DocThomWood retweeted
I guess I became Anti-Islam when I saw them behead Christians, burn people alive, chant death to America, stone women,
throw gays from rooftops, attack women with acid, practice female genital mutilation, enslave women,
and force child marriage.
And that's the short list.
What about you?
DocThomWood retweeted
Physics already told us time isn’t fixed. Einstein proved it bends near gravity, stretches at speed, moves differently depending on where you’re standing. But here’s the version nobody puts in the textbooks: your brain does the exact same thing.
When you’re bored, a minute feels like an hour. When you’re in flow — completely locked into something — hours vanish like seconds. When you’re a kid experiencing everything for the first time, summers feel infinite. When you’re an adult running the same routine on autopilot, entire years disappear before you notice.
The scary truth? Most people aren’t running out of time. They’re running out of moments worth remembering.
Your brain doesn’t store time. It stores experiences. A year of the same routine gets compressed into almost nothing in memory. A single fully-present afternoon can feel like it lasted forever.
So the actual hack for a longer life isn’t a supplement or a sleep tracker. It’s attention. Novelty. Presence. Doing things that force your brain to actually pay attention instead of running on autopilot.
The more you notice, the longer you live. Not in years — in depth.
DocThomWood retweeted
Replying to @KettlebellDan
GLP has been around for a very long time. As for people not looking healthy on them they took it too far. Being anorexic will do the same thing to a person.
DocThomWood retweeted
Citizen journalist Nick Shirley is proving to be worth his weight in gold when it comes to exposing the truth about people in power.
His latest investigation led him down the road of a 10-year-old grant from USAID to Malia Obama that "fact-checkers" said was "misinformation."
"The only misinformation was the system and the media trying to cover for her," said Shirley on his podcast, "Public records from FOIA don't lie."
Shirley says he plans to present his evidence to both the FBI and his congressman, Jim Jordan.
"Taxpayers deserve answers."
What's your response to this......??👀
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON X. LET’S GO 👏
DocThomWood retweeted
I’d love to see Nancy’s financial transactions— wouldn’t you?
🚨BREAKING: President Trump wants a look in Nancy’s books and a full investigation of her perfectly-timed stock trades.
They write the laws — then profit off the fallout.
That’s not “public service” — that’s legalized corruption .
Do you firmly support Trump on this?
A. Huge Yes
B. No
IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏
DocThomWood retweeted
イーロン・マスク「最も起こりやすい未来(確率80%)では、人類全員が仕事を失う」
「ただしそれは絶望ではなく『超・高収入(Universal High Income)』の世界だ。モノもサービスも無限に手に入る」――世界一の富豪が確率80%と見積もる「労働消滅社会」の真実
「『AIに仕事を奪われて路頭に迷う』と怯える大衆に対し、世界一の富豪が提示した全く逆のシナリオ」
イーロン・マスクが欧州最大のテックイベント「VivaTech」で明かした、AIがもたらす「良性シナリオ(確率80%)」の全貌がコレ👇
・「誰も働く必要がない世界」がやってくる
「人類にとって都合の良いシナリオ(Benign Scenario)に進んだ場合、我々の誰一人として仕事を持つ必要はなくなる」。マスク曰く、この楽観的な未来が訪れる確率は約80%と、圧倒的に本命ルートであると予測。
ギリギリ食いつなぐ「ベーシックインカム」は不要
生活保護の延長のような最低限の「ユニバーサル・ベーシックインカム(UBI)」ではなく、全員が富裕層のように潤う「ユニバーサル・ハイインカム(超・高収入)」が実現する。
「モノとサービスの欠乏」が地球上から完全消滅
AIとロボットが24時間365日休まずに生産・供給し続けるため、地球上の誰もが望むだけのモノや最高峰の医療・サービスに無制限でアクセスできるようになる。「お金が足りない」「物が買えない」という概念そのものが地球上から消え去る。
問題は「生きるための金」ではなく「生きる意味」へ
生活の不安がゼロになり、仕事が完全に個人の「趣味(オプション)」になったとき、人類の関心は「どうやって稼ぐか」から「すべての労働をAIが完璧にこなす世界で、自分は何のために生きるのか?」という哲学的な問いへとシフトする。
要するに、「『AIに職を奪われて貧困に苦しむ』というのは的外れな心配であり、80%の確率で訪れる未来は『全員が超・高収入になり、あらゆる富が余り散らかすことで、働くこと自体が完全な趣味になる世界』であるため、将来の人間が本当に心配すべきなのは金欠ではなく【暇と生きがいの見つけ方】である」ということです。
DocThomWood retweeted
When Trump came down the escalator, the first thing he did was to identify the traitors in this party
Bush and Rove were at the top of that list
Now, both are supporting Democrats in Texas
It's official now.... Trump was right, from day one
DocThomWood retweeted
Elon Musk just threw out IQ scores, degrees, and fancy vocabulary in one sentence. His definition of intelligence is brutal and simple: how accurately can you predict what happens next?
Not how fast you read. Not how many books you’ve finished. Not how well you debate. Just — were you right about the future?
Think about it. A chess grandmaster sees 20 moves ahead. A great investor sees where markets go before they get there. A great engineer sees failure points before they fail. They’re not “smart” because of how they performed in school. They’re smart because reality keeps confirming their predictions.
And the same applies to AI. Elon doesn’t care how fluently a model writes or how impressive it sounds. He wants to know: does it get the future right?
By that metric, most of what we call intelligence is just confidence wearing a costume.
DocThomWood retweeted
These toxic NGOs must have their tax exempt status revoked
DocThomWood retweeted
Tiger Woods Unimpressed With Roadster As He's Flipped Dozens Of Vehicles buff.ly/dUGarJ0
Replying to @Hunter_Eagleman
Without dogs, human history and daily life would look radically different. No herding partners means slower livestock domestication and agriculture. Hunting stays less efficient. Neighborhoods quieter, no pet parks or chewed furniture, but also far less companionship, protection, and emotional support. Wolves and wild canids fill more niches. Overall: a lonelier, less bonded world for people.
DocThomWood retweeted
A shoemaker's son who left school at 16 wrote a book in 1854 that nobody knew what to do with, and 83 years later a 21-year-old at MIT opened it and found the blueprint for every computer chip on Earth.
I went down this rabbit hole at 1am and I still can't get over how thin the thread is.
His name was George Boole. The book is called The Laws of Thought.
Boole never went to university. Not for a single day.
His father fixed shoes in Lincoln, England, and spent his spare money on telescopes and math books instead of the shop. The shop failed. At 16, George started teaching just to feed the family.
So he taught himself everything else at night.
At 14 he translated an ancient Greek poem into English. A local paper printed it. A schoolmaster wrote in to say no boy that age could have done it.
By 1849, a university in Ireland made him its first professor of mathematics. A man with no degree, now handing them out.
Then he asked a strange question. What if thinking follows rules, the same way numbers do?
Every argument you've ever had is built from statements that are either true or false. "It's raining." "I have an umbrella." Boole wanted to do math on those, the way you do math on 2 and 3.
So he built an algebra with only two numbers.
- 1 means true
- 0 means false
- AND works like multiplying
- OR joins two ideas together
- NOT flips one into the other
The whole system rested on one odd little equation. x times x equals x.
Try it with any normal number and it breaks. 5 times 5 is not 5. It only works for two numbers in the entire universe. Zero and one.
"Let us conceive, then, of an Algebra in which the symbols x, y, z, &c. admit indifferently of the values 0 and 1, and of these values alone."
That's Boole, in 1854.
Mathematicians found it clever. Philosophers argued about it. Nobody built a single thing with it.
Boole died ten years later at 49, after walking two miles to a lecture in pouring rain. He never saw his idea do anything useful.
Jump to 1936.
A 20-year-old named Claude Shannon is working on a giant calculating machine at MIT. It's packed with relays, little electrical switches that click open and shut. Wiring them together is mostly guesswork.
But Shannon had taken a philosophy class back at the University of Michigan. It covered Boole.
He looked at the switches and saw the 1s and 0s.
- A closed switch lets current through. That's 1.
- An open switch blocks it. That's 0.
- Two switches in a row only pass current if both are closed. That's AND.
- Two switches side by side pass current if either one is closed. That's OR.
Boole's algebra of thought was also an algebra of electricity. Same rules. Same two numbers.
Shannon wrote it up as his master's thesis in 1937. The psychologist Howard Gardner later called it possibly the most important master's thesis of the century.
Shannon just shrugged.
"It just happened that no one else was familiar with both fields at the same time."
Sit with that for a second. The idea was sitting in a library for 83 years. It only needed one person who happened to be standing in two rooms at once.
The phone in your hand holds billions of those switches. Every photo, every text, every AI answer is them flipping between 1 and 0, following rules a self-taught teacher wrote down before the light bulb existed.
Boole thought he was writing down how the human mind works.
He ended up writing down how machines would think.
DocThomWood retweeted
Encore une fois, Elon Musk avait raison. Et les scientifiques vont se prendre une vraie blessure narcissique.
Il y a deux mois, j'ai dîné avec un professeur de physique quantique à Normale Sup, l'une des meilleures écoles de France.
Il se présente avec cette phrase :
"Je suis le seul prof pas gauchiste dans un marécage de profs gauchistes décroissantistes."
Ses collègues sont tous anti-IA. La raison ? Ça consomme de l'eau.
Le mec est passionnant. On part très loin : l'espace, le temps, la conscience. Des discussions complètement perchées.
Et à un moment, il me lâche :
"Tu sais, depuis les années 70, aucun sujet vraiment sérieux en physique n'est financé."
Je lui demande ce qui est financé, alors.
"Des cathédrales théoriques. Magnifiques. Qui ne servent quasiment à rien."
Je lui demande pourquoi.
"Après tout ce qui s'est passé avec le nucléaire, le monde académique s'est imposé un principe de précaution. Il a peur de trouver des choses réellement profondes."
Relisez cette phrase.
La science a peur de trouver.
C'est exactement ce que décrit François Chollet aujourd'hui : la théorie des cordes, c'est ce qui arrive quand une intelligence est coupée du réel. Elle hallucine. Elle construit des cathédrales. Elon a répondu avec un seul emoji : 🎯
Ce n'est pas un accident. C'est une capture.
Je parle souvent de Gramsci. Son idée centrale : on ne prend pas le pouvoir par la force, on prend les institutions. Universités, médias, culture. Et une fois qu'on les tient, on décide de ce qui est pensable.
La recherche n'y a pas échappé. On finance ce qui est publiable, consensuel, sans risque. On ne finance plus ce qui pourrait tout changer.
C'est pour ça que beaucoup de gens en France pleurent en ce moment. Ils sentent que leur monde factice est en train de mourir. Ce monde où un titre suffisait. Où un statut remplaçait un résultat. Où l'on pouvait passer trente ans à écrire des papiers lus par douze personnes sans jamais se confronter au réel.
Elon l'a dit sans filtre : une grande partie des PhD ne servent à rien. Et chez xAI, il a supprimé le titre de "chercheur". Il n'y a que des ingénieurs.
Le message est limpide. On ne te paie pas pour chercher. On te paie pour trouver.
La science va devoir retrouver son vrai but. Pas produire des papiers. Pas décrocher des grants. Pas briller en colloque. Comprendre le réel, et le plier.
Et l'IA va accélérer tout ça brutalement. Quand l'intelligence devient abondante, elle n'est plus le goulot d'étranglement. Ce qui compte, c'est le courage de la confronter au monde physique, encore et encore.
Alors physiciens, mathématiciens : il est temps de vous sortir les doigts du cul et de créer de la vraie valeur pour le monde.
On veut l'antimatière.
On veut l'antigravité.
On veut le warp drive.
On veut comprendre la conscience au niveau de l'infiniment petit.
Les vrais sujets. Ceux qu'on a eu peur de toucher pendant cinquante ans.
La science a été capturée. Elle va être libérée.
Et ça va faire très mal à certains egos.
Replying to @RestrictedDaily
Consciousness is fundamental, not emergent from matter. The universe, God, and existence form one self-experiencing process. Evidence: quantum non-locality, the hard problem of consciousness, fine-tuning, and cross-cultural mystical reports of unity. Challenge: this may be untestable projection; physics succeeds without it. Humanity misses rigorous integration of first-person experience into science.
DocThomWood retweeted

Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfalOct 13
North America!
North AmericaConnected via West Asia App StoreLocation may be affected by a proxy or VPN.Account-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🔥🇺🇸 This is the PERFECT TIME to remind everyone that Kimberly Guilfoyle was once married to GAVIN NEWSOM!
Here she is getting groped by him on Ann Getty’s rug!
She’s the one on the right… in case you don’t recognize her now that she has the Mar-a-Lago face.
What a dumpster fire of a marriage that must have been!
Writer: Jamie




























