Professor of Law, Tulane University School of Law

Algiers Point, LA
Joined October 2011
Brian L. Frye retweeted
Law folks: If you’re not using Claude Code or ChatGPT’s Codex, you have no idea what you’re missing. So I’m distributing my research tools that provide a huge boost to legal scholarship. Research assistance, cite-checking, proofreading, and more (thread): danepps.github.io/legal-rese…
21
48
7
447
60,056
I just posted @IpseDixitPod #842, featuring @mark_satta of @waynestate discussing his new book "Let Them Buy Cake: Gay Weddings and the Coordinated Campaign against Queer Rights." @OxUniPress shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/e…
1
1
494
I just posted @IpseDixitPod #841, featuring the Honorable Beverly B. Martin, a former 11th Circuit Judge, discussing her role in the Keep Our Republic Article III Coalition of former federal judges. shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/e…
1
3
605
Unreal. I bought & installed a new electric hot water heater from Home Depot & couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. After a week of pulling my hair out, I realized they wired it wrong at the factory, so I fixed it, but what the hell?!
6
1
35
1,806
For some additional manly news, I am now repairing the buttons on Maybell's dress.
1
11
326
lol what a tool. Also, Maybell sez his outfit looks like ass. & she’s right.
17
1
1
89
16,554
Brian L. Frye retweeted
Applications are now open for two new Anthropic Fellowships. STEM Fellows (science and engineering) and Conceptual Reasoning Fellows (philosophy, cognitive science, economics, policy, and law) will spend four months at Anthropic from January 2027, working to help Claude reason well about some of the hardest problems in those fields. For more information, see the descriptions below. The application deadline is October 28. Conceptual Reasoning Fellows: job-boards.greenhouse.io/ant… STEM Fellows: job-boards.greenhouse.io/ant…
383
558
179
6,815
1,311,048
Brian L. Frye retweeted
"Universities have just begun to enable scholars and students to contribute to the task of providing adequate knowledge to guide societal action on AI. This delay is eroding their capacity & legitimacy." via @techdirt w/ @brianlfrye, @robgreer1, Juliana Schroeder & Nate Fast
1
2
1
11
655
Time to teach intellectual property.
6
2
25
741
Teaching Jurisprudence at Cambridge for the very first time tomorrow! Cannot wait to get the students started on HLA Hart - and move beyond. If you want a flavour of what that’s like, here is a quiz I built last year with Claude. jurisprudence-quiz.netlify.a…
36
42
46
391
39,549
It has never been cheaper or easier in the history of humankind to find anything copy of anything you want to read. “Corporate media” is not to blame for our bad taste.
Everyone blames screens for the decline of reading. Nobody blames the consolidated corporate publishing industry that made books pricier, more generic, and harder to find. jacobin.com/2026/10/books-pu…
8
3
27
1,179
Drinking at Soon Enough bar, which has free costume checkout for Halloween.
4
32
889
You can spend ONE afternoon with: • Stan Brakhage • Maya Deren • Hollis Frampton • Marie Menken Who do you choose?
You can spend ONE afternoon with: • Gottlob Frege • Bertrand Russel • Ludwig Wittgenstein • W.V.O. Quine Who are you choosing?
1
1
2
702
The parasites are the copyright owners who want to collect a new category of rents.
I’m starting to get increasingly uncomfortable with the economics of AI as it is currently happening It seems fundamentally wrong that a small number of people with access to a huge amounts of VC money can vacuum up all the contributions of humanity, often paying nothing for it, then turn around and get enormously rich while the many people who put all the work into creating the training data get nothing I am generally pro-AI, but the way it is happening is seeming increasingly parasitic to me
2
2
18
1,603
I just posted @IpseDixitPod #840, featuring Aram Sinnreich of @AmericanU discussing his new book chapter "Music Sampling Law as Regulatory Vacuum and Check on Black Cultural Power" in the Oxford Handbook on Sampling in Popular Music from @OUPAcademic. shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/e…
10
582
A lot of "classic" literature didn't age all that well & there is plenty of great contemporary writing, although it often has few readers. Most people have bad taste, news at 11?
We don't have a reading crisis. A lot of people are still reading, but they tend to read romantasy porn or self-help books—or, perhaps, Sally Rooney novels. What we have, my friends, is a seriousness crisis. There is, indeed, a difference between reading profound classic literature and reading contemporary slop, and it’s time we admitted it.
2
2
13
1,065
Amen. But I fear it will take much longer. Incumbents don't relinquish their sinecures readily.
Prediction: no one will care about journal names in 5 years.
1
2
10
1,106
Ironically, the problem with this paper is that the authors don’t realize that they aren’t identifying ideas, but generic content.
Can you tell if the ideas in a piece of writing are from a human or an AI? As AI writing becomes more commonplace, emerging policies on AI use increasingly focus on who came up with the ideas in the text rather than who wrote the text. Modern AI detectors such as Pangram answer the latter question but not the former. Introducing IdeaLens, a detector of AI ideas!
2
1
9
1,593
I assume this is serious, but it would be an amazing troll. In any case, the plagiarism police should be delighted, or maybe horrified? Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it.
Replying to @rishanthrajendh
We represent documents as outlines of their ideas. Starting from 1M web-scale documents with prose authorship labels from Pangram 3, we construct WildOutlines, a paired corpus of documents and their outlines. We train IdeaLens on these outlines after paraphrasing to fit the Pangram labels. Paraphrasing removes any remnant stylistic cues from the source document forcing IdeaLens to focus on the underlying ideas and not surface-form. As a control, we also train ProseLens with the same backbone but on the raw document texts.
2
1
7
788