Alexander Garcia retweeted
Tesla via their new Annual Report that was released today:
“Readied V3 Optimus for mass production” 👀
Alexander Garcia retweeted
I am rooting against Elon Musk because I hate America's children and don't want them to have a good life
Alexander Garcia retweeted
난 로드스터의 제로백 영상 보고 "아니, 0-60mph(마일) 측정하는데 트랙이 왜 이렇게 짧아?'라고 생각했음
근데 이유가 있었음
로드스터는 0.81초 만에 60mph(96.56km/h)에 도달했는데 차가 너무 빨라서 트랙 10.9m 면 충분했던 것이었음! 😱😱
*0-60mph 측정 시 필요 트랙 거리 1초: 13.4m / 2초: 26.8m / 3초: 40.2m / 4초: 53.6m / 5초: 67.1m
(이스터 에그)
그리고 뒷바퀴가 돌아가면 즉시 통과 벽 우측 상단에 바나나가 떨어지게 세팅해 놓았는데,
바나나가 자유낙하(35km/h)로 떨어지면 정확히 1초 뒤 바닥에 닿게 높이(4.9m)에 위치시켜 놓음
그런데 로드스터는 바나나가 땅에 닿기도 전에 60마일의 속도로 벽을 통과함 (0.81초)
알고 보니까 더 재밌네!!
Alexander Garcia retweeted
Replying to @MattWalshBlog
Luddism 101.
Take one of the most transformative innovations in human history, ignore the enormous benefits it has delivered, selectively identify its negative consequences, and declare that the people who opposed it were right about everything.
By that standard, we should still be debating whether the printing press was a mistake.
There's something remarkably arrogant about enjoying the fruits of human ingenuity while treating the ingenuity itself as a regrettable development.
Civilization didn't advance because people surrendered to their fears of progress. It advanced because others refused to.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
Replying to @MattWalshBlog
I wonder, Matt, do you use:
A record player or Spotify?
Encyclopedias or Google?
Paper maps or Google Maps?
A phone book or online directories?
A newspaper or online news?
A dictionary or online definitions?
A fax machine or email?
Postage stamps or instant messaging?
A landline or internet calling?
A VHS collection or Netflix?
A television guide or online schedules?
A radio broadcast or podcasts?
A physical calendar or Google Calendar?
A filing cabinet or cloud storage?
A bank teller or online banking?
A checkbook or electronic payments?
A stockbroker or online investing?
Newspaper classifieds or online marketplaces?
A printed catalog or Amazon?
An airline timetable or live flight tracking?
A hotel brochure or online reviews?
A weather almanac or live forecasts?
An instruction manual or YouTube tutorials?
A medical encyclopedia or online medical resources?
A newspaper job listing or LinkedIn?
A ticket booth or online ticketing?
A newspaper archive or searchable digital archives?
A translation dictionary or instant translation?
A recipe book or millions of searchable recipes?
A television network's permission or direct access to millions of viewers?
And Matt, would you rather distribute your opinions through pamphlets on street corners or broadcast them instantly to millions through the very technology you're condemning?
The internet has problems. So does every transformative technology.
But declaring its critics right about literally everything while enjoying its extraordinary benefits is a spectacular exercise in taking progress for granted.
You aren't demonstrating that the internet was a mistake.
You're demonstrating how comfortable people can become with miracles they no longer recognize.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
France has FREE health care, paid parental leave, paid family leave, FREE child care, FREE preschool, 5 weeks paid vacation, a 35 hour work week, generous unemployment and housing benefits, and heavily subsidized higher education.
Everything the left says they want AND THEY'RE STILL PROTESTING AND BURNING SHIT DOWN.
Because trains don't drop you off and pick up you at your doorsteps, take you shopping, to get a cup of coffee, to the vet, doctor's appointment, or all the 99% of things humans do without a train.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Alexander Garcia retweeted
IN THE NEWS TWO YEARS AGO
(If you get your news from Zack Nelson)
“[Cybercab] is *less* likely to exist than Roadster”
Alexander Garcia retweeted
Your Tesla can now activate self-driving mode when you’re driving manually if it detects you’re about to crash, not paying attention, have fallen asleep, are having a medical emergency, etc.
I would not want someone I love driving any other brand.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
Personal excellence is the skeleton key for having an outsized positive impact on people's lives. This is the legacy of capitalism...not only does it drive innovation & inspire development, but it provides the opportunity to cut out corrupt government and give big, directly.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
SpaceX is on track for 1.22–1.44M GPUs, about 2.3–2.7 GW of compute by end of year. A year ago, nobody could remotely imagine a rocket company would be one of the largest AI compute owners on Earth.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
It’s about political control. When he was voting for their team, he was the second coming of Jesus. A liberal businessman who was doing things the right way.
Then suddenly after Democrats started targeting him for being too successful, he’s completely useless and it’s just a lucky coincidence that all his companies are wildly successful. Certainly it doesn’t have anything to do with him, it was probably thanks to Martin Eberhard or something.
The reason their opinion flipped 180 is that they want to control you. They want their guys in charge. And if you ever started to doubt their plans for the country, or expressed that you wanted something different, they would do the exact same thing to you.
If they were willing to set America’s clean energy transition back for political power, they’ll destroy you without even blinking.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
Replying to @joesegal
You're explicitly advocating parasitism through authoritarianism while calling the people whose wealth you want to confiscate parasites.
You demand the fruits of their productivity, claim the authority to seize them, and celebrate their inability to escape your demands.
It's an attempt to claim moral virtue through theft and discrimination, with the added irony of condemning as parasites the very people you intend to live off.
Alexander Garcia retweeted
Dear European countries: It's not a dunk on Elon/SpaceX/US that you're just now going to try to start providing your own basic internal government communications services. You should've been doing that all along.
The fact that you're just waking up to this fact now is a self-own, not a "devastating blow" to Starlink.
Replying to @TMFAssociates
I agree that these governments will be able to gradually claw back some of their dependency on Starlink. That's quite a low bar. "Hey maybe as a sovereign nation, you should be able to provide all of your own secure governmental communications services." They don't get a gold star and a cookie just for managing to provide their own basic internal government services.
But the way this conversation is being presented (from what I've seen) is that this is some kind of huge impact on Starlink. "Devastating" and such. When the reality is that these other constellations will have negligible impact on Starlink commercially.
The car industry had a century to build an electric car people actually wanted. It didn’t.
The aerospace industry had sixty years to make a rocket reusable. It didn’t.
The telecom industry had decades to connect the billions it couldn’t profit from. It didn’t.
One person looked at all three and started crossing them off.
Reusable rockets that land themselves. Electric cars that outsell their gas-powered rivals. A satellite network that beams internet from orbit to any point on the planet. A platform where speech is no longer filtered through a handful of editors. A chip inside a human brain that lets a paralyzed person control a computer with their thoughts.
And now a car that flies.
Six companies. Six industries. Each one operating at the frontier of its field while feeding engineering, data, and capability back into the others.
The rockets fund the satellites. The satellites fund the rockets. The cars train the robots. The AI runs them. The platform keeps the conversation free. The energy powers all of it.
People keep waiting for him to fail. They have been waiting for twenty years.
The rockets were supposed to explode. They land on boats. The cars were supposed to be toys. They outsell everyone. The satellites were supposed to be impossible. They connect six continents.
The brain chip was supposed to be science fiction. It is inside a human skull right now.
At some point the pattern stops being luck and starts being something the critics are not equipped to recognize.
Not because they lack intelligence. Because the framework they use to judge what is possible was built inside the institutions that couldn’t do what he does.
The conversation about Elon Musk has never been about Elon Musk.
It has been about how uncomfortable it makes people to watch one person accomplish what entire industries organized themselves to attempt and never finished.
History does not produce this combination often. The drive. The technical depth. The pain tolerance. The willingness to let the mission burn through everything else. And the insane ambition to attempt all of it at once.
Every one of these technologies would have arrived eventually. Reusable rockets. Electric vehicles. Global connectivity. Brain interfaces. None of them violated the laws of physics.
But eventually can mean fifty years. And fifty years is the difference between your grandchildren seeing it and you seeing it.
The most overlooked thing Musk has done is not any single invention.
It is how much of the future he pulled into the lifetimes of people who would have died before it arrived.
Earth does not get many of these.
And the people still betting against him are making the same mistake every industry made before he walked in and did the thing they said couldn’t be done.
























