81 percent of syphilis, 71 percent of HIV, and 63 percent of gonorrhea comes solely from the tiny 1-2 percent gay male population WHO reports that tens of millions of people will die because of the disintegrating efficacy of antibiotics due to antibiotic immunity, this antiviral immunity comes from continuous exposure to the drug, and also equally affects those who’ve decided to never be infected with an STD before (chastity), as the bacteria immunization process makes it not just resistant to those who are on the antibiotic medication, but also on those who’ve never received an antibiotic before. “How does two gay people personally affect you and society” They say this as homosexuals quite literally destroy the utility of one of the highest per capita life saving medicine inventions in human history - antibiotics The mass artificial infection rate of homosexuals goes way beyond the average normal sexuality individual. Even “conservative” homosexuals have higher STD rates than sexually risky heterosexuals. This mass preventable epidemic of disease requires lifelong antibiotics through a continuous cycle of gays getting infected by these bacteria along with DOXYprep, a preventative antibiotic STD medication that 53 percent of gay men regularly take throughout most of their life, and a staggering 20 percent of gay men have HIV. To anyone who is sane, they can understand that the mellifluous and theoretical socially liberal descriptions for society do not hold up with the real civilisation that we live in. The allowance of degenerate behaviors of a subgroup coalesces into an intractable parasitic ghettoised underground population that causes most of the major problems without ever being held accountable, think of the 1 percent of people committing 2/3rds of violent crime, or how 93 percent of psychopaths are in or have been in a form of criminal punishment while being a tiny share of the population. When you give these people an inch on the basis of subjectivist claims which hold that morality itself doesn’t determine what should be ostracized, instead freedom with no regulation - blind universalism, should take the steering wheel — you end up with an epidemic of explosive crashes. Society is like driving, someone else’s behavior has inevitable implications for others, car crashes are everybody’s business, and also effect those generally who aren’t involved in the crashes when those crashes become a regular occurrence. Social norms function by collective adherence, if a few people start to violate them, it opens the grounds for large scale violation from others, which inexorably destroys the stability of the norm, as a norm requires mutual trust, if there’s no reliable manner of enforcing this due to mass recalcitrance to the norm, then it becomes impossible to depend upon someone to mutually obey a given social norm without getting the bad end of the stick (example of a prisoners dilemma). Society functions like an economy. The dating market works this way through hypergamy on tinder artificially inflating female dating standards (demand), which subsequently forces men to accommodate these new standards if they want to a acquire a mate (supply, men who’ve never participated in this social dynamic will be equally affected by it then, as the women now have higher standards for all men, including them, even if they did nothing. Another example is the evolutionary female stigmatization of whores. Females control sex, and carefully trade giving men sex in return for commitment, the other end which men control. When women end their bargaining power by offering free sex to men (cohabiting/hookups, fornication), it gives men no incentive to commit to the women who’ve given them what they’ve wanted. Other women now have no leverage when they rightly demand commitment for sex, as men have the leverage through alternatives, sex is now available to them without commitment, so the woman’s demands are no longer met.