Pinned Tweet
What is the first thing you should do when starting a new PostgreSQL project that will save you countless headaches?
filip-prochazka.com/blog/new…
Filip Procházka retweeted
> it is very very likely that fable is better than you in every branch of software
It is faster than me. It is cheaper than me. It knows way more trick than I do. It also indeed knows every codebase that is out there.
But for some reason, it's dogshit at actual engineering. Tries to cheat its way through problems instead of fixing them constantly. Completely fails to produce sensible abstractions. The test suite it produces are both enormous and somehow misses the behavior you care about while being tightly coupled to the implementation.
I wish it could do these things for me, but it can't today, and doesn't show much signs of improving.
I think people saying this are either doing it for the views, or because they are the ones who produced the mountain of shit software we ase dealing with are are indeed worse than fable in every way.
Not something I'd brag about.
the coding agent haters are getting dunning-kruger'd so hard right now
do you really think that your engineering ability is better than the models at this point?
it is very very likely that fable is better than you in every branch of software
it has been trained on all the code of the internet, it knows almost every trick in the book, all the design patterns of every domain, every single low-level detail, every bit-twiddling hack, it's read every single blog post from every cracked engineer that ever existed
do you really think you can beat it? do you really think you can be more creative than it?
unless you are 99th percentile expert in some niche domain of software, it simply is not possible. sorry.
Filip Procházka retweeted
>it has been trained on all the code of the internet
That's how I know I'm better.
the coding agent haters are getting dunning-kruger'd so hard right now
do you really think that your engineering ability is better than the models at this point?
it is very very likely that fable is better than you in every branch of software
it has been trained on all the code of the internet, it knows almost every trick in the book, all the design patterns of every domain, every single low-level detail, every bit-twiddling hack, it's read every single blog post from every cracked engineer that ever existed
do you really think you can beat it? do you really think you can be more creative than it?
unless you are 99th percentile expert in some niche domain of software, it simply is not possible. sorry.
Filip Procházka retweeted
HOLY SHIT.
For crypto, this is one of the most insane posts of the year, but I'm guessing most people don't understand it.
Let me explain...
Bitcoin's accounts, and subsequently Ethereum's (and therefore every other EVM chain's), are built on a specific elliptic curve called secp256k1.
secp256k1 is a different elliptic curve from the one used across nearly every modern hardware device, including iPhones.
Modern devices mostly use a different curve called secp256r1, which is usually referred to as P-256 - one of the curves investigated in the article.
This mismatch has made it sooo difficult in the past to integrate crypto accounts natively into the security systems of modern hardware.
For example, Apple's Secure Enclave natively supports P-256, not secp256k1.
This has prevented crypto accounts from being able to use the same hardware protection as things like Apple Pay.
Same goes for the web with passkeys - WebAuthn uses P-256 signatures, which means Ethereum accounts using secp256k1 can't use them natively either.
But why did Satoshi do this?
The main theory for choosing secp256k1 was distrust of the P-256 curve - i.e. he thought there was an NSA backdoor.
A "backdoor" here basically means a secret, intentional weakness in the curve that would allow the NSA to exploit it and access private keys.
This was because P-256 was created with involvement from the NSA...
And the NSA provided a mysterious "seed" used to generate one of the curve's parameters without explaining where that seed came from.
This eventually transformed into a ~25-year-old mystery with a 5-figure reward for finding where this seed came from.
Claude figured it out in less than 30 mins.
And the best part is its internal thinking was: "Hmm wait... is it suspicious that such an obvious thing wasn’t discovered in 25 years?"
The solution was stupidly simple - just the time the curve was created, put into a specific random number generator function.
This doesn't 100% prove there's no backdoor yet, but it provides strong evidence that this seed wasn't secretly engineered by the NSA.
And Claude did this with "just a simple prompt" in under 30 minutes.
CLAUDE FOUND THE SEEDS
anthropic.com/research/ecdsa…
I still feel this, but I also feel like my ceiling has rised a lot since a year ago. I feel like my brain is rewiring itself to cope woth this new kind of workload.
AI was supposed to make us work less
I've never been this tired in my life
most days I have up to 10 agents running at the same time. one fixing a bug, one writing pages, one refactoring something I already forgot I asked for, 3 other I have no idea what they are doing but i suppose i ask it?
and I jump from conversation to conversation all day
compared to 5 years ago, I probably context switch 100x more
by the end of the day my brain is fried. completely toasted. nothing left, not even for the people I love
I call it the fried brain effect
thought it was just me but almost every founder I talk to lately says the exact same thing
we got superpowers, and somehow the pressure only went up. if you can ship 10x more, you feel like you have to ship 10x more. every single day
I don't have a solution
honestly I have no idea where this goes from here
anyone else feeling this?
Filip Procházka retweeted
All this reverse engineering and cracking of software/video games because of AI has me very worried and I believe will lead to fewer freedoms, not more.
Companies now have zero incentive to ship you a binary without extreme DRM and hardware level anti-consumer sniffers and telemetry.
Reverse engineering copyright was always a very grey area because of how difficult and painstaking it was. Now with AI, one person can crack a game in weeks, not years and years needing a whole team.
This will likely lead to companies justifying ending client based software delivery in favor of streaming based cloud services and games.
At its very worst, consumer hardware and GPUs with local AI may get classified as “pirating machines” that become difficult or illegal to own because of how copyright and ownership laws get re-written around AI.
It’s not “you will own nothing and be happy” it’s “you will stream everything off a server and be complacent”.
Filip Procházka retweeted
According to Cloudflare Data Explorer the amount of russian bot traffic has dropped to 49% after Ukraine struck a yandex data center. Could this disrupt the midterm elections in the US?
Filip Procházka retweeted
"your edge right now is understanding the possibilities and being curious"
Using AI for software engineering is now the default. The engineers I've seen who have the edge are ambitious and have been grinding with agents for years on the job at this point. It's a compounding effect.
For teams still unsure or catching up, the smartest thing I can advise is to be even more ambitious and aggressively share what you learn with your peers. If you do all this work privately, only you benefit. If your team only gets to experiment with AI after hours, you've quietly told them using it doesn't count.
Senior engineers should be the first to make this shift. Their decades of taste in system design and failure modes is the secret sauce that makes agent output good. They should direct their experience to building with agents better safety. Then show whats working to others to replicate.
🗞️ if your team is too busy doing their 'normal job' to experiment with AI, you're preparing them to be replaced
ghuntley.com/replaced/
In this post, I guess this's the last time I'll say it. AI use is no longer optional if you wish to be employed. What follows is advice for current employees and hiring managers on how to hire in 2026 to source AI-first candidates.
Filip Procházka retweeted
A framework is an intelligence cache.
You could waste tokens reinventing the ORM, cache, queues, auth, routing, etc, or you could just pick a world-class framework.
Makes you wonder what poor smuck with no morals was broke enough to comply with such stupid requirements from their morally broken boss to add this dark pattern of preventing people from closing an account...
Filip Procházka retweeted
Google just ruined OpenAI's dev day lmao
Gemini 4 Pro leaks absolutely dominates both Anthropic and OpenAI
This means Fable 5.5 and GPT 6.1 has to price match Gemini 4 Pro now IPO DELAYED 🤣
Filip Procházka retweeted
Oh come on. Quick look at colorshift (13x faster): HashMap in hot loop (unoptimized Rust vibeslop) is slower than indexed arrays (ASM). No shit. Numbers like 17x should raise eyebrows but reading the comments nobody is thinking anymore. This AI psychosis has fried people's brains
I ported the Omarchy screensaver engine (ttfx) from Rust to x86-64 assembler, and it's up to 17x faster!! One-shot translation by Opus 5.5. We keep drilling until the agentic drill bit hits bedrock! github.com/omacom/ttfx/pull/…
Filip Procházka retweeted
the moat is literally just caring about your work and being proud of your output and holy shit it does not seem to apply to 99% of people
Filip Procházka retweeted
There’s a viral post going around from a programmer saying AI coding has made his job soul-sucking because everyone is being pushed to ship more and more without really understanding anything.
I keep thinking that sounds less like an AI problem and more like a management problem😂
Filip Procházka retweeted
Why are there no anti-slop coding evals?
Ok sure Claude scored 70% on frontierSWE or whatever. But it also added 100 bullshit tests that no engineer in their right mind would keep. Fails code review. I need to check it now. If a human has to review & clean up that’s a fail score






































