The_Peshwa retweeted
Goddess Durga Slaying the Demon Mahishasura, Odisha, India, 13th century AD.
Currently in the British Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Replugging this thread. xitter.cf/tpeshwa/status/1789852…
Look at the wrestling match going on in the middle. Ancient Indian/Early Medieval wrestling did allow strikes and was similar to the Greek Pankration. The modern form that does not allow strikes always existed as well, but only grew to prominence during the Mughal Era
Pressing him with your legs, you manage an elephant.
Your fine ankles seem smooth, the leg rings worn flat.
Your bow is so beautiful that it dazzles the eyes as it rests in your hand curved to draw and release your arrows in battle.
Your chest is so broad the goddess Sri forsakes
all others for it!
You have the strength to drive back elephants!
And whether it is night or day matters nothing to your desire
for plunder and the sound of weeping, as your enemies scream
for their kin in the light of their blazing cities!
O Valavan
riding your elegant chariot! In the countries of your enemies, nothing of value remains throughout the vast spaces where there were cities
always shining with such fresh wealth they disdained earth
and used fish to block holes in dams where the cool water poured
through, roaring!
Purananuru-7
That women of the past, especially royal women, had some idea of the use of weapons isn’t really up for debate. We have bardic accounts and paintings showing royal women were capable of wielding them…especially while engaging in Shikar. It would also help when it came to self defense from raiders. However this doesn’t mean that women engaged in warfare. There were a few exceptions, but that wasn’t the rule. Now in the Ramayana, Sita does not wield weapons. She does not slay demons when Khara attacks them. Rama has his glorious aristeia when he stands alone and slays Khara and his host. The movie should stay true to the text.
That Kshatriya women were trained in swordplay isn't far from reality of that era? We did have warrior princesses and queens etc. That much is real.
But showing Sita Ma do it on screen is definitely feminism influence. I am no Ramayana expert. Don't know if this Sita warrior antics are documented in Valmiki or any other variations. May be makers took Amish Tripathi's - 'Sita: Warrior of Mithila' too seriously?
Should get rid of reservations and make this exam 1 attempt.
Southern Indians also join the army at comparable rates as Northern Indians, except for border states. There really is no love lost between Southern India and Pakistan
The_Peshwa retweeted
RAGAMALA SERIES: A man mounting a horse held by a groom is identified as SINDHU RAGAPUTRA OF SRI RAGA BILASPUR, NORTH INDIA, CIRCA 1750 Claudio Moscatelli Collection, London. @Kautilya02 @DalrympleWill @PunjabiRooh @ssharadmohhan @IndiaArtHistory
The_Peshwa retweeted
🇲🇽⚔️🇪🇸Hernan Cortez Leads the charge to Victory at the Battle of Otumba in 1520
This battle is an incredible story of victory against all odds-👇🏻
The Spanish & Tlaxcalan forces numbering only around 2500-3000 total, including refugees and women and children, with only around 500 Spanish infantry, 20 armored cavalryman including Cortez, and 12 crossbowman, defeated the massive Aztec army which was claimed to be 100,000 strong. (Though this is probably an exaggeration).
I want to also add that the Spanish had NO firearms or cannon whatsoever at this battle, contrary to popular media who puts emphasis on this point as to why such small forces repeatedly defeat the Aztecs. Their armor, steel weapons, horses, and fighting spirit won the day.
Cortez and his men were in flight from Tenochtitlan after having barely escaped by fighting their way out; the Aztec forces then pursued he and his men, looking to wipe out their small force and his Tlaxcalan allies.
All seemed lost for the Conquistadors, who made their stand on the plains of Temelcatitlan near Otumba.
Exhausted and outnumbered, the Spanish and Allies Tlaxcalans made their stand.
Defeat here would spell total annihilation of the Spanish in the New World, and would have changed the course of history. But it was not to be.
He formed his armored infantry into a circle as they were completely surrounded, with missile troops and Tlaxcalans in the center; a mobile fortress.
The Aztec army could not penetrate the fortified shield & spear wall. There were many refugees/non combatants amongst the Coalition forces, and they all fought, including one Maria de Estrada, a Spanish woman who was described as (Quote) “fighting as if she were one of the bravest men in the world.”
Cortez knew he must do something drastic, and decided to lead a last ditch cavalry charge directly at the Aztec commander-Cortez knew that he could break the enemy if he were to kill & capture the standard of the Aztec commander, Matlatzincatzin.
Cortez led the charge along with his best remaining horsemen and hardened soldiers Gonzalo Dominguez, Cristobal de Olid, Gonzalo de Sandoval, and Juan de Salamanca…
The furious charge of the small group of Spaniards caught the Aztec commander off guard, and Juan de Salamanca drove the Aztec commander through with a lance, killing him and capturing the standard.
The resulting confusion and demoralization of the Aztec army after the death of their leader caused them to retreat in disorder and scatter. The coalition forces were then able to return to Tlaxcalan territory to rest, heal, & decide their next course of action.
Against all odds they had defeated the Aztec forces. This battle was the death blow to the Aztec Empire’s struggle against the Conquistadores.
Almost all of the Spaniards were wounded, with Cortez himself falling into a coma-he recovered, and within months the Spansh would build a navy and take Tenochtitlan once and for all.
Artwork by Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau.
Scottish clan system is often interpreted as classless democracy, this is not true and highland society was highly stratified.
The effects of Nalanda’s burning is one of the most overstated incidents in Indian history. The books of value that were burnt, probably had copies elsewhere and anyways, the majority of texts there would’ve been Buddhist polemics, not really anything of value
This is an image of a man hunting off horseback using a bow from the Gupta Empire. The technique was not an unknown technique for the cavalry class of the Gupta period. But just because the technique is known, that doesn’t mean the Guptas fielded large squadrons of horse archers, like a steppe style army. Indian Cavalry, outside of Rajasthan, primarily fought as light lancers or as javelin cavalry (think Numidians). This persists even after horse archery becomes commonplace in India during the Mughal era. The stereotypical Maratha cavalryman is a light lancer mounted on his pony. The stereotypical Rajpoot is a heavy cavalryman mounted on his Marwari (which is about the size of an Arab horse). Now I guess it is possible that the Guptas were able to develop corps of horse archers, but we don’t really know. At the very least, they might’ve been able to hire mercenaries to perform that function.
The Norman Knight would be considered a light cavalryman in the 15th century
The_Peshwa retweeted
🇮🇹🇦🇹⚔️Armor for Man & Horse for a Member of the Völs-Colonna Family of South Tyrol ca. 1575
The total combined weight of both the man's and horse's armor is 114 pounds.
The etched decoration of this armor is of a type that became fashionable in northern Italy during the late 1500s.
It consists of ornamental bands of etched figures, animals, portrait busts, and armor trophies. In addition, a coat of arms is represented seven times in different places—the center of the breastplate and blackplate, the front and back of each pauldron (shoulder defense), and the center of the peytral (horse's breastplate).
The coat of arms is that of the Colonna family quartered with another, still unidentified family.
It probably belonged to an unknown member of the Völs-Colonna family from the South Tyrol, now part of northern Italy.






































