I think the Lizard People have surrendered to Bitcoin Core, which, if true, means that we have an extremely powerful tool in popular open source software, categorically. It's too hard to slip in corruption with all the world's most competent eyeballs watching. The Lizards are now trying to centralize keys. We need to make self custody as realistic as possible and not let them reach whatever tipping point of keys they calculated. Notice, that while the details differ, they are running they same playbook as they did with centralizing gold. Gold failed because it's various properties made it vulnerable to capture by central bankers. Gold was too expensive/burdensome/risky to self-custody. Notice, again, the narratives emerging from the CC heist. "Screw it, self-custody is too hard, I'm moving to an exchange." "They did everything right." "Death of self-custody." Each hack/heist encourages the average Bitcoiner to conclude that self-custody isn't worth the risk. That their odds are better with a "well-trusted" institution holding their keys instead. That an institution is the easy button. If you were a lizard, you'd attempt to introduce critical bugs in specialized HWWs (and their related software stacks) to encourage this migration to institutions. Each bot repeating that Core is too hard to learn, that something like Yeti Cold is too tedious, advances the Lizard's goal of key centralization. Call to action: make self-custody as realistic as possible. Reject specialized HWWs. Take one Saturday to learn how Core actually works, it's just software. Learn how to secure generational wealth, it's not beyond you. And pass the knowledge you learn onto the next pleb. Follow these anons to learn more. @JWWeatherman_ @heavilyarmedc @BenWestgate_ @LibertyMugs @epic_curious