Western women tend to advocate for mass third world migration and kindness. Here are some exceptions.
#MadeArdernGoAway
Top-left: Marine Le Pen, leader of the National Rally party in France.
Top-right: Katie Hopkins, British media personality and political commentator.
Bottom-left: Alice Weidel, co-leader of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.
Bottom-right: Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Dutch conservative political influencer and commentator
You get what you deserve.
That stunned French lady .. she's a member of the French left-wing party and an activist, one of the biggest advocates for opening up migration to North African peoples, and she defends them every time they cause a disaster or catastrophe, accusing others who want to stop the flood of these savages of racism ...
She owns a small chic boutique in an upscale spot, she stood in her shop trying to save it from looting and theft, and because she's a famous activist
she tells them I'm so-and-so, the activist for asylum, I'm with you, I've defended you and your entry and stay in France, they spat on her, knocked her down, and trampled her with their feet, good thing she's still alive
And they looted the whole shop, the lady ended up on the iron bars, losing all the struggle and work of her lifetime in a moment ..
Standing there stunned, not believing that these thieving, rabble-rousing, criminal, barbaric hordes are the ones she's spent her whole life defending, and advocating for them to invade her country and destroy it
Because of her fame in defending North African refugees, all the French media yesterday was carrying her story and her picture in front of her looted shop, poor thing, her whole life wasted and she can't believe the extent of her stupidity that brought France to this ruin and destruction
#BelieveAllWomen
A former MIT scientist whose career was derailed following se*ual misconduct allegations has won a $6 million defamation lawsuit against the colleague who accused him.
A Suffolk County jury in Massachusetts sided with prominent biologist Dr. David Sabatini on Friday, finding that his former colleague, Dr. Kristin Knouse, defamed him and interfered with his professional relationships.
The verdict comes roughly five years after allegations against Sabatini led to his departure from the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and eventually MIT.
Sabatini and Knouse began a relationship in 2018 while both were associated with Whitehead. Knouse later alleged that the relationship was coercive and that Sabatini, who held a position of professional influence, had fostered a hostile and sexualized environment in his laboratory.
Sabatini maintained throughout the dispute that their relationship was consensual.
In 2021, an internal investigation commissioned by Whitehead concluded that Sabatini had violated workplace policies, including policies concerning sexual harassment and relationships in the workplace. He subsequently left Whitehead, and his position at MIT also came to an end.
Sabatini later sued Knouse, arguing that her allegations had destroyed his reputation and severely damaged a scientific career that had once made him one of the most prominent researchers in his field.
The fallout extended beyond MIT. In 2022, Sabatini was being considered for a position at New York University, but students and faculty protested the possibility of his appointment. He ultimately was not hired.
After hearing the evidence in the years-long legal battle, the Massachusetts jury found in Sabatini's favor on his defamation and interference claims and awarded him $6 million in damages, plus interest. The jury also rejected Knouse's counterclaims.
No. 8 NEWS ZONE (formerly known as MAGA Mike) retweeted
Don Brash
We are now just nineteen days away from the election, with advance voting opening next Monday.
Yes, that's only seven days away.
Issues of fairness, equal rights, and one law for all are right at the core of this election—the very principles Hobson’s Pledge was founded to protect.
Chip in now to amplify Hobson's Pledge's message in the next crucial 7 days.
Labour’s Agenda and the Left
In a recent Q+A interview, Labour leader Chris Hipkins revealed two deeply concerning priorities:
School Governance: Labour plans to reinstate the legal requirement for school boards to "give effect" to the Treaty of Waitangi. Instead of focusing on reading, writing, maths, and achievement for every child regardless of background, Labour seems intent on pushing political propaganda in our classrooms.
Separatism over Equality: The Treaty is increasingly used as a stalking horse for radical left-wing agendas. Rather than ensuring equality of opportunity, Labour seeks to filter everything through a race-based lens and try to impose equality of outcome.
Mr Hipkins was recently on Te Ao with Moana about the radical Matike Mai report. This is a report sponsored by the Iwi Chairs Forum and effectively is calling for separate governance between Māori and all other New Zealanders.
When asked about the report, Mr Hipkins admitted he didn't agree with all of it. He owes New Zealanders a clear explanation of exactly which parts he does agree with! Similarly, regarding He Puapua, he claimed much of it is happening, just "not under the auspices of He Puapua."
Gangs, Radical Parties, and Māori Seats
Meanwhile, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori have been openly aligning with gangs—celebrating groups whose actions cause immense harm, particularly within Māori communities.
In just-released footage, Te Pāti Māori MP, Oriini Kaipara, was heard telling her Mongrel Mob audience that they are proud descendants of Maui, Kupe, and Tupaia and consequently should be given houses and support. That’s right, a Te Pāti Māori MP telling criminals that every other New Zealand taxpayer should be funding them simply because of their ancestry.
Add to this, Te Pāti Māori candidate Aperahama Edwards recently said the quiet bit out loud when on a marae: "Our Te Tiriti entrenchment policy is a bottom line; it's non-negotiable." Neither the Greens nor Te Pāti Māori appears committed to core issues like law and order, justice, health, or basic education.
The future of Māori seats remains one of the most divisive issues in New Zealand politics today. While radical parties demand their entrenchment, Hobson’s Pledge believes in a simple, fundamental principle: equal citizenship under one law, with every vote carrying equal weight.
Public opinion is firmly on the side of democratic equality. In the Curia Market Research Māori Seats Poll (March 2026) commissioned by Hobson's Pledge, New Zealanders were asked directly whether Parliament should hold a public referendum—open to all adult citizens—on whether to continue with separate Māori seats:
44% support a nationwide referendum
32% oppose holding a referendum
24% remain unsure
By a significant 12-point margin, more New Zealanders support putting this decision directly to the public than opposing it.
Political parties must state their position clearly before votes are cast.
Common Sense in Water Regulation
On a positive note, it is encouraging to see ACT commit to removing te mana o te wai from national water standards.
Introducing unmeasurable, untestable "spiritual" tests for every farmer and water user is not only unprincipled madness—it is economically unworkable.
With advance voting starting in just seven days, now is the time to demand clarity and equal citizenship from every candidate seeking your vote.
Yours sincerely,
📷
Don Brash
Trustee of Hobson's Pledge
The good guys support free speech, Labour, not so much.
They want to set up a new government watchdog for the internet, with the power to investigate, enforce and fine legal speech.
Facebook, YouTube, X: every platform you use would be legally required to “protect Kiwis from harmful content”.
This isn’t an under-16 ban. It covers every adult in the country and every post you make.
The police can only act when you break the law. Labour’s internet police won’t need you to break any law at all.
Maybe stop handing out citizenships and start charging an annual fee to stay in NZ as a non citizen.























