Pinned Tweet
目前为止,上推以来看过最好的推文,所以置顶,这是上推5年来第二次置顶一篇推文,距离上一次置顶已经快3年了。
Tucker Carlson Exposed the Church’s Fear
A frightened church is very easy to lead.
Tucker Carlson recently said that many Christians wanted a protector in Donald Trump. Whatever one thinks of Carlson, that line might be exposing something revealing in the American church.
Fear has a way of making believers reach for protection before they ask what faithfulness requires.
That is why this moment in America is so dangerous for Christians. Under fear, a man excuses what once disgusted him. Once fear gets into the bloodstream, almost any kind of harshness starts to look like strength.
And that is where Jesus stands in our way.
When our Lord opens His mouth in Matthew 5, He does not give His disciples a strategy for preserving influence or a playbook for cultural retaliation.
Jesus does not give His disciples a strategy for controlling their enemies. He teaches them how to live when wronged and how to walk through a world that will misunderstand them, mock them, pressure them and sometimes hate them.
“Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth” (Matthew 5:38).
That line had been twisted by the religious teachers of the day. What God gave as a principle of public justice, they turned into a private license for revenge. They took the measured scales of justice and traded them for the hot pleasure of getting even.
Jesus pulls the knife out of that lie.
“But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil” (Matthew 5:39).
Christ is not setting justice aside. He is forbidding the bitter instinct for personal vengeance and teaching His people to live without the craving to strike back.
That word lands right in the middle of American Christianity.
A great many believers say they are standing for righteousness and some of them are. Yet somewhere in all the noise, a different spirit has started moving through the church. It is a spirit of quick contempt. It is rude, suspicious, easily provoked, hungry for humiliation, eager to crush an opponent rather than win a soul.
Fear dressed up as conviction is still fear.
The church in America is tempted to believe that survival depends on finding a protector powerful enough to guard our place. The New Testament keeps pulling our eyes elsewhere. Christ does not teach His people to panic when the world turns hostile. He calls them to holiness and teaches them to bear witness to another kingdom.
“Whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also” (Matthew 5:39). “Whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain” (Matthew 5:41).
These are not words for cowards. They are words for people so anchored in God that they do not need revenge. Christ is describing a soul that cannot be baited into becoming worldly in the very act of denouncing worldliness. He is describing a people who would rather suffer wrong than stain their witness with spite.
That is where many of us have lost our footing.
We have watched the country change. We have seen laws shift, morals erode, speech coarsen, and hostility toward Christian conviction grow bolder. Those dangers are real. Christians do not have to pretend otherwise.
Justice still matters. Truth in public life still matters. What children are taught and what a nation honors still matter. Public justice and law matter. The state has real responsibilities before God.
Yet the Christian heart must never confuse justice with personal malice. The believer may stand firm, speak plainly, vote carefully and contend earnestly, but a man who borrows the world’s sneer will soon start looking like the world.
Jesus presses further.
“Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy” (Matthew 5:43).
Then He says what no frightened tribe wants to hear: “But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).
That command tears through every politics-first version of Christianity.
Love your enemies.
Not surrender truth. Love your enemies. Pray for the people who would gladly push your faith to the margins. Do good to those who despise your convictions. Bless those who curse you. Speak truthfully, stand cleanly and leave behind the sour thrill of treating opponents like prey.
Why?
“For he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust” (Matthew 5:45).
Picture that. Morning light spilling across the porch of a man who mocks Christ. Rain settling into the fields of people who use God’s name as profanity. Bread on the table of families who never bow their heads in gratitude. Breath in lungs that will spend the day denying the One who gave it.
And still the sun rises and the rain falls. Still God is kind.
Jesus says that God is your Father. Then this is the family likeness He expects from His children.
The church loses her beauty when she forgets that. A church can keep its slogans and lose its witness. It can cling to its tribe and lose the tone of Christ. It can preserve a political identity while its spiritual aroma turns sharp and cold.
The world already knows how to hate…how to curse, mock, caricature and strike back. When the church does the same thing with a cross around its neck, she has not become bold. She has become ordinary.
There is a reason Jesus closes this section with words that tower over the whole chapter: “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48).
That is the mark before us. We are meant to look like our Father.
And here is where every honest Christian has to stop and lower his eyes. Who has loved enemies like this? Who has prayed for persecutors with a clean heart? Who has kept his tongue from the acid of contempt and moved through this angry age with steady holiness and no mixture of fear?
Few of us have.
That is why the end of this article cannot be a command to try harder and do better. The end must be Christ.
Because the One who said, “Love your enemies,” did exactly that. He was reviled and did not revile in return. He was struck, mocked, falsely accused, spat upon, crowned with thorns, nailed to wood outside the city walls, and in that hour He prayed, “Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34).
The world gave Him hatred. He answered with mercy. The guilty drove in the nails. He opened the door of pardon with His blood.
This is the gospel for a frightened church.
Our hope is not finally in a protector who can preserve our rights. Our hope is in a Savior who forgives our sins, kills our fear and remakes our hearts. Jesus did not come merely to improve our tone. He came to rescue rebels, cleanse the bitter, humble the proud and give new hearts to people who have loved power more than holiness.
At the cross, fearful sinners can be forgiven. At the empty tomb, fearful sinners can be changed.
The church in America needs less panic and more holiness.
The church must come back to Christ, repent of fear and hatred, repent of looking so much like the world while claiming to oppose it and feel the steadying power of the gospel again.
Because when a man knows that Christ has loved him at his worst, he can stop grasping for a worldly protector.
He has already found his refuge.
Yang Michael retweeted
Replying to @daodech
📖 「要愛具體的人,不要只愛抽象的人類。」
剛看到一位互關的 #基督徒 #牧師,談到 #陀思妥耶夫斯基 的《#卡拉馬佐夫兄弟們》,以及基督教信仰中一個深刻的問題:
為什麼我們可以宣稱愛全人類、愛教會、愛罪人,卻常常無法愛身邊那個真實、有缺點,甚至讓自己感到不舒服的人?
我很認同。但我想再往前推進一步:
愛具體的人,不僅要經得起具體行動的檢驗,也必須經得起公正原則的檢驗。
愛一個人,不等於認可他的罪;反對一個人的罪,也不等於否定他的人格尊嚴與基本權利。
真正的愛,不應因對方的宗教、種族、政治立場或群體標籤,就改變基本的道德標準。
我們應根據具體行為與證據判斷責任,而不是根據身分預先決定善惡。
《雅各書》反對偏待人;耶穌教導愛仇敵;好撒瑪利亞人的比喻,更讓愛跨越了宗教與群體的界線。
那麼,一個更值得基督徒反思的問題是:
如果我們願意為教會弟兄打開錢包,卻不願公平對待一位穆斯林、無神論者,或者政治立場與自己相反的人,我們所實踐的究竟是基督教之愛,還是群體內部的偏愛?
這不是要求我們對所有人承擔完全相同的照顧義務,而是要求我們不能因個人好惡,改變對他人基本尊嚴、自由與權利的尊重。
最近 Abdul El-Sayed 與一位自稱基督徒的 Tommy 的公開交鋒,就是一個生動的例子。
El-Sayed 是穆斯林。面對 Tommy 對其宗教忠誠的質疑,他仍明確表示:
他願意捍衛 Tommy 按照基督教信仰生活的自由,卻也追問 Tommy 是否願意同樣捍衛自己的宗教自由。
這場交鋒真正重要的,不是誰更懂憲法、誰的辯論技巧更高明,而是:
當一個人不認同我們,甚至敵視我們時,我們是否仍願意保障他與自己同等的自由?
這讓我想起美國宗教自由史上的基督徒牧師 Roger Williams。
1635年,他因反對政府強制宗教信仰、主張良心自由等立場,被清教徒建立的馬薩諸塞灣殖民地驅逐。
歷史的反諷是:一些曾遭受宗教壓迫的人,在取得政治權力後,自己又開始迫害宗教異見者。
曾經遭受迫害,不代表掌權後就不會迫害別人;自稱基督徒,也不代表自然懂得尊重別人的自由。
這正是為什麼基督教倫理中的愛,與現代憲政制度所保障的宗教自由、法律平等保護和正當程序,可以彼此呼應。
當然,兩者並不相同:基督教的愛涉及個人的道德責任,憲法主要約束國家公權力。
但它們都提醒我們:
不能讓個人好惡、宗教身分或政治標籤,取代公正的判斷。
當標籤取代證據,偏見便成了審判;當群體身分取代平等權利,憲政制度便開始腐朽。
這種思維一旦制度化,受到侵蝕的不只是自由民主,也包括基督教自身的倫理、自由市場所依賴的公平規則、社會信任,以及不同信仰者和平共處的可能。
因為自由市場不要求交易雙方彼此喜歡;民主社會也不要求所有公民信仰相同。
它們共同需要的,是一套不因身分而改變、人人可以信賴的基本規則。
回到《約翰一書》3:16–17:
約翰以第17節具體的憐憫,檢驗第16節捨命之愛的真實性。
我想再補充一個檢驗:
我們是否只願意愛自己認同的人,卻不願公正對待那些與自己不同的人?
愛具體的人,是讓愛不再停留於口號。
公正地對待每一個具體的人,是讓愛不再淪為偏私。
真正成熟的基督教之愛,不僅應當反對仇恨,也應警惕以愛之名維護自己的群體特權。
🔥 愛不是取消善惡的界線,而是拒絕讓身分與偏見取代善惡的判斷。
最深刻的愛,不是只愛那些值得自己喜歡的人,而是即使反對一個人,也不剝奪他應有的尊嚴與自由。
📜 Roger Williams 被驅逐的歷史資料(美國國家公園管理局):
nps.gov/rowi/learn/historycu…
「要愛具體的人,不要愛抽象的人類」
這是一句對陀思妥耶夫斯基在其名著《卡拉馬佐夫兄弟》的一段反話的詮釋性概括。
我們可以很愛教會,卻受不了教會裡某個弟兄;可以熱情地談論愛罪人,卻不願意接近身邊那個讓我們不舒服的人。
最近,我一直思考,為什麼信仰中許多看似崇高的理念,一旦進入具體生活,就成了巨大的挑戰。
幾個月前,我寫過一篇文章〈愛抽象的,卻懼怕真實的罪人〉,在《舉目》發表。我們很容易談論愛罪人,卻未必願意接近那些真實、有缺點,甚至讓我們感到不舒服的人。
幾天前,我又讀到《今日基督教》一篇文章〈你無法「抽象地」愛教會〉。作者 Matthew D. Love 提出了類似的反思。
我們很容易從神學上理解大公教會,也很容易宣稱愛基督的身體。但面對一間具體的地方教會,可能就不一樣了。那裡有差異、衝突和責任;有讓你頭痛的弟兄,有談不攏的同工會,也有許多瑣碎卻不得不處理的服事。
兩週前去北加帶聚會,我講到約翰壹書3章16–17節:「16主為我們捨命,我們從此就知道何為愛;我們也當為弟兄捨命,17凡有世上財物的、看見弟兄窮乏、卻塞住憐恤的心、愛 神的心怎能存在他裡面呢。」
我說,愛不是抽象的理念,也不只是心理上的感受。基督在十字架上為我們捨命,向我們顯明了什麼是愛。
「為弟兄捨命」似乎太崇高、太遙遠了。但,約翰沒有把愛停留在這個高度,而是在17節立刻把愛帶回日常生活:有世上財物的人,看見弟兄窮乏,卻塞住憐恤的心,愛神的心怎能存在他裡面呢?
這不是降低愛的標準,而是用17節的具體來檢驗16節的大愛。如果連錢包都不肯打開,憑什麼說自己願意捨命?
我們可以熱愛宏大的使命,卻不願向身邊的人傳福音;可以熱愛普世教會,卻無法忍受地方教會的不完美;可以高談愛罪人,卻不願走近那個真實的罪人。
真正的考驗,是那些抽象的宣告,如何關聯到眼前具體的人。
Yang Michael retweeted
‘Absolutely stunning!’ Data Analyst Stunned At Trump’s Disastrous 91% Disapproval Rating With Voters Under 30:
“The worst I have ever seen in any poll, on any issue for any president”
Yang Michael retweeted
《圣彼得在狱中》
是荷兰画家伦勃朗1631年的作品。
画中的老人,就是基督教传统中的圣彼得。
他被关在昏暗的牢房里,低着头,双手交握。
伦勃朗没有画他的愤怒,也没有画他的挣扎。
只是让一道光落在他的头发、脸和双手上。
剩下的大部分空间,都沉入黑暗。
而就在他的脚边,放着两把钥匙。
为什么是钥匙?
因为在基督教艺术中,钥匙是圣彼得的重要象征。
它代表着“天国的钥匙”。
于是你再回头看这幅画,就会发现一个非常有意思的矛盾:
一个象征着“天国钥匙”的人,此刻却被锁在了人间的牢房里。
这可能就是伦勃朗最厉害的地方。
他没有用很多东西告诉你"这个人正在受苦"。
只用了:
一个老人、一束光、两把钥匙,以及大片的黑暗。
画面越安静,反而越让人觉得沉重。
这也是为什么伦勃朗的画,几百年之后再看,依然很有力量。
真正高级的绘画,不一定需要复杂的场景。
有时候,一束光就夠了⋯(摘文)
Yang Michael retweeted
Sergiu Ciochina———
一位把光当作叙事主体的艺术家
山川草木都只是光的载体
他把清晨的雾光
午后的碎光
黄昏的暖光重新调度
排布
让光线成为画面的叙事主体
Yang Michael retweeted
水彩作品欣賞———
如果说油画是大地,厚重而炽烈;那么水彩,便更像天空。它轻盈、透明、安静,仿佛一场落在纸上的梦。
水彩最大的魅力,在于它的“呼吸感”。
阳光能够穿透颜色,空气能够停留在纸面之上。它不像其他绘画那样追求绝对的覆盖。水彩始终保留着一种透明的诚实。每一笔都无法完全重来。水流向哪里,颜色停在哪里,都带着命运般的偶然。而这,恰恰像人生⋯(摘)
Yang Michael retweeted
Trump’s approval rating has dropped in every religious group since the beginning of his second term.
Today, White evangelical Protestants are the only religious group in which more people approve than disapprove of Trump’s job performance (58% vs. 40%).
Yang Michael retweeted
前世界银行副行长:AI科技革命反而会拖累经济,科技乐观主义迟早要幻灭
美国人工智能公司Anthropic首席执行官达里奥·阿莫迪(Dario Amodei)预言,AI将把美国GDP增速从目前约2%推高至10%至15%。埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)则认为,明年美国经济增速就会翻倍,达到4%以上。
对此,前世界银行副行长毫不客气第表示:这即便不是妄想,也是幻觉。
10月16日,前世界银行副行长、牛津大学马丁学院首任院长、牛津大学全球化与发展教授伊恩·戈尔丁(Ian Goldin)在报业辛迪加(Project Syndicate)撰文指出,AI未必能拉动增长,反而可能拖累经济。它会把财富和机会集中到少数城市,同时摧毁历来推动全球发展的低成本岗位,最终让世界变得更穷、更分裂。
戈尔丁指出,发达经济体的大量经济活动集中在育儿与养老、建筑、酒店及个性化服务等AI难以提升效率的领域。制造业和法律、银行等行业约占美英经济的20%,即便AI让这些行业的生产率翻倍,总产出也只会增加20%。
戈尔丁还认为,AI本身可能拖累增长。数据中心耗电推高能源价格,可能令通胀和利率居高不下。AI基础设施投资已达2.4万亿美元,仅英伟达就承诺在俄亥俄州投入1050亿美元。在他看来,泡沫破裂只是时间问题,届时养老储蓄和消费信心都将受挫,甚至可能引发衰退。
就业冲击同样严峻。戈尔丁所在的牛津研究团队估计,英美多达50%的工作岗位面临被自动化取代的风险,而新岗位往往需要不同的技能,地点也远离被淘汰的岗位。
受冲击最大的,可能是根本没有参与AI竞赛的国家。世界银行在《2026年世界发展报告》中称,AI为发展中国家提供了一条难得的致富之路。戈尔丁不以为然。他指出,机器人正在取代流水线工人,聊天机器人威胁着全球逾1700万名呼叫中心员工的饭碗,而这些低成本岗位恰恰是发展阶梯最底层的台阶。非洲每年需要新增2100万个就业岗位才能跟上人口增长,撒哈拉以南非洲却已比十年前贫穷了3.4%。
戈尔丁并不主张放弃AI,它已经在加快新药研发。但他提醒,工业革命用了一个世纪才让多数英国人的生活得到改善,而AI的变革速度要快得多。这一次,留给各国纠偏的时间远没有那么长。
Yang Michael retweeted
Lucy, an incredible 15-year-old blind and neurodivergent pianist from Yorkshire, performed Bach’s beautiful “Prelude in C” alongside her teacher, Daniel, before an audience of 6,000 at the Royal Albert Hall.
Bach himself might have shed tears if he had lived to hear her perform this piece. Tears of amazement. Tears for a young girl who lives with blindness yet has been blessed with a soul that expresses such beauty through her music.
Yang Michael retweeted
I have to admit, I always wondered what this part of Psalm 23 meant. I thought “He anoints my head with oil” was figurative language for God keeping the Psalmist healthy. I never knew this parallel.
Anoint my head with oil
“Sheep can get their head caught in briers and die trying to get untangled. There are horrid little flies that like to torment sheep by laying eggs in their nostrils which turn into worms and drive the sheep to beat their head against a rock, sometimes to death. Their ears and eyes are also susceptible to tormenting insects. So the shepherd anoints their whole head with oil. Then there is peace. That oil forms a barrier of protection against the evil that tries to destroy the sheep. Do you have times of mental torment? Do the worrisome thoughts invade your mind over and over? Do you beat your head against a wall trying to stop them? Have you ever asked God to anoint your head with oil? He has an endless supply! His oil protects and makes it possible for you to fix your heart, mind, and eyes on Him today and always! There is peace in the valley! May our good good Father anoint your head with oil today so that your cup overflows with blessings! God is good and He is faithful!!”
Yang Michael retweeted
Ancient pagans sacrificed their children to Molech in the fire. Yet here is a child who survived an abortion, cried out for life and was drowned.
“They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to the demons.” Psalm 106:37
Molech never went away.
Abortionist Drowned a 34-Week-Old Baby Who Survived Abortion in a Bucket of Water lifenews.com/2020/04/15/abor…
Yang Michael retweeted
Bowhead whales travel long distance below heavy ice and if no open water is available they find the thinnest ice in the area and push it up with the top of their head, breaking the ice to form a breathing hole
[📹 dailywhaledose]
Yang Michael retweeted
"Crown Shyness" is a natural phenomenon where the uppermost branches of certain tree species completely refuse to touch one another, creating a perfectly defined, puzzle-like canopy.
































