Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom) header
Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom) profile picture

🌻 Real normie mom & nurse. History nerd. Only women are women. America FIRST! šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø Opinions are my own & arent for sale. New Podcast eps soon! šŸŽ™ļø#RealRightMom

The Free State of Florida, USA
Joined March 2025
Photo by Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom)Photo by Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom)Photo by Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom)Photo by Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom)Photo by Colleen OConor (@RealRightMom)
I hope the one man you’re talking about is Thomas Massie. If it were up to Trump, we wouldn’t have them.
7
7
329
13,750
Colleen OConor retweeted
There are easily several hundred Operation Mockingbird style admin assets on the right wing and it has never been clearer than this week. Their specific purpose is to act as independent journalists, political commentators and social media influencers that get paid directly or indirectly to act as the decentralized mainstream media. They are compensated in a multitude of formats that span from direct payments to sponsorships to signal boosts from admin affiliates to exclusive and/or limited access to information that allows them to capitalize on breaking stories. They find the ones who have the least integrity and the best acting skills. They prop them up, feed them opportunities and get them so hooked on fame and consistent cash flow that they eventually have no other means of income. Once they have developed reliable cash flow, they are dependent on these flows to sustain their lifestyle. They become a media company. They employ people. They build networks and absorb smaller creators under their umbrella using the same format. Eventually, those who flow them cash and access find ways to bend their initial principles while continuing the illusion of independence. They become financially trapped by this structure at a certain point, where they have to decide to be a useful tool of a greater purpose or go back out on their own without the advantages they've leaned on for years. Many likely figure that being "part of something bigger" is actually ok, so long as they believe the ends justify the means. "What's a lie or a deception here and there if it theoretically serves a greater good?" is what I imagine they think. Sooner or later, it becomes much easier to just go along to get along. To be part of the machine. To be an operative. These are the people who sit atop the pyramid of "independent" political influence now. At some point they decided that they needed to protect themselves, their family, their income and their personal legend. Even, perhaps, at the cost of the country or the constituency they originally sought to stand up for. I don't believe they are bad people, but I believe many of them have simply lost their way. We can not let these people enrich themselves by lying to us and carrying water for the admin any longer. They must be called to task. They must be loudly rebuked until they either change course or lose their influence. They will be discarded by the same machine that propped them up once their influence evaporates. This will force the power players to seek fresh faces to corrupt or control in the same way. The people, if they are to participate in the conversation of changing hearts and minds, must heighten their awareness of this reality. Force themselves to maximize their discernment and either join the conversation or elevate voices they trust will not be controlled in the same way. This will be an ongoing process, but if there was to be any meaningful change in the short term, we must understand that primary season will be here in just a few months. If we don't choose where to focus our attention wisely between now and then, we will be presented with the exact same crop of do-nothing representatives that will lead us down the same path again. We will look at the primary candidates and say "I don't like or trust any of these people, is this the best we've got?" You, the individual, have the power to influence this process now more than ever. Proceed accordingly.
91
238
38
1,519
80,850
A week before the election I went on NewsMax and said we would lose the midterms, and overwhelmingly because of young voters. After the segment wrapped, I asked the host if he’d be willing to have me back after the election loss to have an HONEST conversation with their mostly older audience about why this truly happened. The day after the election they asked me to come on for my truthful analysis. Then, they cancelled me from the show and replaced me with two older guys who went on and blamed ā€œcheatingā€ and ā€œCalifornia transplants in red statesā€ for what happened. Today I again tried broaching this subject with my mostly older Facebook audience. Instantly my comments were flooded. ā€œNo, Brandon, we lost because they cheated. We lost because of fraud.ā€ It feels like we’re living in hell because the largest sect of our voting base is being lied to and misled by cable news media on our own side. We are doomed to keep repeating Tuesday night over and over for the next serval election cycles- until the younger conservative voting base becomes the only voting base left on the right- if we can’t get our people in the older demos to understand what is going on. Why is conservative cable news doing this?? Obviously I believe that they want to see Conservative leadership. But I don’t believe for a second that they don’t know the truth about what is happening. So why are they willfully misinforming their older audience and setting us up for repeated failure? We have to find a way to change this.
188
120
11
575
24,720
Diabolical, but it’s still on him. He let the snakes into the garden.
The real way MAGA works. Lobbying firms pay ā€œinfluencersā€ to push talking points. Susie would have staffers print out tweets going viral (via bots) by ā€œhis biggest supportersā€ to show Trump that an issue mattered to the base. This is why you got fucked and they got richer.
4
Colleen OConor retweeted
This week is why I'm tired of hearing about Tucker Carlson. Three people got spectacularly wealthy by their proximity to Trump - Susie Wiles, James Blair, and Chris LaCivita. It was their job to win the midterms. They failed catastrophically. Yet my timeline is full of Tucker this, Nick Fuentes that. Was it Tucker who sold MAHA out to Bayer and gas station heroin companies? Was it Fuentes who said that mass deportations were unpopular, and that Trump should stop them? Was it Candace telling Trump that 94% of MAGA supported the Iran war? Was it Comic Dave Smith saying that Trump should tell people who wanted the Epstein files to be unsealed to sit out the midterms? Did they take $10,000,000 a year for 5 years for a "job" - corruption of such unbelievability that it wouldn't clear the writers room of the Sopranos. We are such a childish culture that we don't know how to appoint accountability. Or are afraid to. People go after Nick and Tucker because it's safe. Nobody will lose their access to the White House. Nobody will have the goon squads coordinate in group chats about them. Some may even be rewarded by head pats or maybe receive a small allowance from a billionaire donor. Where as if you bring up corruption within the White House, there's a problem. Admin figures won't go on the YouTube slop shows. You won't get invited to events. I was specifically black listed from the Easter Egg roll. That's how petty these people are. My kid couldn't go the White House because I wouldn't shill for the Iran war. Anyone who spends their time on Tucker / Candace / Nick while never reporting on the real corruption and self-enrichment are telling on themselves. They sold their souls to stay in the good graces of very disgusting people. They sold you out. Now none of this means you shouldn't criticize anyone. I don't like that Tucker calls himself "just a podcaster." I don't call myself an "influencer." Like it or not, we have a higher calling from God. People are modeling themselves and forming their worldviews on what they read and watch and listen to. This doesn't make anyone responsible for what someone else does, but we should all feel a heavy weight each night. We should feel inadequate to the task. Like we failed somehow, but will nevertheless wake up the next day and do it all over again. Even so, what exactly can Tucker (or I) do? He can't control information flow to Trump. He doesn't come from a lobbying shop that made $100,000,000 last year and this year, and that has richly rewarded him. I sometimes watch his show and see his posts, most of the time I don't. That's not shade or negging. Nobody is reading all of my posts. Let's be real here. Everyone is busy. Every day, James / Chris / Susie have access to Trump. They are rich beyond your wildest dreams. What did they do with this power? Why doesn't anyone ever ask about *that*? We all know why. There are real consequences to taking on the big industries that we were sold out to. They'll plant stories, send out group chats to go after you, try getting you fired, and threaten to kill you. The good news of an ass kicking is that there's no way to rationalize it. A close election could have led to excuse making. We are now facing a disaster. TEXAS IS BLUE. Because Grassley and the Senate refused to modify outdated rules, Democrats are in control of Cabinet appointments for at least the next 4 years. There are people responsible for this. Very rich and powerful people. Let's see more discussion of them.
509
1,593
116
10,425
603,250
Colleen OConor retweeted
The Great Betrayal
4,904
20,565
1,848
101,113
5,710,138
I’m a Republican. Watching the GOP get fired warms my heart. We were promised peace. We got war - and the bill for slaughtering children in Gaza. Democrats, don’t get comfortable. We’ll fire you, too.
34
195
15
912
26,305
Colleen OConor retweeted
Dave Smith: ā€œI will not vote for anybody who’s attached to this administration . . . I’m not supporting the regime who lied us into war. If Joe Kent ran, I'm open to that. If Thomas Massie ran. If Tucker Carlson ran . . . I'm not voting for a socialist, I’m not voting for a woke Democrat, and I’m not voting for a neocon."
206
526
35
5,069
254,891
In the wake of the blue tsunami, @ComicDaveSmith lays out the blueprint for the Republican come-back in 2028: • No new wars • America first • Bring prices down • Secure borders But it only works if they repudiate Donald Trump's war of aggression.
63
123
6
1,247
44,795
Colleen OConor retweeted
Panicans > Plan Trusters
6
31
1
366
12,929
Colleen OConor retweeted
MAGA is dead… forever. It’s not just 2026. It’s 2028. Vance can’t win. Rubio can’t win. You are all so incredibly clueless.
1,558
3,249
349
20,183
580,034
Well this is awkward
The Andrew (Pickles) Wilson vs Erika Kirk debate is even FUNNIER! This was his "smoking gun" evidence. 🤣
5
73
Colleen OConor retweeted
The people who knew Russiagate was a scam were right. The people who opposed lockdowns and mandates were right. The people who opposed funding Ukraine were right. The people who opposed funded Israel were right. The people who didn’t want to invade Iran were right.
1,173
4,251
204
29,135
468,330
🚨 Who’s ready to #FlockOff? I’m launching a grassroots initiative to place eye-catching signage on or near as many Flock cameras as possible. Vandalism is illegal. Raising awareness is not. An informed public is the first step toward protecting our privacy and pushing back against unchecked surveillance. Simple, bold signs that state the obvious + a QR code linking to more info (like Deflock). We need your help to make this happen: • Creative minds for sign designs • Sign companies willing to print them as a service to our country • A donation system to fund production • Help building the QR destination page with full explanations and resources. Who’s in?! Drop a comment, share this, or tag someone who can help. Let’s do this, America šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø #FlockOff #DeflockTheCameras #PrivacyMatters #FourthAmendment #Grassroots
1
3
267
We need to talk about these Flock cameras. #FlockSafety #PrivacyRights #FourthAmendment
4
126
I’m back, y’all šŸ˜Ž
Can’t we get some term limits around here? šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø #TermLimits #MitchMcConnell #Politics
1
1
11
329
Colleen OConor retweeted
So, now we know the score. As things stand now, there are 104 Americans in Congress and 314 Israelis.
U.S. House of Representatives votes down Rep. Thomas Massie's amendment to cut aid to Israel, 104-314.
1,467
11,953
243
52,977
879,468
Can’t we get some term limits around here? šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø #TermLimits #MitchMcConnell #Politics
2
1
5
479
Colleen OConor retweeted
ā€œYou hated Charlie.ā€ ā€œYou want to destroy what he built.ā€ ā€œIt’s a grift!!!ā€ What genius approved these lines of attack against people who supported Charlie, were impressed by his mission, work ethic, and success, and further, were outraged and horrified by his well orchestrated public death…merely because they don’t believe the government has made an honest or compelling case, and they don’t want a patsy (also someone’s child) to be unjustly sentenced to death? It’s obscene. It’s not working. And, it is inviting further disbelief, fury, and resolve for real justice.
158
527
27
4,775
90,456
Colleen OConor retweeted
When American POWs tried to sneak her notes with their personal information to tell their families they were still alive, she gave them to the North Vietnamese. Some of them were beaten to death. You are both commies and you can both fuck off.
Angelenos need leaders willing to stand up and speak out. Jane has never been afraid to do either
5,729
27,574
1,604
112,089
3,680,079