Raamsay retweeted
BREAKING NEWS! This👇 Violent Scumbag who assaulted Two Female GMP Armed Officers at Manchester Airport breaking PC Lydia Wards nose & Head-butting & punching a member of public Today LOST his Appeal to Appeal against his 3.5yrs Prison Sentence & Rightly so; he actually (In my opinion) got away with another ABH on Armed Officer PC Marsden too👇
Raamsay retweeted
Großbritannien liefert uns gerade das ultimative Meisterstück zivilen Ungehorsams. Ein 76-jähriger Rentner wird bei einer Demo gegen die Migrationspolitik verhaftet. Der Vorwurf?
Vermummung. Sein Outfit? Eine Burka.
Jetzt erschien er in genau dieser Vollverschleierung – stilsicher ergänzt durch eine schwarze Handtasche – vor dem Amtsgericht in Portsmouth und plädierte auf nicht schuldig.
Seine Verteidigungsstrategie ist ein brillanter Frontalangriff auf die herrschende Doppelmoral:
Er beruft sich auf eine „religiöse Ausnahmegenehmigung“.
Da der Islam in der heutigen Zeit offenbar die meisten Vorteile biete, wolle er diese Religion „von der anderen Seite des Schleiers“ studieren.
Eine rein spirituelle Findungsphase eines neugierigen Geistes, versteht sich.
Von Identitätsverschleierung könne zudem keine Rede sein, schließlich sei er von sämtlichen Polizeikameras und Drohnen gefilmt worden.
Mit dieser Aktion treibt der Mann, der seine Verteidigung per Crowdfunding finanziert, eine völlig überforderte Justiz in die Enge.
Er zwingt ein System, dem er den fatalen Weg in eine „islamische Gesellschaft“ attestiert, zum juristischen Spagat.
Verurteilt der Richter ihn bis zur Fortsetzung des Prozesses im Februar, offenbart sich die Heuchelei der Toleranz.
Lässt man ihn gewähren, wird das Vermummungsverbot zur absoluten Lachnummer.
Während echte Kriminelle ihr Gesicht verbergen und Parallelgesellschaften ungestört wachsen, macht der Staat Jagd auf einen Rentner im Gewand, der den Rechtsstaat mit dessen eigenen absurden Regeln schlägt.
Chapeau für dieses satirische Schachmatt!
#Großbritannien #Doppelmoral #Burka
welt.de/vermischtes/article6… via @welt
How do they individually reconcile their part in this disaster?
Sleep must be at a premium.
BIRMINGHAM WAS FIRST WARNED IN 1985. GIRLS IN ITS CARE WERE STILL REPORTING RAPE IN 1991. COUNCILLORS VOTED AGAINST AN INQUIRY IN 1995. AND IN 2015, POLICE HAD IDENTIFIED MORE THAN 700 CHILDREN AT RISK AND 372 SUSPECTS.
Now consider this.
Jess Phillips was Birmingham City Council's appointed Victims' Champion when Jill Jesson publicly alleged that evidence had been removed from her report and copies ordered destroyed.
She was still in post when Birmingham went to the High Court over men suspected of sexually exploiting a girl in its care. And when the police produced their confidential assessment identifying hundreds of potential victims and suspects.
She later became the government's safeguarding minister. She rejected Oldham's request for a government-led inquiry. She fought against a national inquiry.
Only after leaving ministerial office, she signed a letter calling for Birmingham to be investigated.
- What did Jess Phillips know?
- What did she do?
- And what representations did she make while she held those positions of responsibility?
I've brought together TEN KEY DATES spanning forty-one years of Birmingham's rape gang scandal.
The documents, the decisions, the allegations of destroyed evidence, the police intelligence and the questions Baroness Longfield's statutory inquiry must answer.
The girls deserved protection. They deserve the truth.
THE FULL INVESTIGATION WILL BE RELEASED ON RED WALL AND THE RABBLE
🔴 Sign Up Here
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
For years, we have challenged the official accounts and pursued the evidence others failed to confront. Now Birmingham is on the national inquiry's list. We must ensure the inquiry goes all the way.
Please read, share and help fund the investigations. Every paid subscription helps keep this work available to everyone.
Raja Miah MBE
Now do the same for France, Afghanistan , Albania,Sudan and Somalia - might produce a positive outcome?
A “perfunctory political gimmick”.
The Eritrean UK's embassy response to Shabana Mahmood's threat to withdraw all visa's to the UK until the government agrees to start taking back it's failed asylum seekers and criminals.
Since the UK hasn't issued a single visa since 2023, you might have thought Mahmood would consider the response to empty guffage before going public with it.
But, this is Labour after all.
A rambling oaf - just so twisted it is uncomfortable to witness.
John Swinney simply cannot respond when asked by @lucyidunn about the SNP’s time-limited commitment to the triple lock made during the 2014 referendum campaign. He ignores the question and just witlessly recites his prepared remarks.
Raamsay retweeted
Guess which foreign power gave Labour MPs these sums:
Andy Burnham £393,346
Lisa Nandy £184,219
Rachel Reeves £348,652
John Healey £39,216
Shabana Mahmood £137,168
Wes Streeting £459,182
Yvette Cooper £144,650
Angela Rayner £86,800
Chris Bryant £130,940
Raamsay retweeted
Not one female Labour backbencher turned up to Parliament for the debate about dumping 1,200 illegal male migrants in an army camp in Piddington.
Labour have so far, refused to meet a single woman from Piddington.
Labour only care about women when it’s convenient for them.
Raamsay retweeted
Ground hog day!
Yet again I find myself at Surrey County Council calling for them to release the report into the Council’s interactions with Pride in Surrey and Stephen Ireland.
I first requested the review back in August 2024 following Ireland’s conviction for child sex offences including the rape of a 12 year old boy. I had serious concerns about how the Council was dealing with safeguarding issues raised by councillors, officers and members of the public. Here’s my story.
express.co.uk/news/politics/…
From the answer I received (not shown in below clip as the answer takes place later in the session bundled with other responses) it appears that officers facing criticism in the report are holding up its release. It’s vitally important that we see the findings of this review asap so that any necessary actions can be taken. Any officer that has not done their job, needs to be held to account.
The Leader also confirmed that the report would be released in the next few weeks. But let’s face it, I’ve heard that many times before so I’ll believe it when I see it.
Is this man’s business being targeted?
Today, I’m swallowing my pride and asking for your help to save my restaurant.
Running a restaurant is more than a business to me. It’s my passion, my livelihood, and something I’ve worked incredibly hard to build.
We’re facing one of our hardest times. Right now, @Google is accepting only 1-star fake reviews, while genuine 5-star reviews from customers are not being accepted. You can try posting a 5-star review and see for yourself. This is seriously affecting our business. With outstanding rent and our landlord threatening court proceedings, the pressure is unbearable.
I never imagined making a post like this, but sometimes you have to set pride aside and ask for help. 🙏
Please book a table at Singh’s Dining. Come enjoy our food, experience our hospitality, and see what we’re all about.
We’re proud to be a non-Halal restaurant and want to keep serving our community for years to come.
If you can’t visit, please share this post with friends and family. Every booking, share, and bit of support means more than you can imagine.
❤️ Please help us keep Singh’s Dining open. ❤️
From the bottom of my heart, thank you to everyone who has supported us. We need you now more than ever.
🙏 Please book. Please share. Please help us survive.
singhsdining.com
#SaveSinghsDining
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The claim of Google conspiring against him is unsupported & appears aimed at soliciting 5star reviews. No clear evidence of review bombing exists; there are just 18 reviews across ratings. The owner’s responses to genuine customer concerns may help explain its unpopularity.
share.google/T7GoPuHsibAsH2…
share.google/sCkuAYbY8gWFHb…
share.google/2zQ0DPzPTW1HEP…
Summary
As a "journalist" I'm surprised @KennyFarq doesn't see what's happened as a 'Watergate' moment.
A conspiracy to imprison an innocent man. A process 'tainted with apparent bias', the complainers rewarded financially, promoted beyond their ability, conspirators gerrymandered into seats. All that against a backdrop of a demonstrably corrupt judicial system headed by a Lord Advocate that sits in cabinet.
This should be the stuff of wet dreams to any investigative journalist. I guess he's just a washed out old hack not wanting to rock the gravy boat.






























