Replying to @johnrich
Ignored clot from soft tissue injury is the cause,
worsened being minimized by d!psh!ts profiting on performance over precaution..😎
Replying to @VinnysCorner1
Are you kidding me?
Everyone is culpable for the product performing
at all costs…😎
Replying to @grok @AmericaPapaBear
Good call, badly framed and misleading question …😎
Replying to @AmericaPapaBear @grok
It’s outrageous and malpractice…😎
DocThomWood retweeted
What Elon Musk just announced is revolutionary. To understand why, you have to go back to July.
In July, Zanny Minton Beddoes, editor-in-chief of The Economist, sat down with Musk. He told her what he's been saying for years: AI and robots will create an age of abundance. Not universal basic income. Universal high income.
She asked the question every economist asks: "Where's the revenue coming from?" If you just issue checks, you get inflation.
At the time, even Musk gave the old answer: the Treasury should issue checks.
This morning, he gave a completely different one. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. The first of many.
Not printed money. Ownership of the value itself. That's the real answer to her question. The revenue comes from where the value is created.
And in the age of AI, where is value created? In private companies. Not in ministries, not in agencies, not in parliaments. The models, the robots, the chips, the energy, the rockets. Almost every productivity explosion of the next twenty years will happen inside companies that build.
Once you understand that, the question of the century changes. It's no longer "will there be abundance?" It's "how do we share it?"
There are only two models.
In the first, the State sits in the middle. It taxes the companies that create value, then redistributes it. Every dollar passes through politicians, agencies, committees, lobbies. It arrives late, it arrives smaller, and it arrives captured. And it's inflationary by nature, because the State injects money without owning any of the production behind it.
In the second, the entrepreneur distributes directly. Those who create the value hand ownership of it to citizens. No intermediary. Your income grows at the speed of the value being created. And deflation stops being your enemy: when AI drives the cost of everything toward zero, you're not holding a fixed check that politicians forgot to index. You own the machine that's driving prices down.
We already know the State is a useless layer. Everything it touches becomes unaffordable: housing, tuition, healthcare. Everything it leaves alone gets cheaper and better every year.
And in the age of superintelligence, that layer becomes even more absurd. Musk believes AI will exceed the intelligence of all humans combined within five years. In that world, what exactly is the function of a bureaucracy whose job is to take from one hand and give to the other, slowly, taking its cut along the way? The State was a slow layer in a slow world. In an exponential world, it's a bottleneck.
QED: Elon Musk is disrupting the State.
Not by fighting it. By making it unnecessary. It's the same playbook he's always run. He didn't lobby NASA to get better, he built SpaceX. He didn't beg carmakers to go electric, he built Tesla. He's not asking the State to redistribute better. He's building the alternative, and letting everyone compare.
In 2008, everyone bet he'd go bankrupt. They bet rockets would never land. They bet electric cars would never sell.
Now they're betting the State is irreplaceable.
Don't bet against Elon.
Two days ago I wrote about a mechanism: everything the state touches becomes unaffordable, and the young people suffering from it blame capitalism instead of the state.
This morning, Elon Musk announced he'll give one SpaceX share to every kid in America. And this is the move that breaks that mechanism completely.
Go back to Mark Perry's chart. At the top, what explodes: housing, tuition, healthcare, childcare. Sectors where the state subsidizes demand and blocks supply. At the bottom, what collapses: TVs, phones, software. Sectors where companies compete to serve you better and cheaper.
Now look at the two models of universal income through that chart.
The state model sends you a check. A check is subsidized demand. And we know exactly what happens when you subsidize demand without freeing supply: prices rise to swallow it. Give everyone $1,000 a month while building permits stay blocked, and landlords capture it within two years. The state check feeds the top of the chart. It's the same mechanism that made tuition explode, applied to an entire economy.
Musk's model gives you ownership. Not a check, a stake in the machine at the bottom of the chart, the deflation machine. When AI and robots drive the cost of almost everything toward zero, you're not waiting for a politician to vote you a raise. You own the thing that's creating the abundance.
But the real checkmate is narrative.
The whole system runs on one story: the capitalist is the villain. The boss, the rich, the multinational. Schools tell it, universities tell it, subsidized culture tells it. Because the system will never name itself as the culprit.
What happens to that story when the richest man in the world puts a piece of his company in the hands of every child in the country?
It collapses. A 12-year-old who owns SpaceX doesn't grow up reading the world as oppressor versus oppressed. He grows up as an owner. He watches his share move when a rocket lands. He understands, in his gut and not from a textbook, that value comes from people who build, not from people who redistribute.
You can't make capital the enemy when capital is in your account. You can't attack a gift to children without exposing what you're really defending: the intermediary. The bureaucrat. The middle layer that lives off the gap between those who create and those who receive.
That's the checkmate. Not an argument. Not a debate. Musk isn't trying to convince this generation that the state is the problem. He's making the state irrelevant, and letting them see it for themselves.
The last generation learned to protest against those who create.
The next one will grow up owning them.
Replying to @scitechgirl
I have lived on both ends of the knife, treating and having chronic back pain. Pilates is single best solution. Add an exercise ball daily for easy tuneups, perpetually….😎
DocThomWood retweeted
I guess I became Anti-Islam when I saw them behead Christians, burn people alive, chant death to America, stone women,
throw gays from rooftops, attack women with acid, practice female genital mutilation, enslave women,
and force child marriage.
And that's the short list.
What about you?
DocThomWood retweeted
Physics already told us time isn’t fixed. Einstein proved it bends near gravity, stretches at speed, moves differently depending on where you’re standing. But here’s the version nobody puts in the textbooks: your brain does the exact same thing.
When you’re bored, a minute feels like an hour. When you’re in flow — completely locked into something — hours vanish like seconds. When you’re a kid experiencing everything for the first time, summers feel infinite. When you’re an adult running the same routine on autopilot, entire years disappear before you notice.
The scary truth? Most people aren’t running out of time. They’re running out of moments worth remembering.
Your brain doesn’t store time. It stores experiences. A year of the same routine gets compressed into almost nothing in memory. A single fully-present afternoon can feel like it lasted forever.
So the actual hack for a longer life isn’t a supplement or a sleep tracker. It’s attention. Novelty. Presence. Doing things that force your brain to actually pay attention instead of running on autopilot.
The more you notice, the longer you live. Not in years — in depth.
DocThomWood retweeted
Replying to @KettlebellDan
GLP has been around for a very long time. As for people not looking healthy on them they took it too far. Being anorexic will do the same thing to a person.
Replying to @pvtjokerus
I recently attended one in Belleville NJ
that included honoring my Aunt Georgette …😎
DocThomWood retweeted
Citizen journalist Nick Shirley is proving to be worth his weight in gold when it comes to exposing the truth about people in power.
His latest investigation led him down the road of a 10-year-old grant from USAID to Malia Obama that "fact-checkers" said was "misinformation."
"The only misinformation was the system and the media trying to cover for her," said Shirley on his podcast, "Public records from FOIA don't lie."
Shirley says he plans to present his evidence to both the FBI and his congressman, Jim Jordan.
"Taxpayers deserve answers."
What's your response to this......??👀
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON X. LET’S GO 👏
Replying to @VinnysCorner1 @ThrillaRilla369
All 4 of mine are too..
Coincidence?
I think so..😎
DocThomWood retweeted
I’d love to see Nancy’s financial transactions— wouldn’t you?
🚨BREAKING: President Trump wants a look in Nancy’s books and a full investigation of her perfectly-timed stock trades.
They write the laws — then profit off the fallout.
That’s not “public service” — that’s legalized corruption .
Do you firmly support Trump on this?
A. Huge Yes
B. No
IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏














