ROSS retweeted
Replying to @ROSSIntel
@RossIntel's request for more time to file its formal request for an en bank rehearing of a 3d Cir panel's decision against it in the @ThomsonReuters case has been ministerially granted. Look for that submission by or on 11/3:
ROSS retweeted
what data was this trained on?
Introducing GLM-Legal
Built on GLM-5.3-Flash, GLM-Legal matches frontier models on mainstream legal benchmarks.
Designed for real legal workflows: contract review, evidence analysis, compliance, and more.
Tech Blog: z.ai/blog/glm-legal
Apply for API Access: z.ai/consultation/legal
Try AutoClaw: autoclaw.z.ai
ROSS retweeted
The most likely long-term outcome of the AI boom will be massive capital destruction in the US, with market share going to cheaper open-source Chinese models, according to Jefferies. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
ROSS retweeted
AI copyright litigation in the USA is brought to you by Franz Kafka
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_Oct 11Canada
CanadaConnected via Canada Android AppAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, and Hachette are using Claude and ChatGPT to email literary agents, write publicity and back-cover copy, design cover art, marketing materials, and draft rejection letters. AI use among authors is apparently also rampant now behind the scenes.
ROSS retweeted
👀
“ROSS is the only appellate guidance available, and it should inform every AI training-data decision now.”
bakerdonelson.com/third-circ…
ROSS retweeted
Breaking: @RossIntel will soon, but not yet, move for an en banc rehearing of the recent 3d Circ panel decision against it in @ThomsonReuter's © infringement suit. For now, they've filed a 21-day extension to make that ask, which plaintiffs' do not oppose:
ROSS retweeted
“Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions.”
Replying to @syfert
I wouldn’t sleep on it. Will depend on discovery and expert reports, but I think it has legs.
Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions. See Steves & Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., 988 F.3d 690 (4th Cir. 2021), affirming 345 F. Supp. 3d 614 (E.D. Va. 2018).
ROSS retweeted
Replying to @syfert
I wouldn’t sleep on it. Will depend on discovery and expert reports, but I think it has legs.
Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions. See Steves & Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., 988 F.3d 690 (4th Cir. 2021), affirming 345 F. Supp. 3d 614 (E.D. Va. 2018).
ROSS retweeted
.@musicbizworld ran the math on what the TR v. ROSS decision means for Suno
60,202 recordings in the second suit, at the statutory maximum, is a ceiling just over $9 billion
“A market for licensing training data counts even if the rights holder never licensed into it... Suno pleads 60,202 recordings... that is a theoretical ceiling of just over $9 billion on the second suit alone.”
musicbusinessworldwide.com/a…
ROSS retweeted
The Supreme Court has made it clear: copyright is NOT monopolization. Fair use is supposed to prevent that. The Third Circuit whent against that to protect Westlaw's monopoly. xitter.cf/shanedk/status/2106422…
Third Circuit opinion is BLATANT monopolization!
The Third Circuit in Thomson Reuters v. Ross went against DECADES of Supreme Court precedent to protect the Westlaw monopoly, the exact kind of monopolization fair use is supposed to prevent!
As I said in my video coverage of the ROSS decision, and the "creativity" of Thomson Reuters's headnotes:
They can't go injecting their own opinions and viewpoints into a legal opinion. They can't be expressive and still do their job. That would be misleading people about what the judicial opinion says.
Any creative spark would set a fire to someone depending on them for legal accuracy.
ROSS retweeted
god bless @shanedk
ROSS retweeted
This is how ridiculous the "creative spark" is!
As I said in my video coverage of the ROSS decision, and the "creativity" of Thomson Reuters's headnotes:
They can't go injecting their own opinions and viewpoints into a legal opinion. They can't be expressive and still do their job. That would be misleading people about what the judicial opinion says.
Any creative spark would set a fire to someone depending on them for legal accuracy.
ROSS retweeted
“An open video model is a ROSS. InterPositive is a ROSS with Hollywood lighting. Netflix, which owns the output, is a ROSS that paid $587 million for the privilege.”

































