
building @polynetai & @distribution.engineer
Joined December 2022
- Tweets11.6K
- Following2.3K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes28.1K
I always thought this was obvious but many people still think humans must interpolate the outcomes of AI systems
I find that funny because the next generation of models will always be so much smarter
Neil retweeted
The era of faceless social media accounts is over.
No one is buying from a p*ssy who is too scared to show their face. People now buy from people because of AI and plummeting trust.
Welcome to the more human future.
Absolute personal brand dominance.
Neil retweeted
Underrated life advice: The wise choice is rarely the exciting one. Protecting the empire is boring. That's exactly why most people ignore it and end up rebuilding from the start.
Was daily driving Opus 5.5 for a while, went back to 6.1 sol and it's just sooo much better at complex system engineering
Opus is still sloppy
LFG
JUST IN: NASA says its Moon Base is running ahead of schedule, with the first element now expected to launch in December followed by near-monthly robotic missions to the lunar surface beginning in early 2027.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said the agency expects to beat the original national-space-policy target of putting the first Moon Base elements in place by 2030.
The plan is to send infrastructure, rovers and other equipment ahead of astronauts so hardware is already operating on the surface when crews arrive.
NASA is also developing a public website that will allow people to follow construction of the lunar base as missions arrive.
“We’re leaving no doubts this time,” Isaacman said. “It’s all in HD.”
for all of the devs who sell to other devs, just remember this.
"what is simple in one arena, is often profound in another."
tldr sell to literally anyone else and you'll be rich
"Oh no!!
I used the most powerful technology in the history of humanity!
I watched it for a whole 30 minutes, slowly eating my plan limit and I never decided to stop it.
Now my limits are gone.
Woe is me 😭😭"
I ran out of my entire weekly limit on the $500 ChatGPT Pro Max plan in under 30 minutes.
GPT 6 Astra Ultrafast.
0% left until October 6.
OpenAI just scammed everybody.
DevDay is ass so far...
The death of generalist AI apps is here, these products suck man.
niche harnesses that solve end to end jobs are about to eat up
this is @steipete work?
HOT TAKE:
Tibo cutting limits is actually good for everyone, let me explain:
1) It allows markets to compete with frontier labs.
Everyone is trying to build workflows around claude code or codex instead of building their own speicalized harnesses for specific jobs.
Codex isn't an operating system, it's a humanoid robot body for your computer (its general but it sucks at certain other jobs)
Startups will be able to compete with the frontier, building their own specialized harnesses that beat codex and claude code at certain tasks.
2) GPT-Sol class models will have cheap Luna-like pricing before we know it.
So even tho your usage limits are less, you won't be able to tell in your outputs due to price performance curve meeting demand.
3) More compute to allocate to the frontier of research
OpenAI and Anthropic are about to start pointing all of their compute at frontier science and biology problems.
Ending diseases, curing cancer, and possibly solving aging.
All in all, this is net positive for humanity
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
WTF??
WHAT IS FABLE 5.5 GOING TO BE LIKE?
Replying to @claudeai
Sonnet 5.5 improves on Sonnet 5 across benchmarks, in some cases dramatically.
It’s a faster, lower-cost complement to Claude Opus 5.5, strongest at well-scoped everyday tasks, fixing bugs, and creating polished documents, slides, and spreadsheets.
It has never been about the niche, it has always been about the founder...
anything can be a billion dollar company
example
start with a fb ads agency for med spa
then sell leads for med spas
then make a tech platform for med spas
Then own equity in med spas
then build a lab to invent med spa products
then build robotics for med spas
then robotics for health in general
etc...
EVERYTHING IS INFINITE


















