Blokes who vote progressive need to watch this clip carefully. A One Nation senator asks a simple question: Why is there an Office for Women with real power and funding, but nothing equivalent for men? The answer from the government side is basically: “We have a men’s health envoy… think of our daughters… this isn’t a zero-sum game.” But look at the outcomes: Men are the majority of suicides. Men make up most workplace deaths. Boys are now the minority starting university. Fathers are far more likely to lose primary care of their kids after separation. If you believe in fairness and evidence, those numbers matter. An Office for Women is fine. Supporting women is fine. But refusing the same institutional recognition for the serious, measurable problems men and boys face is not equality. It’s selective equality. When you vote for parties that defend this imbalance, you are voting for a system that treats male disadvantage as less important. That includes your rights as a father, your son’s education, and the support available when men are in crisis. You can still care about women’s issues. You can still reject the extremes. But don’t pretend voting for this approach is voting for equal treatment. The record shows otherwise. Equality means looking at the data on both sides. Not just the side that fits the preferred narrative.