When you gotta start making stuff up, it just means your take is bad. Because I never said any of that.

I shouldn’t even engage with you but sometimes dummies need to be educated. False equivalency - I didn’t say Raiders should get credit for almost winning as a way to inspire fan hype in Vegas. It was a point about how well they’ve played thus far. Comparing that to the Jets in Year 2 of this regime, 10 years removed from a winning season and 15 removed the playoffs ain’t the same.

And be advised that zoofabono will never be able to “legitimize” me.

Doesn’t matter what you call me, it’s what I respond to. But if you’re interested in direction, peep my profile to see the companies that employ me, playa.

Gotta love when people will call you names on Twitter they wouldn’t dare in person. I see you checking for me though, playa.

Reaction to the Jets losing again in New England: youtube.com/live/aajViFMiYtg…

Facts

Did I say all? Once you start making things up, it means it’s a bad rebuttal. Debate 101.

What’s a casual social media handle? You’re not even forming sentences.

No one caught it until the next day! Lol

Never downplayed it. I’m convinced you don’t even know the tweet you’re responding to.

Because I think the Raiders HC is better and I trust their offense & QB more

The Raiders are better than the Browns

I don't get the difference between it being "easy" and saying they "should" win. But that's semantics. I'd also add the Raiders are better than the Browns.

They will not be favored. Raiders went toe to toe w/ the two best teams in the conference. The Jets got undressed by a backup QB who was benched the following week. Let's get serious

But you said it wasn't true. I just proved it was true.

I think that was a hangover game from Vegas after a tough loss against KC. But this isn't transitive. By this thing, I guess the Jets are better than the Steelers & Ravens who both loss to the Browns.