My Finance work experience was being a runner at the CBOT in HS...in other words: None. Entertainment only. Automotive focused. Short $TSLA.

No Assassination Coordinates
Joined February 2009
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
SpaceX, OpenAi, Tesla, Nvidia, Broadcom…
Who are the Enron, Tyco, Adelphia, Sunbeam, Worldcom, and Lucent of this cycle?
1
5
19
519
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
On today’s Hedge Fund Telemetry note I explained why I have no interest in Tesla or SpaceX. And why Elon wants to merge his companies. It has to do with a change of control accelerated vesting eliminating all of the crazy awards hurdles with number of cars sold, robotaxis, FSD, robots, and market cap.
4
3
39
6,872
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
He also promised $5000 DOGE refund checks. How’d that work out for everyone?
Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.
59
123
4
704
5,717
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Also worth noting that Musk has a history of making philanthropic pledges and not following through. In 2018, he pledged to “fund fixing the water in any house in Flint that has water contamination above FDA levels.” He did not. nytimes.com/2026/10/19/busin…
43
74
5
292
43,649
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Replying to @ShortingIsFun
Why "next year"? Why not now? Oh yeah, this is one of those things that won't happen.
2
1
3
130
So $SPCX needs to raise money again? Is that what this is cover for?
Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.
4
2
16
525
This is a very clever form of criminal prosecution insurance… “You can’t indict me! You’d be harming millions of children!” $SPCX
$SPCX - ELON MUSK PLEDGES $10 BILLION IN SPACEX SHARES TO U.S. CHILDREN Elon Musk says he will give one SpaceX share to every American child next year. With approximately 73 million children and shares valued at $146.03, the pledge could total $10.7 billion.
2
6
62
1,711
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Trevor Milton rolled a truck down a hill and went to prison for securities fraud. Elon Musk dressed a drone up like a sports car and pretended to produce a flying car. He did it to help justify a desperate trillion dollar SpaceX-Tesla merger. Please do your job, @SECGov
Ce n’était évidemment pas un tesla roadster lors de la démonstration. C’était un Drone adhoc recouvert de la carrosserie du Tesla roadster. Everytime Bien sûr, ce n’était pas la première fois qu’un constructeur faisait ça, mais avant les gens étaient moins cons.
24
245
8
1,727
29,187
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
The fact Elon can’t give a rebuttal to someone as important as yann tells you all you need to know that the event the other night was indeed a farce.
206
477
27
4,673
153,353
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Elon Musk admitted to meeting frequently with Putin and his oligarchs. Sanctioned Russian oligarchs held financial interests in SpaceX, and were shareholders in Musk’s purchase of X. Putin has publicly praised Musk. This is not a coincidence.
36
544
20
1,374
49,230
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
생각할수록 열받네. 삼성 파운드리에 AI5,AI6 맡길 때는 TSMC가 자기들 요구를 안 들어줘서 넘어온 거면서, 온갖 거지 같은 계약 조건 다 요구하고, 특히 팹 내부 정보 제공이랑 Audit까지 요구하면서 가격도 겁나 후려쳐 놓고. 거기다 자기 팹 짓겠다고 삼성 오스틴 팹 현지 인력까지 대거 빼가고 있는 마당에, 정작 삼성 메모리에는 대놓고 저딴 식으로 말한다고? 진짜 어이가 없네.
Replying to @RealNickMugalli
Micron has been reasonable regarding future memory prices, while others have been extortionate, which is something today’s customers won’t forget … Micron is making is the smart move for long-term customer loyalty.
36
155
17
596
100,027
"The problem isn't dreaming big. It's repeatedly selling people those dreams, failing to deliver, and then expecting everyone to applaud the next, even more ridiculous promise without asking what happened to the last one." The Musk Way. $TSLA $SPCX
People seem confused about why Tesla is getting so much backlash over its new "flying Roadster." For those of us who were once genuinely enthusiastic about Tesla, this isn't about hating innovation. It's about a long history of broken promises, misleading expectations, and increasingly absurd marketing. Tesla unveiled the second-generation Roadster in 2017, took customer deposits, and promised deliveries in 2020. Six years past that deadline, it still hasn't delivered the car. Instead, it's demonstrating an even more outrageous version with features that will likely never make it into production. The original 2nd gen Roadster would still be an amazing car today. Why not just deliver what was promised? Then there's Full Self-Driving. Tesla marketed the idea that Model 3 owners could turn their cars into income-generating robotaxis. That never materialized. Even if the technology eventually gets there, the opportunity has already passed for many early buyers. Timing matters. Delivering something a decade late isn't fulfilling the promise you sold to customers. And then there's Solar Roof. Unveiled in 2016 as a revolutionary approach to residential solar, it struggled with costs, installation challenges, and adoption far below expectations. After nearly a decade, Tesla discontinued it entirely in August 2026. Another grand vision abandoned, leaving existing customers with a discontinued product to maintain. Then came the Cybertruck, marketed as a nearly indestructible, revolutionary truck. Instead, we got a vehicle with questionable build quality, numerous recalls, expensive repairs, disappointing results in several real-world off-road tests, and specifications that fell short of the original promises. It literally looks like a dumpster, but aesthetics aside, the collapsing demand speaks volumes about the reality of what Tesla delivered. Another heavily hyped product that fell dramatically short of expectations. This is how consumer trust erodes. Not through one disappointment, but through years of accumulating them. And this is part of the reason why many people who were once enthusiastic about Tesla have become critical and cynical about it. But there's something even more fundamental here: Tesla has completely departed from the grounded, practical vision that made so many of us enthusiastic about the company in the first place. Electric cars were ambitious, but the idea was grounded in reality. People could charge at home, infrastructure could gradually expand, technology could improve, and millions of ordinary people could eventually benefit. There was a realistic path toward mass adoption. What the hell does a flying Roadster powered by compressed-air thrusters have to do with any of that? It's an expensive, impractical engineering stunt with enormous packaging, safety, and regulatory challenges, and no credible near-term path toward mass-market usefulness. Modern electric cars already achieve ridiculous acceleration without this nonsense. What practical problem does it solve? Who actually needs it? When will ordinary consumers benefit? And watching Tesla fans compare this experimental prototype in a Roadster-shaped shell to actual production vehicles people can buy today is ridiculous. What's especially infuriating is the cult-like mentality surrounding all of this. You can't point out the history of failed promises, question the practicality, or demand realistic timelines without being accused of being a "hater" or having "Elon derangement syndrome." Tesla deserves recognition for helping make electric cars a reality, but that success doesn't give it a blank check to keep marketing increasingly fantastical promises while failing to deliver on previous commitments. This isn't hatred. It's disappointment from people who once believed in the company, watched it accomplish extraordinary things, and have since watched it increasingly substitute practical innovation with spectacle and promises. Elon fanboys are also ignoring a bigger pattern that goes beyond Tesla. What made many of us enthusiastic about Elon and Tesla and in the first place was a grounded vision of technological progress that could genuinely improve millions of lives. Electric cars were ambitious, but practical, achievable, and useful to ordinary people. Now we're supposed to get excited about flying cars with compressed-air thrusters that have no credible path to mass adoption and solve no meaningful problem for the average consumer. It's the same kind of thinking behind marketing the colonization of Mars as some urgent necessity for humanity's survival. There's nothing wrong with space exploration, but Earth isn't about to become uninhabitable because of the Sun. We're talking about geological timescales, while humanity faces enormous problems RIGHT NOW: poverty, hunger, access to education, corruption, abuse of power, wars, and a lack of government accountability. We have plenty of very real problems to solve before worrying about humanity's survival on another planet. And then there's DOGE. I was genuinely excited about the original idea of making government more efficient, reducing waste, and increasing accountability. Instead, we got questionable savings figures, inexperienced people making sweeping decisions, serious concerns over access to sensitive personal information, and an initiative that ultimately fizzled out without delivering its grand promises. Another enormous narrative that fell apart when confronted with reality. That's what makes all of this so frustrating. It's not that we stopped believing in technological progress. It's that we've watched someone who once pursued grounded, transformative ideas increasingly embrace fantastical promises, political spectacle, and questionable narratives disconnected from practical reality. And somehow, pointing out this history of disappointment gets you labeled a "hater" or accused of having "Elon derangement syndrome." The problem isn't dreaming big. It's repeatedly selling people those dreams, failing to deliver, and then expecting everyone to applaud the next, even more ridiculous promise without asking what happened to the last one. The world doesn't need more spectacular promises. It needs practical solutions to real problems, honest expectations, and accountability for what was promised. That's what made Tesla exciting in the first place, and that's what so many of us feel has been betrayed.
3
8
38
956
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Alex Gibney: “A lot of these deaths related to Full Self Driving or Autopilot, 67 so far. If that had happened at GM over a brake malfunction, it would be massive congressional hearings. A lot of those things were settled so the actual facts of the matter wouldn’t come to light. In the film, we have the case of one which is a pedestrian who was killed by a runaway Tesla with malfunctioning Autopilot. They took that to trial and won a rather massive judgement and the evidence is overwhelming not only how bad the system was, but also how hard Tesla tried to hide the evidence of malfeasance. In a lot of cases, Autopilot has a function where milliseconds before the car slams into a wall, Autopilot will turn off, and so Tesla can say with a straight face Autopilot was not engaged at the time of the crash”
66
1,235
52
3,004
103,884
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Musk does not invent. He appropriates the work of others.
Perfect reply to Elon’s flying car by Bugatti’s CEO.
3
2
12
422
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Guy who said we would have coast to coast self driving cars in 2019 and 1 million robotaxis in 2020 says advertisers aren't allowed to overstate claims anymore. 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣 LOL 😆 😂 🤣 😅 😄
Going forward, all advertising on 𝕏 will be subject to a reasonable esthetic standard. Advertisers who post ads that are ugly, shrill, strident or overstate claims about their product will be barred from advertising.
229
423
15
6,414
195,691
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Of all the things that will never happen. This will never happen the most.
Replying to @Scobleizer
True. You will be able to ask the Roadster to perform any of the tricks shown autonomously, as it will be sentient. Also, we will have a wild looping track (crazier even than Hot Wheels) at our Texas HQ where you can test out your Roadster.
109
107
2
3,009
115,978
Suspected Saboteur retweeted
Tesla always introducing new innovative ways to die in a car
39
2,209
39
20,578
131,465