Replying to @njmcook
A search for the truth? Vulnerability to corruption?
Replying to @njmcook
Oh well, no apology needed, was just interested which was around you meant the statement… but yes indeed, science and faith are uneasy companions!
And on it goes… 🤦♀️
Another generation lied to, indoctrinated and psychologically interfered with by radicals and fools.
Parents must enquire, speak up and reject this on mass.
Schooling is our public service, paid for by us, to educate our children, according to our consciences and to an impartial standard, based on facts.
It’s time the captured teaching profession, education authorities and our Govt were made to understand that.
Yesterday my son sat through a class where his teacher told him some people were born in the wrong body so they were the opposite sex or had no sex at all. I wasn’t informed this was part of the school curriculum (although I know it is). In the recent past parents were required to give permission for an adult, often outsourced non teaching staff, to speak to minor children about adult concepts like sexuality and gender identity. This is no longer the case. It is now up to us parents to know what our kids are being taught and by whom. Often kids are scared to tell because they know their parents, or any other reasonable adult, would be horrified and they are afraid of their parent making a scene. We need to reassure those kids that won’t happen so they don’t carry any confusion or anxiety they might be feeling about what they were being taught.
Replying to @njmcook
Well, yes… but then it depends what you mean by ‘science’, and who is in control of what it means.
Well this is very heartening.
But I hope @Nigel_Farage knows what this promise means… the sheer quantity and scale of legislative changes that stopping gender ideology will entail, plus the full scale war with the teaching unions that will ensue. Not to mention the international legal frameworks, tech industries and commercial forces that want Transhumanist ideology to pervade the globe.
🤞
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons retweeted
Replying to @IanCour70323568
Thanks Ian. I truly take no pleasure in being adversarial in saying these things. I just think someone has to try and change the tone from behind-the-curve lamentation to effective, front foot opposition.
I believe feminism - for all its professed militancy - is still characterised by the amenable nature of women and their tendency to create and police in-group narratives, use discussion and covert means to gradually alter the actions and politics of men, and lacks the instinct to take drastic measures and really finish off an enemy.
This can be effective on slow baked, progressive reform by consensus, but it is utterly useless in the face of a serious, malevolent enemy. Which is what we are facing.
Replying to @ayeshadequeiroz
Yes. She and quite a few others set the hare running in the wrong direction. And everyone chased ‘single sex spaces’ instead of Transhumanism and child abuse - and the legal frameworks and cultural capture that enable it.
Replying to @KevsTribulation @Nigel_Farage
Well said.
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons retweeted
It's nice of @Nigel_Farage to post support on Facebook for my case.
However, many of the comments are extraordinary. People are pontificating with no knowledge of the facts and relying on their ideological prejudices. That's the down side of social media.
In a nutshell, the facts are:
I was fired for not following New College Swindon's Gender Reassignment Policy.
Because I didn't follow this and did not submit to compelled speech I was accused of bullying and harassing Student A.
I was never given an instruction to follow the Gender Reassignment Policy by the college. That instruction came from another student, Student B.
I raised safeguarding concerns that were never properly considered because of the transgender affirmative philosophy of the college.
The Employment Tribunal never considered the issue or the legality of the policy - quite the reverse, they said it was not their concern.
The basis of my appeal is that the policy was illegal by demanding compliance to compelled speech and this fundamental issue was ignored by the Employment Tribunal, and so was an error in law.
Finally, it is important to child safeguarding that Labour lose the next election, and a government is formed that prohibits transgender indoctrination in schools, be that Conservative, Reform or Restore.
Thank you @Nigel_Farage for being explicit on this.
m.facebook.com/story.php?sto…
Replying to @cadillac_green
And puppets. A proving ground. A once moral, cultural leader that can be manipulated to assist desired narratives on the global stage. The famous heart of liberty and democracy that must be controlled and instrumentalised for narrative control.
Replying to @cadillac_green
Yes, it’s true, we have a leading life sciences industry that plays its part.
Replying to @IanCour70323568
Thanks Ian. I truly take no pleasure in being adversarial in saying these things. I just think someone has to try and change the tone from behind-the-curve lamentation to effective, front foot opposition.
I believe feminism - for all its professed militancy - is still characterised by the amenable nature of women and their tendency to create and police in-group narratives, use discussion and covert means to gradually alter the actions and politics of men, and lacks the instinct to take drastic measures and really finish off an enemy.
This can be effective on slow baked, progressive reform by consensus, but it is utterly useless in the face of a serious, malevolent enemy. Which is what we are facing.
British liberal elites have no idea what they’re doing with trans ideology.
They’re like foolish children wandering around a fireworks factory with a box of matches…
‘Shall we teach the gender bread diagram in schools? Shall we fund mastectomies for 18 year olds on the NHS? Shall we set up clinical trials to block healthy children’s puberty? We just want to be nice and look after everyone’s rights, you see… so we better criminalise parents who dissent…’
‘And how about liberalising surrogacy… why can’t a single man buy a baby, it’s only fair and equal? Perhaps artificial wombs and genetic engineering are the answer to an aging population and the unfair burden on women to procreate? Anyway, men can have children too, you know….’
Barely any of the people engaged in these topics have any idea what they’re truly dealing with - including those who are skeptical of them - because the technological and ideological vanguard is in the US and the propaganda and legal frameworks that have been swaying our country are international.
We cannot keep operating with this level of blindness, otherwise our once admirable country is going to be used as the supposedly credible testing ground for atrocities.
Humanity cannot safely be transposed and made interchangeable with machinery, we cannot swap and change our sex with mutilating surgeries and hormones, nor can babies be mass produced or motherhood bypassed without disastrous consequences. And fusing human soldiers with machines is a terrifying prospect…
Transhumanism - especially its utopian, Sci-fi fallacies - is a frontier that requires urgent ethical attention.
And we should be considering that high functioning autism is not only a technical super power, but a risk factor for inhumane decision making - in surgery, law, defence and so on. As is narcissism, or other personality disorders and perversions in high functioning men.
It is a legal, legislative and constitutional scandal too.
Why do the GC lawyers never tell us that though…?
Gender laws did this.
Dennis Noel Kavanagh@Jebadoo2Oct 24🇬🇧
United KingdomConnected via United Kingdom App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
78 young people harmed by the NHS because managers would rather harass Dr Redvers out of a job than deal with the Wild West of gender medicine. Dr Redvers is right to call this a medical scandal.
That this was not presented as a case of psychological child abuse that requires a complete overhaul of safeguarding, rather than an excuse for further medical abuse is a mini atrocity.
And let us not forget that the proposed Conversion Practices Ban will criminalise those who stand against this kind of psychological abuse, so that ‘child gender medicine’ can continue unopposed.
I honestly cannot put into words how dark this situation is.
"they are typically young people who have been socially transitioned since early childhood, and after 18 months of therapy, they still have absolutely no sense or concept of living in their biological gender" - Cass.
What is the answer for these damaged children? What's happened to them is a total societal failure in child safeguarding. That we even have to consider stopping their puberty as a potential next step just shows how low we've sunk.
1/
hansard.parliament.uk/lords/…
Replying to @afneil
Staggering naivety from a seasoned newsman.
Replying to @untoxiccon83503
Indeed. Fat chance. And this is one of the many reasons the Tories, no matter how competent and improved they might claim to be, cannot be allowed near power again. When you have got things so badly wrong that you oversaw, funded medical child abuse, you cannot afford to fully address your mistakes. They are just too bad.
Same goes with the Boris wave, the Covid totalitarianism, the climate/energy mismanagement etc. There is no way back, as every grandee of your party is implicated somehow.
So… if C4W were to do more than just lament about this horror show, would they agree that:
- Cass was always dangerously wrong and has green lighted a Mengele-grade atrocity that should have been vigorously opposed from the minute her report was published?
- Tory govts should never have put the Equality Act 2010 into law with the PC of Gender Reassignment in place, because it recklessly frames children as potential ‘Transexuals’ from birth, leading to abusive ‘transition’ in public services?
- Tory Ministers turbo charged the social contagion of ‘trans’ ideology in schools and let it capture medicine in a way that should be considered abject negligence?
- Tories wrongly tried to engage with or control the EHRC and Ofsted to slowly correct this, when in fact these anti-democratic socialist quangos shouldn’t exist and ought to have been shut, in concert with withdrawing from the corrupted ECHR - something that was implicitly mandated by the Brexit vote?
- Conservative activists were too swayed by liberal women’s rights campaigners aiming for incremental gains for single sex services and balancing children’s safety with ‘trans rights’, and didn’t listen closely enough to ‘ultras’, parents and safeguarding experts who understood and warned about the full danger of gender laws and the radical pushers of trans ideology?
Because, only when we tell the truth openly about the catastrophic mistakes the liberal Tories made, can we realise that the solutions must be a complete break with the past. Especially if we are to avoid the totalitarian nature of the proposed Conversion Practices Act.
If the Conservatives ever come to power again, this situation requires hardline policy, fiercely defended boundaries in public services, new prohibitions and criminal sanctions to guarantee safeguarding, an inquiry to expose fault and urgent repeal of gender laws.
Is this what @CforWomenUK will be asking @KemiBadenoch to deliver?
Because I know many parents will vote for nothing less.
Conservatives for Women@CforWomenUKOct 23🇬🇧
United KingdomConnected via United Kingdom App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Extraordinary testimony from Baroness Cass yesterday on the profile of children who will be part of the *Puberty Blockers Trial*. Little kids who have been 'socially transitioned' from early childhood. Harmed by their parents - reinforced by the State... @Transgendertrd 1/






