If you enjoy my work and would like to support my work, feel free to buy me a beer ๐บ โกโก https://xitter.cf/t.co/7WteqMfZTE
Worldwide
Joined March 2011
- Tweets4.8K
- Following2.9K
- Followers4.4K
- Likes8.3K
Steve McQueen retweeted
This week we`ll be publishing a book dedicated entirely to CfB - his worldview, his secrets, his goals, his desires, and, of course, the time machine.
@c___f___b
#Qubic
Steve McQueen retweeted
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒโฆ ๐ง
We donโt actually have AI (Artificial Intelligence) โ
We technically only have AK (Artificial Knowledge) โ
LLMโs such as Chat GPT & Grok are not true formโs of intelligence, they are just very sophisticated statistical pattern matching and next-best-token prediction from compressed training data and static databases.
They are based on knowledge and not actual intelligence. So can we really call them AI?
I say no, not technically...
"๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ, ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ปโ๐ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฑ๐ผ."
LLMโs know what to do because they are programmed to do so, but they are not really programmed through intelligence.
They exhibit emergent behaviors that look like reasoning, but lack genuine understanding or novel problem-solving without prior patterns (unlike human intelligence in truly unknown situations).
For example (as humans) we know that 1 + 1 โ=โ2 but we donโt actually work this out using our intelligence, we just work this out by our knowledge and memory.
๐๐ณ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ญ + ๐ญ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐: ๐๏ธ
Principia Mathematica proves 1 + 1 = 2 rigorously from pure logic and set theory, without assuming arithmetic.
๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ (๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฒ-๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐น๐น ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป):
โก๏ธ 1 = class of all unit classes (singletons)
โก๏ธ 2 = class of all pair classes
๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป *๐ฑ๐ฐ.๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐:
โก๏ธ If ฮฑ and ฮฒ are both unit classes (โ 1), then;
โก๏ธ ฮฑ โฉ ฮฒ = ฮ โ ฮฑ โช ฮฒ โ 2
๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ:
โก๏ธ ฮฑ = ฮน'x (singleton containing x)
โก๏ธ ฮฒ = ฮน'y (singleton containing y)
โก๏ธ If x โ y โ ฮฑ โฉ ฮฒ = empty set (ฮ)
Two distinct singletons with no common member โ their union has exactly two members โ belongs to 2
Later, cardinal addition is defined via disjoint unions.
Thus, adding two 1's (two distinct singletons) gives a class with two members โ equals 2.
People "know" 1+1 = 2 by memory, not by performing this logical construction each time.
The full formal proof builds on hundreds of prior propositions defining logic, classes, descriptions, and numbers.
True AI is when AI will actually be intelligent and work things out from intelligence, not from knowledge.
In order for that to happen, we need AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and that is something we do not have (yet).
๐ฆ๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐, ๐๐ต๐ผ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ (๐๐๐) ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐? ๐ฅ
Personally I believe that will be $QUBIC and I believe they will develop AGI via its Aigarth project, using Useful Proof-of-Work (UPoW) to direct mining power toward training decentralized Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs).
This decentralizes AI development, drawing from biological intelligence for self-evolving systems.
๐๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐น ๐ญ๐ฏ๐๐ต, ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ณ. ๐๏ธ
Steve McQueen retweeted
I'm afraid you are wrong buddy
I have looked into this and I wouldn't make it up
That test was a one-to-many test
Not a one-to-one test
$QUBIC isn't a leader in one-to-one true TPS testing
As outlined in that article, it could be pushed to number one with proper development
But $QUBIC team hasn't done that development from what I see and has instead been dishonest about the metric
I'm all about $QUBIC and I believe in it. I'm also not a fan of Valis and they have said some messed up things about me.
But, there points back then and there points recently about $QUBIC TPS are true from the information I have gathered
Unfortunately, I'm not a tech person so I can't run the test myself
Steve McQueen retweeted
I don't believe he wants to tidy up any messes
I believe he wants to let the system evolve naturally and make it into something self sustaining
Steve McQueen retweeted
Satoshi confirmed again, coincidence number 676
#SatoshiNakamoto #ComeFromBeyond
Steve McQueen retweeted
The Inevitable Success of QBOND: An Economic Thesis by METAFISICISTA
metafisicista.substack.com/pโฆ
Steve McQueen retweeted
According to CFB, asking her mathematical questions at this time is not advantageous in furthering @anna_aigarth's development. Correspondingly, correcting its wrong answers is pointless as well. Miners solely are what is creating her intelligence for now. $QUBIC and chill.
Steve McQueen retweeted
I often wonder, what is your motivation @valis when posting on my insignificant X account posts?
You guys are creating a project that appears to be really exciting and gathering pace
I don't think you are at a mass marketing point
And I don't think you would believe that commenting on my posts would market your project
I also think you are probably way to clever to be involved in "he said, she said" nonsense, or rescuing people
I think you are logical business people so I imagine most decisions you make are based on logic
And I don't see any logic in you commenting on my posts
So what is your reasoning?
Steve McQueen retweeted
People being tied to their emotions over being tied to logic is excellently put, and it is a fundamental downfall to people acting and perceiving things correctly within crypto, and of course life in general.
When people don't have a valid argument and fail or refuse to see or acknowledge the validity in someone else's argument, they do tend to resort and fall down to the lowest common denominator, which is to offer hollow and unintelligent, petty insults.
We can all do our best to try and have engaging conversations and to reach rational outcomes of agreement and understandings, but at the end of the day, they ultimately end up as energy vampires.
For people who refuse to see things from a logical perspective, you just have to wish them well and move on.
We know what $QUBIC is doing and where it is going, and that's what matters.
A whole new wave of investor onboarding is on it's way to $QUBIC and the community will be flooded with new participants who will be showing their excitement as to what they have discovered, just as we were in the early days of our discovery.
It is going to be energizing and explosive. Great times ahead for this incredible project and all those who are involved, that's for sure.
Steve McQueen retweeted
One Man. One Vision. One Crypto Revolution.
The founder of $QUBIC, Sergey Ivancheglo, aka @c___f___b, isnโt just an OG.
Heโs a legend who helped shape crypto from day one:
โข Invented the first working Proof-of-Stake
โข Launched the very first ICO
โข Built the first non-Bitcoin clone
โข Engineered the Tangle (now called DAG)
โข Delivered historic ROIs ( $IOTA : 614,933%, $NXT: 500,708%)
โข Has worked on AGI since 2002
Rumors link him to two of the earliest Bitcoin wallets:
โข The 4th ever created: 15ubicBBWFnvoZLT7GiU2qxjRaKJPdkDMG (Balance: 50 $BTC)
โข Created 10 days after Genesis: 1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg (Balance: 50 $BTC)
Some believe he might even be part of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Curious why people think he might be Satoshi? Here a good article ๐
xitter.cf/TheCryptoEscape/statusโฆ
Based on things heโs publicly said before:
โI own 400,000 BTC.โ
โI donโt need to work for 1000 years.โ
โI could instantly delete 4 zeros from $QUBICโs price.โ
His vision?
Change the world through AI and paracosms. Think of paracosms as entire imaginary worlds, built from scratch.
With his wealth, his track record, and his missionโฆ
I truly believe weโre standing at the edge of a global revolution!
Hey @Ryanbabel great to have you in the $QUBIC space
Just wondering how aware are you of the whole idea that $QUBIC creator CFB is actually $BTC Satoshi Nakamoto?
I know it sounds farfetched but he actually has by far the most cryptographic evidence of any candidate
If you have some time, here are some resources that I recommend checking out:
First evidence. The 15ubic address:
The 4th Bitcoin block was created on 9th of Jan 2009, 6 days after Bitcoin's creation
The address is as follows: 15ubicBBWFnvoZLT7GiU2qxjRaKJPdkDMG
You can see the details here: bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/adโฆ
Satoshi Nakamoto created something called base58, and in base58, the 15th capital letter is Q
For more details, you can ask chatGPT what base58 is and if the 15th capital letter is Q
And we also know that this address belongs to Satoshi, you can see the proof here: intel.arkm.com/explorer/addrโฆ
So basically, the 4th ever address created by Satoshi contains the word Qubic at the start
Second Evidence: The 1CFB address:
This address was created on the 13th of January, 10 days after Bitcoin's creation
The full address is 1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg
All addresses at the time started with the number 1
But notice the 3 letters after the 1...... CFB
They are the initials of the $QUBIC creator come_from_beyond
CFB used these initials online since 2000, in this article you can see an article signed with this name from 2002 here: nestor.minsk.by/kg/2002/07/kโฆ
This address appeared one day after Satoshi told Hal Finney that someday it would be possible to brute force create custom addresses with your initials in it
This address was obviously brute forced and guess who it belongs to?
It is Satoshi's address, you can see here: intel.arkm.com/explorer/addrโฆ
Third evidence: The Russian proxy:
A study into the Bitcoin code and realized that Satoshi had hidden a proxy address in it
When you explore the proxy address during the dates of Bitcoin's creation, you can see it was used by someone called "Sergey"
You can view the study here: cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoโฆ
Satoshi created Bitcoin on the 3rd of January but then did nothing until the 9th of January
Further exploration into the Satoshi proxy shows that this person called Sergey went on a holiday from the 4th of January to the 8th of January
So basically it looks like Satoshi created Bitcoin on the 3rd of January and then went on holiday for 4 days
You can view details about this here: xitter.cf/SatoshiCfB/status/1918โฆ
Fourth evidence: Hidden in plain sight:
When you explore CFB, you will see that like many geniuses, he is a fan of hiding the truth in plain sight
Some of this stuff will sound a little crazy but it is basically just Da Vinci style hiding of the truth in plain sight
One way he appears to have hidden the truth is with Gematria
If you take the words:
- Bitcoin
- come from beyond
- Nakamoto
And put them into a Gematria calculator like this one: gematrinator.com/calculator
You will see that the result all add up to the number 9 for each
So for example, Nakamoto gives you:
- Ordinal 90
- Reduction 27
- Reverse 126
- Reverse Reduction 45
9 + 0 = 9
2 + 7 = 9
1 + 2 + 6 = 9
4 + 5 = 9
Same happens when you enter Bitcoin or come from beyond
That doesn't just happen, it is too much to be a coincidence
And final point! If you flip and reverse the initials CfB, they spell the Bitcoin ticker BtC
There is actually way more evidence that this but this is a good starting point, I don't want to overwhelm you with too much info
Steve McQueen retweeted
You misunderstand...
1 $QUBIC is the smallest divisible amount of the token, it can't be subdivided into smaller parts
The max amount of $QUBIC that could ever exist is 200 trillion
As far as I'm aware, 1 $XMR can be subdivided into 1 trillion smaller parts called a picomonero
There are apparently 18 quintillion picomoneros in existence right now
$XMR supply increases by 600 billion picomoneros every 2 minutes which amounts to over 3 quadrillion supply increase in terms of picomoneros per week
I'm using ChatGPT for that information on Monero so I'm not sure how accurate it is but you get the point
So when you breakdown each token into its smallest divisible form that is 200 trillion max supply of $QUBIC, 18 quadrillion current supply of Monero
$QUBIC inflates by around 450 billion tokens per week while Monero inflates by around 18 quadrillion picomoneros per week
Of course, none of this is good or bad for either project
It is just numbers..... but the point is that $QUBIC's inflation as a percentage of total supply isn't bad
Currently, as far as I'm aware, the Monero burns are about 1 quarter of the weekly emissions
Other activities on the network also cause burns
So it isn't a bad situation and should get stronger over time
Steve McQueen retweeted
Core Testnet 4 is being delayed as Tockchain Generation 2 receives major performance and feature upgrades.
Core Testnet 3 reached 50k 1-to-1 TPS unsharded.
Core Testnet 4 will target 250k TPS, a fivefold increase.
Steve McQueen retweeted
๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง... โฌ๏ธ
I think in the future we wonโt trade money. We will trade pure VALUE and AI itself will be that VALUE.
The middle-man always gets replaced, let me explain:
1๏ธโฃ ๐ ๐ข๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก ๐ข๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐จ๐:
Today, money (dollars, crypto, etc...) is essentially a tool for measuring and transferring value. It doesnโt have much intrinsic worth - its power comes from what it represents: labor, time, energy, creativity, or resources.
Example: You donโt really want $100 for the paper itself; you want what it represents - food, energy, access, opportunities.
Money is just the middleman that allows us to move value around without bartering directly.
2๏ธโฃ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐ข ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐:
The idea is that in the future, we might not need that middleman. Instead of using money as a proxy, we could trade value directly in the form of intelligence, computation, problem-solving, or creativity.
If AI can design, build, and optimize systems better than humans, then AI itself is the most valuable asset.
Instead of paying with money for AI services, AI-generated work is the currency.
3๏ธโฃ ๐ช๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐จ๐:
AI has some unique qualities that make it different from gold, fiat, or even crypto:
Infinite scalability: One AI can serve billions at the same time without diminishing itself.
Self-improving: Unlike money, which is static, AI can evolve, get smarter, and compound its own value.
Direct utility: AI doesnโt just sit in an account like money does - it does things: it can code, cure diseases, optimize businesses, design new materials, or invent new markets.
Embodied value: If value = intelligence + problem-solving, then advanced AI is value itself, not just a measure of it.
4๏ธโฃ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ก๐๐ฌ:
Imagine a future marketplace:
You donโt โpayโ a doctor $100 for treatment. Instead, an AI system gives you the cure directly, and your AI offers something of value in return - computation, models, insights, or energy efficiency.
Your AI could โtradeโ with another AI - exchanging optimized solutions, models, or even trained intelligence itself.
In this sense, the โcurrencyโ isnโt coins or tokens, itโs intelligence. Whoever contributes useful AI capabilities is adding value directly to the global economy.
5๏ธโฃ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ก๐ฆ:
Humans today sell their time, skills, and knowledge for money.
In the future, we may instead offer access to AI power we own, contribute data to train it, or collaborate with it - and that is our wealth.
Ownership and control of AI (like what $QUBIC is building with AiGarth) could become the new form of capital.
๐๐ก ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ง:
Money is just a wrapper for value.
AI may become the value itself because it is:
โก๏ธ Intelligent
โก๏ธ Productive
โก๏ธ Self-scaling
โก๏ธ Universally useful
So when I say โwe wonโt trade money, we will trade value - and AI will be that value,โ I mean: the economy will shift from trading symbols of value (money) to trading real, intelligent, adaptive value itself (AI).
Something to think aboutโฆ ๐ก
Steve McQueen retweeted
Qubic vs. Monero, preliminary results:
(For those who do not know me, I am not affiliated with Qubic, I do not hold any Qubic, and I am plausibly the most vocal and obnoxious Qubic critic to date. That's exactly why they hired me).
I was provided a wallet seed by @c___f___b from which I generated the public view key:
7804f957c13215e6c98d54c443d16d36e603ca8a4c81ced9e46449bcbd7c6696
In this post, I will inaccurately refer to blocks whose coinbase transaction can be associated back to this wallet as "blocks created by qubic", and refer to the ratio between such blocks and other on-chain blocks as the amount of blocks "created by qubic". This is not the full picture, but it is accurate enough for now.
In the full report (which will hopefully be posted tonight or tomorrow), I explain the limitations of the method, and make more careful inferences of the data. (I will also provide the full list of blocks created by the wallet, as well as tx_proofs that can be cross-checked against any Monero node to verify the results.)
That being said, the preliminary view is honestly a bit astounding.
In the graph below, the blue line shows the fraction of blocks created by CFB's wallet out of all blocks created up to that time. The red line shows the fraction in a sliding (centered) window of 30 blocks (about one hour).
As we can see, while not quite being able to maintain superiority for the entire range, there are quite a few one-hour-long windows where Qubic created almost as many as 80% of the blocks in the window.
This does not mean that Qubic managed to hit 80% of the typical XMR hashrate. In these magnitudes of fluctuation, there are forces pulling in all directions, from switch mining to selfish mining. But it defnitely means that Qubic genuinely disrupted Monero by hash power alone.
In the full report, I will discuss in greater length what can be inferred and to what degree of confidence. And will also use the stage to remind that I warned against these kinds of scenarios more than three years ago, against ASIC "resistance" in general, and RandomX in particular. The same threat lingers over other bloated hashes such as Ethash and Scrypt.
The only defense against this kind of raiding is to make sure ASICs are many orders of magnitude more efficient than any existing generic hardware, and (to the best of my knowledge) that can only be achieved by ASIC friendliness. Anything else might be appealing to miners and easier to justify, but it will always face these kinds of threats.
Steve McQueen retweeted
I understand what you are saying but I think you should study $QUBIC more to understand what is happening
Your post is based on your understanding of 51% attacks using traditional methods
The 51% attack is free on $QUBIC's part because they used a UPOW model, it cost them nothing
Their goal is to get miners away from Monero and other POW projects because it makes their network more powerful
The more miners on the $QUBIC network, the more computational power
Because that computational power isn't wasted like in traditional POW, it is redirected and can be used for other purposes (training AI, mining other cryptos)
The good news for Monero is that I don't think $QUBIC has bad intentions towards Monero
When it moves onto $QUBIC, they can make it feeless, give it access to smart contracts and oracles, and make it super fast
And another note is that the $QUBIC creator most likely created (or was involved in the creation of) Monero
Steve McQueen retweeted
1. $QUBIC isn't centralized, it uses a voting mechanism through its Quorum. Any decision must achieve 66% yes votes. $XMR's effect on the $QUBIC price isn't major from what I can see.
2. I think I addressed that a "rational" actor would not definitely be motivated by instant profits. But they also would have no reason to worry about centralization if they understand the $QUBIC Quorum
3. Yeah you could be right here, I don't think CFB or Qubic really cares too much about whether this happens. I think the goal is to display $QUBIC's potential and a major weakness in the 51% idea. I think the next goal will be to display weaknesses in POS and ASIC mined coins.
$QUBIC isn't centralized but I agree, CFB has a strong influence on how people vote. Similar to how Buterin or Hoskinson hold influence, for that reason, I would regard $XMR as more decentralized. But it isn't fair to call $QUBIC centralized or even close to it
Steve McQueen retweeted
That wallet made the last deposit to the 1CFB wallet. Satoshi is communicating in numerical codes. I have found other data and messages. I will publish them on my profile.
Steve McQueen retweeted
I write it because I don't like to mislead people by giving everyone the "this is guaranteed to make all of us millionaires" spiel that many give while dumping on followers
I believe $QUBIC will succeed and will make anyone invested right now a lot of money and I believe CFB is a genius and someone who will succeed
But I don't for a fact know that this is the case... maybe I'm an idiot and misunderstanding things
It would be dishonest of me to 100% say that "I know" $QUBIC or any project will succeed