Christ is King. The Church is Israel, not the nation state of those who deny Him. Baptized Orthodox Christian. Christ and His Church before all else.
Joined August 2021
- Tweets9.3K
- Following636
- Followers485
- Likes115K
Pinned Tweet
Libertarians: "We believe in everyone being allowed their different opinions on things, just don't initiate violence."
Christians: "Pin-up calendars that are just wanking material for men isn't conservative and shouldn't be called such."
Libertarians: "SHUT UP, PRUDE!"
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
Dinesh has always been anti-White.
You guys were just so desperate to not be called racist that you ignored it.
Kicking my children out of the house and attracting talented kids from other homes has been a huge advantage for my household. They've increased my competitiveness with my neighbors. My lawn looks sharper, my bushes tidier, and my house brighter because of this!
Attracting talented people from India has been a huge American advantage. Turning them into targets of racial resentment is a sure way to squander it. A serious agenda for American competitiveness should recognize that.
theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/1…
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
MARTIN LUTHER AND THE PROBLEM WITH DECONSTRUCTIONISM
What happens when Christians begin dismantling the very traditions that formed their faith?
Martin Luther's break with the Roman Catholic Church in the 16th century reshaped Western Christianity and gave rise to the Protestant Reformation.
But the deeper question is this: Can Christianity survive when every generation feels entitled to reconstruct the faith according to its own interpretation?
🔴 1. THE PROBLEM WITH DECONSTRUCTION
Luther challenged established Catholic doctrines and authorities, emphasizing Scripture as the ultimate authority. While his reform movement addressed genuine disputes, the principle of rejecting inherited authority has contributed to ongoing fragmentation within Protestant Christianity.
🔴 2. THE FRAGMENTATION OF CHRISTIANITY
When private interpretation becomes the highest authority, competing interpretations multiply. Today, thousands of Protestant denominations and independent Christian communities disagree on fundamental doctrines. Christianity risks becoming shaped by individual preferences rather than a shared, historically rooted faith.
🔴 3. THE ORTHODOX ALTERNATIVE
Eastern Orthodoxy approaches the faith differently. Rather than treating Christianity as something each generation must reinvent, it emphasizes continuity with the apostolic faith through Holy Scripture, Sacred Tradition, the Ecumenical Councils, the Church Fathers, and sacramental life.
The goal isn't to deconstruct Christianity to fit modern sensibilities. It's to preserve the faith handed down through the generations.
📖 “Stand fast and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word or our epistle.” — 2 Thessalonians 2:15
Want to understand Christianity beyond modern ideological distortions?
🎓 Join Logos Academy and deepen your understanding of Scripture, Church history, Orthodox theology, and the intellectual foundations of the Christian faith.
#Orthodoxy #MartinLuther #ProtestantReformation #Christianity #LogosAcademy
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
I've been watching the exchange w/ Catholic priest Fr. Rooney and Erick Ybarra on the atonement this last week. You can see a large part of it in the quote-tweet. Erick promotes PSA as part of Catholic teaching and has written a whole book on the matter. Fr. Rooney denies this and does of fine job of showing that Catholicism doesn't teach PSA.
Fr. Rooney's points in many respects are the same points I and others have made with respect to PSA and the difference between PSA and Vicarious Satisfaction. He makes clear the differences between the Protestant view of PSA and the Catholic view of Vicarious Satisfaction not least of which is noting the entailment of a Protestant view of justification by the former.
The exchange is useful for those on the Orthodox side of the fence who are confused by the promoters of PSA within an Orthodox framework and their spoof texting. Rooney rightly notes the ways in which it is anachronistic to read terms like debt, punishment, etc. in pre-Reformation texts in PSA terms, just as I and others have done, as well as pointing out the actual conceptual differences between PSA and Vicarious Satisfaction. That language can be and is used by non-PSA views. Hence pointing to that language doesn't of itself prove a given figure expressed PSA.
As an added bonus, here we can be sure that Fr. Rooney did not derive his views from a study of Romanides or other figures but rather from a study of Catholic theology. And I'd bet money that Fr. Rooney or other Catholic academics know Catholic theology far better than any of the Latinizer crowd.
But we are treated to other bonuses here as well. For some time I have had Erick Ybarra blocked. And the main reason I did so is because Erick is a time sucker. I don't write that with respect to his character, but with respect to his method and behavior. I have gone rounds with Erick in the past to establish a point, with a concession on his part, only to have him relitigate the point all over again with the same reasoning a few hours or days later.
When Erick came out with his book defending the Protestant doctrine of PSA I knew a few things. I knew it was going to be a muddled mess. It is not that Erick is stupid, but he really lacks the education in this and related areas. The book defending PSA is just proof of it.
I also knew that as soon as the book caught the attention of Catholic academics it would spell doom for Mr. Ybarra. They would pick it apart and that is what Fr. Rooney has begun doing, along with other Catholics.
Another bonus is that Ericks fundamentally Protestant assumptions and frameworks for thinking about such issues would be laid bare. You can see this in the remark I have snipped below. Here the Protestant bifurcation between the justice of Christ, glossed as necessarily extrinsic, and the intrinsic state of the agent is pretty clear. Such a framework precludes a participatory relation that Catholic (and Orthodox) theology require.
But the icing on the cake is the fact that Erick has written a whole book on a core area of Catholic theology and he has gotten the matter seriously wrong. So much so that Catholic theologians have had to step in to correct him publicly. What is more, Erick doesn't appear to grasp that he is in serious trouble both in terms of understanding as well as credibility as an apologist. He also doesn't seem to understand that it would be better for him to steer clear from discussions with academics like Fr. Rooney than to attempt to correct them and be outed for his clear error, inability to grasp the operative concepts, and represent Catholic theology. This howler of a mistake in turn undermines all of his other books as well. If he got the atonement this seriously wrong in Catholic theology, what about his book on the Trinity?
But it appears that the desire to be a somebody in the realm of on-line apologetics is too great and here you can see Mr. Ybarra attempt to double down in the exchange with Rooney. Eventually it seems that he figured out that he was outmatched by Fr. Rooney and just goes dark. But it is too late and the damage is done.
What is worse is the fact that Fr. Rooney is unmarried. He has no children. Currently, Rooney is in the prime of his academic career. He is young, accomplished and is cranking out articles and books published by major academic presses like clockwork. This is what he does. This is all he does, 24/7. I exaggerate but not by much. All Erick has done is provide Fr. Rooney with the motivation for another book project to correct the errors of Erick and others on the atonement. And the more Erick promotes his book, the greater that motivation will be. It is pretty obvious that Erick is engaged in a business model that requires him to engage others to promote his book. He is as the kids say "locked in" and not in a good way.
The best part is that accomplishing this goal didn't require any work on my part. I didn't have to do anything to refute Erick or take away his credibility. I just had to sit and wait. After all, never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. This has the added benefit of showing that all the Latinizers who thought PSA was part of pre-Reformation Catholic (and Orthodox) teaching were not only wrong, but lack the ability to not only comprehend what they are reading but how to contextualize a text. But sure, they too can try their hand with Rooney or other Catholic theologians on this point, and please by all means do so. One thing is for sure. I am going to need to make a Costco run for more popcorn.
Himself. White really loves himself. Everyone else? If they don't bow before his incredible intellect and his amazing wisdom, then they're immature children who need to tell him what church they attend.
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
“Don't feel bad if people remember you only when they need you. Feel privileged that you are like a candle that comes to their mind when there is darkness."
St. Nikolai Velimirovic
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
Funny how Vance absolutely folded over being pressured about a “childless cat lady” joke, but suddenly finds a set of balls and a backbone when it comes time to defend a subcontinental promoting child abuse.
JD puts India first. Fuck him. He has to go.
VP JD Vance apologized for disparagingly calling some Democrats “childless cat ladies” in his latest book, calling the remark “boneheaded” and the “dumbest thing” he’s ever said.
Follow: @AFpost
These people have legit things they can attack Acton with. But somehow, they choose to use an incident of her being an ACTUAL VICTIM as a KID to attack her. And then handwave the disgust normal Americans have to such an ad. These people are vile. Never Vivek. Never Vance.
Hard facts.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Court records confirm Amy Acton's stepfather was arrested and indicted in 1978 for raping her at age 12; he fled before trial. Contemporary reports and her brother's statements corroborate her account of the abuse and estrangement.
factcheck.org/2026/10/contro…
politifact.com/article/2026/o…
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
JD Vance named his firstborn son “Vivek” after his Yale law school classmate Vivek Ramaswamy.
In 2025 Vance sent his political advisors to run Vivek’s campaign and political PAC.
Now Vance is defending Vivek’s attack ad against Amy Acton while he stumps for him in Ohio.
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
Because the Boomer Holy War, otherwise known as the Second World War, is the creation myth, the biblical Genesis, of the political world order we inhabit. History begins in 1945, Year Zero, when the Allied and Axis powers, the cosmic forces of absolute Good and Evil, clashed for dominion over the world.
What we call “Western Values” are the liberal American values of the postwar order: unregulated global capitalism, liberal democracy, individualism, civil rights, and equality. Three generations of men have been indoctrinated into this cult, which is ultimately a secularized heresy of Aristotelian humanist Christianity, repackaged as a universal moral doctrine.
Hitler has assumed the role of Satan, while some grotesque amalgamation of Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King Jr. occupies the throne of Jesus Christ. The Nazis are the defeated legions of Hell, and the Holocaust is the ultimate revelation of Evil against which all subsequent political and moral questions must be judged.
You’re not allowed to have nice things like community, traditional families, immigration restrictions, or any meaningful sense of national, ethnic, racial, or religious identity as a White person because any deviation from the sacred doctrines of the postwar consensus threatens to bring about Holocaust 2. To believe in any of these is to practice heresy. Racism is the ultimate heresy, and White guilt is origin sin, without a path to atonement.
The further removed each generation becomes from 1945, the weaker its attachment to this haphazard, pseudo religious worldview grows. In 13 years, an entire century will have passed since the outbreak of the Second World War.
The moralizing about the Holocaust, the obsessive fixation on stopping identity politics among native Westerners, the relentless insistence on feminism, diversity, and the ideological apparatus of the postwar order will resemble the exhausted dogmas of a dying secular religion whose founding revelation has lost its power over the living.
This is obvious as the materialistic promise of infinite growth and wealth has failed, and mass immigration, diversity and the third world are an existential threat to westerners who have no socioeconomic opportunities and a poor shot at family for formation.
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
/1 In his debate with @Craig_Truglia, @HwsEleutheroi cited the 794 Council of Frankfurt as if it claimed that Nicaea 2 failed to "remain content with the teachings of the ancient fathers".
This is not a statement attributable to Frankfurt.
A Thread 🧵
They're already trying to run cover for what James VERY PLAINLY said. Craig even gave him an opening to correct/clarify himself and James chose NOT to do so. These people don't have the facts on their side, so they rely on telling you not to believe your lying eyes (or ears).
The Protestant Revolution was highly influenced by Jews from the beginning. (It's Judaized to the core simply from its revolutionary spirit). Protestantism isn't going to save America or the West. It is the very poison that has brought us to this point.
Without post-70 AD, rabbinic Judaism, the Protestant church does not have a Bible.
First, the manuscript tradition that all of our modern translations are based on is the Masoretic text. The Masoretes were the rabbis that followed after the Tannaim and the Amoraim. They worked from the 7th to the 10thcentury AD and their main focus was the preserving of the Hebrew text of the Old Testament and developing the vowel and accent system that we use today when we read the Hebrew text. Delete the work of the Masoretes and you delete the text that we use for our Old Testament. No rabbis, no Bible.
Second, the Protestant recovery of the ability to read the Old Testament in the original Hebrew language was made possible by relying on the work of late medieval rabbis, primarily the grammarians, along with the assistance of 16thcentury Jews who either were willing to teach Hebrew to their Christian neighbors or who actually converted to the Christian faith themselves and brought their rabbinic knowledge of the Hebrew text with them. For instance, in the early thirteenth century, David Kimhi composed the Miklohl, a basic grammar of the Hebrew language, and the Hashorashim, a Hebrew dictionary. When sixteenth century Christians began returning to the Hebrew language, these texts provided their entrance into Hebrew fluency.
Additionally, the grammarians produced a series of commentaries on the text of the Old Testament, commentaries which developed something very similar to what we now refer to as the historical-grammatical method. These commentaries served as tutors to early protestant exegetes, trying to make their way through the Hebrew text for the first time. For instance, from 1517-1519, the Christian publisher Daniel Bomberg, working in Venice, published what we now refer to as the Bomberg Rabbinic Bible. It contained the Masoretic text of the Old Testament, surrounded by the corresponding Targum (Aramaic translation/interpretation of the Hebrew text), and commentaries by grammarians such as Rashi, Kimhi, Ibn Ezra, etc.
Bomberg’s Rabbinic Bible became an essential tool in the libraries of Reformed exegetes. If you have spent any time in Bucer’s commentary on the Psalms, you know how heavily he relied on Bomberg’s sources for his own understanding of the text. What is harder to notice, but which is equally true, is how much weight Calvin himself gave to these sources. At one point Calvin singles out Kimhi as the best of the Jewish exegetes. This reliance on the assistance of the grammarians permeates the works of sixteenth and seventeenth century, Protestant exegesis. Delete the Rabbis, and you delete the Protestant ability to read and translate the Hebrew text.
This reliance on Jewish sources was not without its pitfalls. The anti-trinitarian controversies that plagued the Reformed church in the 16th century were largely a result of Protestant reliance on Jewish commentaries. For instance, Kimhi’s commentary on the Psalms included critiques of the Christian reading of the messianic Psalms. Some young exegetes were not ready to go up against Kimhi’s work and found themselves succumbing to heterodox views on the deity of Christ, etc.
Nevertheless, the vast majority of the Reformed church figured out how to make good use of Jewish sources without losing their minds. For instance, it is not a coincidence that many of the contributors to the formation of the Reformed political tradition, men like Franciscus Junius and John Selden, were also great Hebraists, steeped deeply in the works of medieval rabbis. They drew from that tradition for much of their work. There were movements to burn all the Jewish sources that rose up at various moments, but these movements were primarily driven by the Papists, not the Reformed, who generally opposed this mania.
To repeat my opening claim - without post-70 AD, rabbinic Judaism, the Protestant church does not have a Bible. The Jews were still wrong about Jesus. But without them, you don’t have Bible.
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
Being highly educated in fraud and theft, Indians inherited their country from Britain and destroyed it in a decade. Such people can’t build or inherit a country so they’re invading ours.
Excluding someone from American society!?! THE HORROR! Don’t you know every single human has a divine, God given right to come to the US?
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
“We must oppose identity politics” he demanded during his latest meeting of the American Hindu-Jewish Congress at Mar-a-Lago
Conservatives who pretend to be against identity politics only really care about them when they think white people are catching on
You never see them passionately crusading against the dozens of explicitly ethnic lobbies that exist inside the GOP, they’re simply defending the status quo where the Republicans pander to organized minorities while crapping all over their most loyal voters
This is what they call “colorblindness”
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
Jeremy Boreing who would never post something like this defending against the systematic elimination of White people in Europe and North America, is trying to position himself as the new James Lindsay--competing with perpetual retard Joel Berry for the role.
Antisemitism isn’t just racism toward Jews. It isn’t “go back to where you came from” ethnonationalism. It’s “you came from nowhere, and you belong nowhere.”
We must recognize the goal of the project for what it is. It’s not America First, not “just noticing” or “just asking questions.”
The goal of the antisemitic project is to eradicate the Jews.
youtube.com/watch?v=gmsc6lUi…
SpecOpsElite ☦️ retweeted
Over the last few days, we’ve learned from the right hand of Progressivism that because women and minorities have already politically organized themselves around an inherited identity, we have to run TV ads with White men as the stand in for everything bad in society because otherwise it would draw the ire of these groups who are already engaged in identity politics.
Why do these groups get a golden veto over everything the Right does, but the most loyal voting bloc for the GOP gets to be portrayed as villains in their own TV ads despite being one of the least likely groups in the entire country to become welfare leeches in the first place?
What sort of political movement tells its OWN VOTERS that we not only have to pander to groups who hate us, but that we must pander to them in a way that denigrates our own loyal supporters while simultaneously telling them that they don’t have a right to be outraged in the same way that other groups who have already organized themselves along identitarian lines already do on a routine basis?
The longer you think about it, the more outrageous this blatant double-standard becomes.