Est 🇪🇪 Professor in media and communication Malmö University🇸🇪, interested in media, museums, internet studies, society, life-in-academia.

Sweden
Joined July 2010
raa.se/omvarld-och-insikt/pi… Museums live in a data loopand have to cope with monsters. In the autumn, I spoke of monsters, data and museums. The site is in Swedish, but the talk was in English.
1
102
I remember asking, when I was a govmt adviser on archives, how we were planning to make digital archives survive future software and hardware changes. No answer. There's just an assumption that 'the future' will always know how to access Word files. Crazy.
58
240
10
2,065
87,570
Walter Benjamin's rules for writing
16
652
73
4,038
399,843
I'm serious. STEM without the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities will produce more "innovative" tech bros who giddily reinvent rent, roommates, taxes, and now...roller skates. With complete, straight-faced, sincerity. This is a problem. And I have a list (So, thread 🧵)
These new AI shoes can make you walk 250% faster. Moonwalkers use AI to learn your step gait/speed and adapt to you. The shoe has two modes: lock, and shift, and will only work when you move.
180
6,744
600
30,809
4,429,872
porslinsravsmuseum.se/ presents itself. What happens when one creates artistic project which is satire of a museum. Amazing idea that we did not know we needed. 🦊🦊🦊
4
62
It is not every day one can brag about having written something in a language one can hardly read. Two chapters in Norwegian about our experiments with museum things that have lost their stories and how to use digital space to talk about things.
1
3
408
If you liked this thread: 1. Follow me @DrAminaYonis for more academic writing content 2. RT the tweet below to share this thread
Stop using ChatGPT or Quillbot to perfect your academic writing. These platforms are not designed for academics. Instead, use Trinka which is a free AI-powered app.
9
43
30,431
PillePV retweeted
We scrapped our #Museum capital project. - it was taking ages to deliver - seemed complicated - and we’ve only demolished a few houses Under our new plan ‘keeping things in other people’s lofts’ we won’t build anything or collect stuff. Just leave it scattered about ! 🧵👇
1
7
1
39
2,474
PillePV retweeted
Our Flexible Grants for Small Groups - offering up to €8,100/£7,000 for small groups of scholars working across the #socialsciences & #humanities- is now open for applicants. Share widely! Deadline 5pm BST, 30th November 2023. More Information here👉isrf.org/funding-opportuniti…
1
92
1
144
39,115
Utrecht University @UniUtrecht in the Netherlands has withdrawn itself from the World University ranking @THEworldunirank provided by @timeshighered. As this has generated quite some reactions - praise, questions, some doubts, I want to provide some context. Hence a thread 🧵1/16
56
1,280
465
3,305
1,122,766
Yesterday I was at @ulusofonaporto for the workshop on #DataReflexivity at the @ECREA_eu conference. Thanks to the organizers @PillePV @MartinaMahnke @joelleswart and David Mathieu. It was really nice being together and sharing ideas @annettemarkham on such a poignant topic!
1
1
4
362
Consider our #OpenAcess chapter on #museum #makerspaces aimed at children (& parents) #DigitalParenting
1
4
11
1,909
🥁GIF IT UP will return this October with new collections to explore🔍animation tutorials to follow online and in-person, a new partner and a special prize category. Save the date📅, spread the word📢check out entries from previous editions📺➡️giphy.com/gifitup #GIFITUP2023
19
7
61
9,520
📢📢📢 **CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS** conference+edited volume Contested Monuments with Paul Basu and @sophialabadi Please see details, including conveners' emails, below. #conference #book
24
35
6,584
I JUST SUBMITTED MY DISSERTATION!
30
17
4
404
37,193
REPORT LAUNCH: 'Risking Lives: Smart Borders, Private Interests and AI Policy in Europe' from the DATAJUSTICE project. Read it here: datajusticeproject.net/wp-co…
1
36
1
96
14,475
Did you know that the References are the part of a paper most often overlooked? 😳 It's not only damaging science but also making desk-rejection more likely. Here's a 9-point references checklist for you to bookmark! A thread. 🧵 #PostDoc #newPI #PIchat — ✅1: Did you read every study you are referencing? Make sure that the studies you cite are actually substantiating your statements in the manuscript. — ✅2: Are you always citing primary sources to support specific claims? It's okay to cite reviews for more broader statements but when you are referring to a specific finding, always cite the paper that reported it first. — ✅3: Is every study you cite needed to understand the context of your paper? Make sure you aren't turning your research paper into a textbook or review paper and stay hyper-focused on what's needed exactly to understand your results. — ✅4: Is your bibliography free of citation bias? We may tend to (sometimes subconsciously!) preferentially cite friends or studies in our own geographical area. Do a double-check to find literature you may have overlooked. — ✅5: Are you also citing the studies that disagree with your findings? Giving the full picture is honest and doesn't discredit your findings -- quite the opposite: your readers will trust you more! — ✅6: Are you citing your own work? Self-citation is necessary when you have done research on the topic before -- within reason, of course. Use the active voice ("we found...") when referring to your previous work so your authority in the field doesn't get buried. — ✅7: When referring to other studies, do you always describe the finding instead of only the authors' aim and approach? Don't make the reader do the work for you. We want to know what the authors discovered (that is relevant to your own study), not what they set out to do! — ✅8: Do you present the cited studies critically? It’s so easy to create and spread scientific myths. So, don't distort hypotheses or not yet reproduced findings into facts. And if you don't agree with an author's conclusion, do comment on it. — ✅9: Have you double-checked the accuracy of your references list? Make sure your references don’t have errors and adhere to the journal guidelines. If permitted, it'll be helpful for the reader to include the cited paper's title, DOI and link. — TL;DR: A checklist for your References: ✔️Read every cited study ✔️Cite primary sources ✔️Cite essential papers only ✔️Avoid citation bias ✔️Give the whole picture ✔️Cite own work transparently ✔️Describe studies' findings ✔️Present studies critically ✔️Double-check accuracy
11
197
19
694
177,626
A thread on an issue that was missing from the previous thread, and that needs to be addressed: grantmanship, and how it blatantly wastes public research money (1/9)
7
34
5
100
Stop funding research (the way you do) Because it is wasteful, unethical and unscientific A thread (1/16)
161
3,058
1,164
8,946