Safe For Pandas

I mean, we all have eyes… Only 1 foot leading, tge other behind him the entire time in contact with the floor. Completely the opposite to what you’ve said.

@SjWiLKiN @SkyNews @3lectricRich

@Liverbird6times @ivegotSowell @Carra23 @GNev2

The law literally states that at the point Giles plays the ball, Johnson is considered not to have gained an advantage from being in an offside position.

Incorrect, the rule literally states this, Giles has technically played the ball to Johnson, which is the whole point of this section of the rule.

Here’s the rules - Giles , the second Hull player to touch the ball before Johnson, deliberately plays the ball according to this wording and so Johnson should have judged to not have gained an advantage from being offside from Armstrong’s shot.

Johnson must have go-go-gadget legs to challenge from a yard away…

Sigh. Read the rule again, success of the clearance is irrelevan, stated in the last paragraph I posted. Going to keep posting it over and over until people read it fully.

Again, the rule states that as soon as Giles deliberately plays the ball, Johnson is considered to not have gained an advantage. I’ll keep posting it until people read it…

Johnson is a yard away from him, hardly under pressure.

Yes, Dale, the rule literally states this. Here it is again in black and white for you to read.

If Mendy’s block was the only touch, then you’d be correct, but Giles then attempts to clear the ball. The rules literally state this is classed as a deliberate play and even state it being unsuccessful does not negate this fact.