Pinned Tweet
Nature at its most BEAUTIFUL and RUTHLESS
xitter.cf/Brutalclips01/status/2…
Radhe retweeted
Won’t say it’s “easily achievable” but I haven’t dated over 25 in 5 years. There’s a core of younger women who want MEN, and the daddy thing is big online (Lana Del Rey, coquette, etc.). Hit the gym, have a a few bucks, be charismatic, have actual manly skills, keep your hair ..
Radhe retweeted
8 alimentos que todo hombre debería conocer para cuidar su energía y salud sexual:
1/ Ajo
Radhe retweeted
Woman who lost her battle with cancer left behind a note on what matters most (2017)
[via/ FB Holly Butcher]
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This shows a modern paraphrased version of Holly Butcher's letter, not the original. She left real life advice before dying of Ewing's sarcoma on Jan. 4, 2018; family posted it on her Facebook. The photo is hers.
facebook.com/hollybutcher90…
abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/aust…
Radhe retweeted
Live fully now, stop stressing the trivial, prioritise presence and memories with the people you love over chasing stuff, treat your body kindly, and give more than you complain.
Woman who lost her battle with cancer left behind a note on what matters most (2017)
[via/ FB Holly Butcher]
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This shows a modern paraphrased version of Holly Butcher's letter, not the original. She left real life advice before dying of Ewing's sarcoma on Jan. 4, 2018; family posted it on her Facebook. The photo is hers.
facebook.com/hollybutcher90…
abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/aust…
Radhe retweeted
•Scrolling X
•Ovulating
•Your scent
•Deep conversations
•Quality time
•Your voice
•Neck kisses + eye contact
•Your arms, hands, or veins
•Lingering eye contact
•Pulling her close confidently
•Feeling emotionally safe
•Genuinely liking you
•Before her period
Radhe retweeted
Courage is the doorway to freedom.
Majority of people think freedom comes from having more money, more options, more things…
But what they can’t see is what it actually takes to get more.
Their worldview is backwards.
They think they’ll feel like enough when they have enough.
But really, their worldview is a mirror of their internal state.
The reflection changes after they do.
This is the sequence:
BE -> DO -> HAVE
- Shift your identity into the person you need to become
- Align your thoughts, behaviors, and habits with that person
- Receive everything that person has
Fear is ultimately what keeps people from stepping into courage.
- Fear of failure
- Fear of rejection
- Fear of being judged
- Fear of making the wrong decision
So they overthink. Wait. Procrastinate.
They convince themselves they’re being rational and smart.
Their peers will usually reinforce these self limiting beliefs, making it near impossible to break the mold without being outcasted.
So the safer option is to daydream instead.
They read all the books, and watch all the videos of people living the life they should be living. Even if the dopamine hit doesn’t last, it still feels good for a few minutes.
And life eventually passes them by, which becomes more like a living hell. Angry at the world for being unfulfilled due to their own lack of action and courage.
Exit hell. Enter heaven.
Radhe retweeted
"Introduction to Probability" by Charles M. Grinstead and J. Laurie Snell is a university-level textbook published by the American Mathematical Society that has become a classic introduction to probability theory.
With over 500 pages, the book provides a comprehensive treatment of probability, combining rigorous mathematical foundations with intuitive explanations, worked examples, exercises, and computer simulations.
It covers discrete and continuous probability distributions, conditional probability, independence, expected values, variance, the law of large numbers, the central limit theorem, Markov chains, and random walks. The full book is available free online.
chance.dartmouth.edu/teachin…
Radhe retweeted
Some thoughts, some myth and some gynecentric social programming to review here.
“How do you then solve for loneliness”
Define loneliness - my worst, most “alone facing responsibilities” was being married to a Christian feminist from a Darbyist cultist family.
Currently I live with one primary “wife” together for 11 years and date locally and travel to see five other women I have established relationships with.
“the need to produce and raise offspring.”
If I were to do it again, I’d have just bought the house for the kids but never gotten married or promised monogamy. It would have been easier and not married you have more rights to your kids “single” (one of the horrible things about the fraudulent marriage contract laws)
the need to build a loving family?
Did that locked down and spent a decade planning how to leave after the kids were grown. Ive remained very close with my children I raised.
If you can't find a woman you will trust, if you don't take the risk, you're left with living alone in your small apartment,
After seven years 9/10 marriages are sexless, you can live multiple decades rotting alone in a separate bed and bedroom with a parasitic wife that despises you.
“slowly getting older, with gradually less interest from women and for sex.”
This is a myth - one of those boomerist myths that projects female decline onto male decline. Be fit and enjoy sexual intimacy with women and basically the lopsided dating market “flips” in favor of men.
It becomes an unending cornucopia. And the women that are low sex drive “remove themselves” from the dating market because they have lost their fertility leverage and now have to “prove” their worth for sexuality and intimacy.
Some men and women - particularly when unhealthy will lose desire for sex - with 7/10 overweight or obese population in the US it’s almost guaranteed. It’s not the desire or ability it’s the health.
I’m almost 60 myself (59) my sex drive keeps up with all of the “three a day” women I’ve found and collected. Desire for daily sex is common with healthy women 40+ a healthy older man can easily match that.
I’m always surprised by how many men hate dating and the hunt, but it isn’t the hunt that’s the problem it’s the willingness. There is a special excitement with seduction of a new unknown woman, like many seducers I find that a bit addictive.
Add to all that is a man 40+ dating women 30+ the “close rate” becomes astoundingly high. Sexual desire peak and fertility peak in women is completely separated.
Radhe retweeted
This is where fortunes are built in commodity cycles.
When quality names like Cameco ($CCJ), NexGen ($NXE), and Denison ($DNN) are sitting 40% to 50%+ off their peaks despite the structural #nuclear supply deficit growing wider every month, emotional retail sellers are handing over institutional-grade entry setups.
This is the classic "Get Right and Sit Tight" phase:
🔵Fundamentals haven't changed: Tech buildouts, grid baseload demands, and nuclear reactor restarts are locking in multi-year #uranium demand that supply simply cannot fulfill.
🔵Technicals tell you HOW to enter: You don't jump in with all your capital at once. You use wave structure and technical levels to scale in systematically through the drawdowns.
🔵Capital discipline: Cyclical washouts shake out impatient daytraders so patient, long-term capital can position ahead of the next structural wave up.
When high-conviction assets get deeply oversold without a change in the core macro thesis, you don't panic. Map your risk, scale in calmly, and let time do the heavy lifting.
There isn’t a #uranium developer or producer that hasn’t taken a serious hit from its 5-year highs.
I know 90% of investors don’t want to hear this, but this could be the opportunity.
I feel for investors who are deeply underwater. I’ve been through these brutal cycles several times in my career, and you learn a few things along the way.
In my opinion, uranium equities look deeply oversold, with no single obvious reason justifying the scale of the sell-off.
Could they fall further? Of course.
But I’m taking my chances and scaling in little by little.
Not financial advice. Just my opinion.
Radhe retweeted
A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life.
At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday."
He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy.
Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system.
He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting.
He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way."
The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.
Radhe retweeted
Setting aside my complaints of foidsplaining
Women dressing scantily in the gym is an instinctual psychological holdover of more primal origin that was meant to occur within a specific subgroup of the tribe (virile men and women). Actually an overriding of feminist programming.
Radhe retweeted
Some cultures were pretty fricken Metal. 😂
Language Warning! This Soulfly Back To The Primitive.
Radhe retweeted
BJP's Interterence in Islamic matters
UNACCEPTABLE! You must apologise! #Kashmir