Most of your community has proven to be basically illiterate so I'll spell it out for you again. The entire purpose of Kfirs post below is to frame Canton launch as fair and not self-serving. Yet... "Canton Launched with 0 CC" - A lie of omission: Canton was Launched for a very small group of founders, insiders and participants with 0 CC. In the noble framing, the only lauch that matters is the public launch. By public launch, 100% of the supply, 35 Billion CC, was in the hands of select insiders. "No founders coins, no investors coins" - Blatant lie: The founders, Investors and later early participants rewarded themselves with 35 Billion CC prior to public launch. "No ICO" - Paltering: Creating a private distribution of 35 Billion CC prior to there being any market for CC is worse than an ICO. At least an ICO is public. "Would you prefer if we minted 100b coins to ourselves" - Misleading framing: 100b is irrelevant. He and the rest of his close partners minted 35b or 100% of the supply for themselves. Materially no different than a premine of 100b, except the projects he tried to criticize here didn't continue to inflate their supply as CC is doing. "that early inflation schedule looked crazy" - Hypocrisy/Special Pleading: Criticizing Bitcoins early inflation of only a few million coins, while inflating the supply of his own coin to 35 billion coins prior to launch, if probably the most ridiculous claim of his whole post. He is talking to retail, who had no opportunity to participate or aquire CC prior to public launch like he and his close associates did. He thinks the people listening to him are idiots. Most seem to be idiots because it's a community outsider who is the only one calling out his deception.

Not reading that cope post