On this week's Undrafted, Jax is joined by Johnny Tooma to talk through: Brock Purdy vs. Jayden Daniels The JJ McCarthy trade window Devon Achane as a buy Parker Washington’s breakout Some WILD dynasty trades @DynoGameTheory @FantasyPicasso 🎙️ Episode 257 is out now.

RB Timeshare between Kyren and Corum Again Terrance Ferguson buzz, but caution as they will likely rotate quite a bit

It's genuinely hilarious that you think you have any kind of knowledge, experience, or expertise needed to properly rank and evaluate prospects. What qualifications or credibility do you have for anyone to put their trust in your evaluations? Then have the audacity to say I'm guessing based on box numbers and charts. The name is tongue in cheek because I don't think a self-proclaimed "film analyst" like yourself has any idea on how to evaluate prospects based off film. My argument for Lemon being a better prospect than Tyson goes far beyond him having his best game against tough opponents. - Lemon has far better ball skills than Tyson, as shown by his higher catch rate (75% to 61%), better contested catch rate (59% to 52%), and better drop rate (2.8% to 7.6%). - When adjusting for QB play, quarterbacks have shown a larger increase in production and efficiency targeting Lemon relative to his peers compared to Tyson relative to his peers. - Lemon shows a higher increase in catch rate, YPRR, and QB rating relative to his teammates when targeted compared to Tyson. - Lemon's efficiency numbers are significantly better compared to Tyson's. He has a higher QB rating when targeted (119.8 compared to 105.7), higher YPRR (3.02 to 2.71), and higher YPRR against Zone Coverage (3.22 to 2.39). Which matters, especially in context of fantasy football, because the NFL plays zone at a 70% rate. - Lemon has better career numbers, better yards per route, better PFF grade in the short and deep parts of the field than Tyson does. - The difference is YAC is so significant that there is genuinely no argument to be had. Lemon has 23 more missed tackles forced on 22 fewer receptions than Tyson. - A 26.3% forced missed tackle rate compared to Tyson's abysmal 8.2%. Also has a Higher YAC per reception. - This also matters because only 3 out of 31 receivers to record 800+ yards in 2025 had an avoided tackle rate below 10% in college: - George Pickens (7.8%) - Alec Pierce (7.5%) - Chris Olave (5.1%) Tyson is at 8.2%. Lemon is doing all of this while playing against much tougher competition than Tyson. Makai Lemon & Jordyn Tyson vs AP Top 25 Teams in 2025 Games: - Lemon: 4 - Tyson: 3 Total Stats: - Lemon: 30 rec | 356 yds | 4 tds - Tyson: 20 rec | 167 yds | 1 tds Averages: - Lemon: 7.5 rec | 89 yds | 1 td | 2.31 YPRR - Tyson: 6.7 rec | 55.7 yds | 0.33 tds | 1.82 YPRR So what exactly is your argument for Tyson being so much better than Lemon? Because that's your opinion based off watching "film" which in reality is probably you watching highlights of 4 or 5 games? Is that your expert opinion from your film evaluation that we should hold to a high standard? Or is it because the "NFL says so" with draft capital? Appealing to authority is one of the lowest forms of discourse, but if you want to go that route, feel free. I would love to hear your argument in favor of Tyson. Or is your "analysis" so shallow that you don't have much to provide other than shitty quips.