LADIES & GENTLEMEN, IRENE ADUBA WHO TOOK ICHAFU TO THE BIGGEST BEAUTY SHOW IN AFRICA HAS JUST BEEN BULLIED. BUT WE GOT THIS. I need you to read the absolute rubbish the imbecile who sent her this message has concocted. What I’m sharing below is only a tiny part of the lengthy crap she sent Irene. She even cited copyright laws. Read: 10. Request for correction of the Instagram posts and clarification regarding the exhibition video In light of the historical evidence outlined above, I ask that you correct all Instagram posts under your control that present Gele as Ichafu, including posts that label, caption or describe the elaborate Gele form as Ichafu. Where the attribution is incorrect, it should be corrected clearly so that viewers are not left with the impression that the documented Yoruba Gele form originated independently as an indigenous Igbo headgear called Ichafu. This correction should apply to all relevant posts, not just future publications. I also ask you to confirm whether the exhibition banner and video that began circulating on X on Sunday, 11 October 2026, in connection with the Ichafu Exhibition and Beauty in the Motherland 2026, and branded “Ichafu by Ireneartistry,” belong to you or your business, or were created, commissioned, authorised or published by you. If the video or exhibition materials are yours, or were published or authorised by you, will you correct the attribution of the Gele shown in them as well? Please clarify what steps you intend to take to ensure that the public-facing exhibition materials accurately distinguish the documented Yoruba Gele form from indigenous Igbo head-tie traditions. I am raising these matters because cultural inclusion should not come at the expense of historical accuracy. Acknowledging indigenous Igbo headgear and its proper name does not require attributing a documented Yoruba form to a different origin without evidence. Conclusion and formal request for corrective action The historical evidence presented in this letter warrants a clear distinction between indigenous Igbo head-tie traditions and the elaborate Yoruba Gele form at issue. Recognising and celebrating Igbo cultural heritage does not justify attributing a documented Yoruba form to a separate origin without adequate historical evidence. I therefore formally request that you take the following actions: 1. Instagram publications: Correct every relevant post under your control by accurately labelling the head-tie as Gele, or remove the post where the attribution cannot be corrected. 2. Exhibition materials: Confirm whether the exhibition banner and video circulating on X were created, commissioned, authorised or published by you or your business. If they were, issue a clear public correction and contact the account circulating the video to request that the attribution be corrected or the material removed. 3. Historical basis: Identify the historical sources supporting your claim that the specific elaborate head-tie form in question originated independently as Ichafu. Please provide a written response within 14 days of receiving this letter, addressing each request individually. I have raised this matter because cultural heritage deserves accurate identification, responsible representation and respect for the historical record. The existence of indigenous Igbo headgear is not in dispute; the issue is the attribution of this particular form. That distinction should be reflected in the material you publish and in any exhibition content for which you are responsible. I expect this matter to be addressed substantively, rather than through a general assertion of cultural inclusion that does not answer the historical evidence presented. If the attribution is maintained, I ask that the historical basis for doing so be clearly identified and made available for scrutiny. I hope you will treat this request seriously and take the necessary corrective action to ensure that the public record is accurate.