, and 25 per cent of all the crime harm caused by illicit drug offences. Their appalling treatment of women is no secret."
Not sure that an academic who writes racist diatribes about “white mediocrity” and “whiteness” is in any position to be casting stones here.
Good advice on how to resist the Newspeak of gender ideology.
How to Talk to Someone Who Is Still Inside the Spell, by @pittparents open.substack.com/pub/pitt/p…
This is an absurd argument. It is not discrimination to withhold a treatment that is not indicated for a particular condition, just because the treatment is indicated for other conditions.
rnz.co.nz/news/health/205856…
Yes. It’s interesting that Professor Schwerdtfeger is being hounded for a supposed transgression against “mana-enhancing civility”, when Dutta gets a free pass for “F*#%K CIVILITY”.
