Stan Brown retweeted
The entrenched, unelected, careerist bureaucracy in our federal government is so much worse than almost everyone realizes.
I wish more conservatives understood this, because then they might stop bitching about what the Trump Admin has been able to accomplish and not accomplish.
Given what they are up against, the accomplishments of the Trump Admin over the past almost two years have been nothing short of miraculous.
Stan Brown retweeted
Roger Pielke pulls back the covers on the "climate attribution" scam that says everything is caused by climate change.
He shows how using their bogus method, he can prove climate change caused an increase in baseball home runs …
Well done, that man!
w.
rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p…
Stan Brown retweeted
Gayle King’s astonishment that the holdout juror was a black man says a great deal more about her own prejudices than it does about the juror.
Clarence Thomas spoke about exactly this mindset during his confirmation hearings 35 years ago, i.e. the idea that a black man is expected to think a certain way, hold certain views, and arrive at certain conclusions. And when he doesn’t, a lot of people simply cannot compute it.
35 years later, here we are again. A black man thinks for himself, reaches his own conclusion, and the reaction is disbelief.
Stan Brown retweeted
Excess mortality during the pandemic was not from the virus but from “assaults” - all the things we did in response. The covid shot was a repeated cytotoxic assault. @denisrancourt @AllisonInquiry
Stan Brown retweeted
Mothers in Ceuta are GOING OFF on the rampant crime in the cities since Spain was INVADED by Muslims.
Her children can’t go to school.
She can’t walk the streets alone at night.
Families are not safe in their homes.
This is no way to live.
The leaders of Spain have betrayed their own people and allowed an invasion.
Now the people are rising up…
Stan Brown retweeted
Atlas, ARC 2026: "Intelligent people decided the moment of greatest crisis was precisely the wrong time to think and the wrong time to speak. The silence that followed the pandemic malfeasance is the real danger. Tocqueville warned the gravest threat to free societies is not the tyrant but the self-imposed suppression of unpopular truth."
Stan Brown retweeted
Remember: the EU’s economy was larger than the US’s in 2011. Thanks to its self-defeating ‘green’ and GDPR policies (and U.S. tech dominance) the US economy is now 44% larger than Europe’s. Europe needs to wake up. 🇺🇸 🇪🇺
Stan Brown retweeted
Atlas "I came with dozens of papers, up-to-date data; they never brought a single scientific paper in meetings I saw, never, not a single time... VP Pence asked me about risk to kids. I went through the data. He asked Fauci: no response. Birx said 'You're an outlier!'. That's not a scientific response. They tried to delegitimize me bc I disagreed, they didn't refute me with data -because they couldn't"
Stan Brown retweeted
TRUMP’S TRADE BOMB: Deficit CRASHES $100 BILLION
U.S. trade deficit just collapsed from $136B to $29.4B — lowest in nearly 20 years.
CNBC anchors left stunned, forced to admit Trump and Scott Bessent were right the whole time.
Reagan-level results. America First economics delivering.
The globalist free-trade scam just got exposed.
Share this. The media won’t.
#AmericaFirst #TrumpEconomy #TradeWarWin #MAGA
Stan Brown retweeted
I always understood why the Second Amendment was constitutionally protected.
What I never really understood was why people called it a natural right.
Then I moved from New York to Florida.
I didn’t own a gun yet.
One afternoon I was loading things into the trunk of my car outside a HomeGoods when a man approached me.
“Excuse me.”
He must have thought he’d startled me, because he immediately added, “Don’t worry. I’m not going to get close.”
I laughed.
“I’m a New Yorker. I’m used to close. How can I help you?”
He started telling me that he needed money for gas.
At some point while he was talking, I got into my car.
And sitting there, with the conversation still unfolding, I suddenly realized something:
He didn’t know whether I had a gun.
Not somewhere at home.
Not hypothetically.
For all he knew, I could have had one right there in the car, tucked under the steering wheel or within reach.
I didn’t.
But he couldn’t know that.
Schrödinger’s gun.
And in that instant, before I even knew whether his story was true, something changed in the space between us.
I thought about New York.
I thought about my friend who had been murdered in his own apartment during a burglary gone wrong.
Would those men have gone into his apartment if they had believed he might be armed?
I don’t know.
I thought about the time I was mugged at gunpoint, with a gun pressed against my temple.
Would that man have approached me with the same confidence if he had believed there was even a possibility that I could defend myself?
I don’t know that either.
But sitting there in that Florida parking lot, listening to this stranger talk, I suddenly understood deterrence in a way I never had before.
Not as military theory.
Not as constitutional law.
As something intimate.
My body. My life. The few feet between one person and another.
For years I had thought about guns primarily as objects: who had one, who shouldn’t have one, what laws should govern them.
Suddenly I understood the question from the other direction.
What changes when another person cannot simply assume that I am defenseless?
I felt taller.
Not because I had a gun.
I didn’t.
But because, for the first time, I understood that someone approaching me could not automatically assume that being physically stronger meant having power over me.
There was uncertainty.
There was a boundary around my body that had to be taken seriously.
Then his story began to fall apart.
I told him I didn’t have cash, but offered to help another way. I could put some gas in his car.
He took off.
So apparently, yes, it was a scam.
But by then I had already understood something much larger than the scam.
The phrase natural right finally made sense to me.
The Constitution had not given me ownership of my body.
It had not given me my life.
It had not invented my right to protect either one.
Those things came first.
What I understood that afternoon was the thing underneath them.
I had once been completely helpless while another human being held a gun against my temple.
Years later, without a gun in my possession at all, I understood what it meant for the person approaching me not to know whether I was helpless.
That uncertainty changed the space between us.
And that was the moment I finally understood the natural right behind the Second Amendment:
My life is mine, and
the right to defend it has to exist before anyone gives me permission to do so.
Stan Brown retweeted
“Debanking” is cancel culture on steroids. Your bank account should not come with a loyalty test. But they increasingly are.
We don’t want a world where religious organizations are denied access to financial services just because they supported pro-life causes, for example. We don’t want conservative groups looking over their shoulder because they hosted conservative speakers or registered young people to vote.
Churches and non-profit organizations play vital roles in every community. Yet some voices in Washington would rather cut off the charities, churches, and nonprofits that traditionally hold American communities together.
This is wrong – no matter which party is in power. Read this blog post about why politics and cancel culture should be kept out of banking!
bit.ly/4xQ7Tv5
Stan Brown retweeted
They love this argument: If you can’t distinguish between various factions of far-leftism, then you’re automatically disqualified from having an opinion.
Up front, here are the definitions (plus bonus Leninism definition):
Communists = Strive for a classless society with common ownership of production.
Marxists = Communists who believe in a classless society as the end of history.
Leninists = Those who idolize the man who operationalized Marxism to its logical conclusion.
Socialists = Fake meaning (Berniebros): Kids who like free stuff. Real meaning (PSL, DSA): Communists who pretend to tolerate dissent.
And now here’s the reason why they’re all interchangeable and why it’s perfectly OK for everyone to use any one of those terms to refer to the others:
They all advocate to overthrow the American government via revolution. Every single faction I’ve researched has had links to foreign hostile governments in service of revolution. Rubio’s Cuba Report from last week did a good job of documenting far left ties to Cuba. But what’s not covered is their deep ties to Venezuela, Nicaragua, Iran, China, and more.
Far-leftists are fundamentally subversive to the core, with allegiances to foreign hostile governments. All of them. That’s what makes them interchangeable. Not whether they decide their party platform via Comintern vs. parliament.
They’re “populist” only insofar as their allegiance is to some arbitrary Communist utopia rather than NATO. Which, by the way, is why I’m going to call out any right-wing commentator who proposes forming alliances with so-called “left-wing populists.”
State governments must take the lead in banning far-leftists from voting in local elections or holding statewide office.
Stan Brown retweeted
Half a million views for a malicious smear. Nathan Cofnas did not launch a witch hunt, nor did he “argue” this. He was quoting from a Harvard report. But truth is entirely beside the point for them. This is about destroying Nathan and sending a warning to everyone else. Challenge the DEI regime, or simply say aloud what everyone is expected to pretend not to see, and this is what they will do to you.
Nathan Cofnas, who launched the witch-hunt against Professor Jason Arday, wrote a blog post arguing that in meritocracy, Black people would largely be absent from prominent positions outside of sports and entertainment.
He claimed that, under such a system, Black people would “disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.”
Stan Brown retweeted
Today - Dr. Fauci's former senior advisor, David Morens, pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud the US.
Morens and others plotted to conceal/destroy federal records re: COVID-19 and federal grants to avoid FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
Stan Brown retweeted
Absolute 🐂💩.
This Congressman wants to tax unrealized capital gains, and when the tax is imposed on a founder of a VC-backed company and that founder has no liquidity to pay the tax, he or she must pledge his or her shares to the federal government to back the debt of an unpaid "wealth tax."
Guess what happens if that founder never gets liquidity? The government seizes control of the company.
This is a backdoor way to achieving Lenin's dream of seizing the means of production, and is as far removed from "free enterprise" as is possible.
Khanna is a dangerous Marxist operative whose actions speak vastly louder than his words.
Replying to @DutchRojas
I am a believer in free enterprise. I want it to work for the people I grew up with, not just for a few in a few places. Always open to dialogue!
Stan Brown retweeted
It has been ten years, and there is still no sign that the fake news will ever stop lying.
Today, for instance, the New York Times finally decided to tell its readers about OXFERD C0MMA, one of the most outrageous investigations in American history, in which the intelligence and law enforcement apparatus was turned against the sitting president of the United States himself on the basis of a thoroughly discredited political hoax.
Needless to say, they whitewashed the entire affair, somehow transforming it into a complaint that Trump was not investigated aggressively enough.
But its treatment of the name itself is perhaps the most revealing part.
OXFERD C0MMA was not simply a peculiar FBI code name. “Oxford” became “Oxferd,” while the “O” in “Comma” was replaced with a zero, alterations that made the investigation impossible to discover through searches, FOIA requests, etc. It took more than nine years for the public even to learn what we now know, and we would never have learned about it at all had President Trump not been reelected.
So ok, the FBI concealed the investigation in the name. Now watch how the New York Times conceals what the FBI did.
Here is the entirety of its explanation:
“It was oddly code-named Oxferd Comma.”
That’s it.
There is no explanation of what was supposedly “odd” about the name, neither any mention of how those deliberate misspellings frustrated discovery. And, most remarkably, they changed the zero in C0MMA back into the letter O, literally erasing one of the devices used to conceal the investigation while purporting to report on it.
Nine years of concealment is whitewashed by the New York Times as an amusing little spelling quirk. And then they move on.
Stan Brown retweeted
This is correct, and it all leads back to DEFUSE, which is the key to understanding Covid, yet most people outside Twitter have never even heard of it.
In 2018, Fauci grantees Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric, working with the Wuhan lab, which itself was a Fauci subgrantee, created a blueprint for engineering Covid-like viruses. This was happening in parallel with the coronavirus work Daszak and the Wuhan lab were already conducting under their NIH grant. They then submitted the DEFUSE proposal to the Pentagon, supposedly as a way of protecting American soldiers from dangerous coronavirus spillover.
The premise was as harebrained as it sounds. In substance, they were proposing to create dangerous coronaviruses so that they could protect people from dangerous coronaviruses. The Pentagon, wisely, rejected the proposal.
But there was an enormous problem. The Wuhan lab already had the blueprint because its own scientists had helped write it.
The whole idea that Americans would collaborate with a Chinese military-aligned lab on a proposal supposedly intended to protect the U.S. military is so outrageously stupid that it is difficult to believe it actually happened. But it did, and from that moment several obvious incentives and pathologies of the Chinese state came into play.
They would have had every reason to suspect that the Americans had not truly abandoned the project and might instead pursue it covertly. They might also have assumed that, even if the Pentagon had rejected it for the moment, it would be revived later. More importantly, the mere existence of the proposal would have signaled that the underlying research had military and strategic value, giving the Chinese an obvious incentive to pursue it independently. And because Wuhan researchers had already helped design the experiments, they possessed not merely the idea but much of the technical roadmap needed to carry it out.
And so the outcome was exactly what anyone with even a modicum of understanding of China should have anticipated from the outset. They went ahead with the work anyway, carrying it out under catastrophically inadequate biosafety conditions until the entirely foreseeable happened.
The COVID-19 origins story is not primarily a story about Anthony Fauci, but about China. Making this primarily about Dr. Fauci while giving China a pass isn’t just inconsistent with the available evidence, it also increases the risk of another, potentially even worse, pandemic emerging from China, where far too little has been done to address the systemic failures that sparked COVID-19.
I have been deeply investigating the origins of COVID-19 for 6½ years, and I can say with confidence that but for the unique pathologies of the Chinese state the COVID-19 pandemic would not have happened.




























