Zurich & Shanghai
Joined November 2020
- Tweets5.7K
- Following338
- Followers198
- Likes16.9K
Schön, dass Du der Welt zeigst, dass Deutschland immer noch ein Nazi-regiertes Tätervolk wie eh und je geblieben ist.
Multipolar Panda retweeted
France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Poland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Sweden and Denmark have forfeited any standing to question Iran's compliance with the NPT, or to raise its missile program ever again.
In March, at Île Longue, @EmmanuelMacron unveiled an "advanced deterrence" plan that the other eight have joined. Last week, he watched France test-fire its upgraded M51.3 ballistic missile from the submarine *Le Vigilant*. These steps breach the NPT on three counts.
The first is Article VI. It obliges every party, not France alone, to pursue negotiations in good faith on the "cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date" and on nuclear disarmament. In 1996, the International Court of Justice held unanimously that this is an obligation to bring those negotiations to a conclusion. France is moving in the opposite direction. Macron has ordered more warheads and stopped disclosing how many France holds. The M51.3, built to carry France's new TNO-2 warheads, brings greater range, accuracy and ability to penetrate missile defences. At the 2010 Review Conference, France accepted that non-nuclear states have a legitimate interest in constraining exactly this kind of "qualitative improvement" of nuclear weapons. Pursuing it anyway defies "pacta sunt servanda", the duty of good-faith performance in Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
Articles I and II supply the other two counts. Article I forbids France to transfer nuclear weapons, or control over them, to anyone "directly, or indirectly." It also forbids France to assist a non-nuclear state "in any way" toward acquiring such control. Article II binds the seven non-nuclear participants not to receive such weapons or control. By hosting France's nuclear-capable aircraft and training for its nuclear operations, those states are drawn into the machinery of nuclear use. Macron's promise that the "final decision" stays in Paris is no answer, because the treaty also bars indirect control and assistance. Germany, which renounced "control over" nuclear weapons in the 1990 Two-Plus-Four Treaty, is doubly bound.
The treaty is a bargain of reciprocal obligations, and they are violating its core. Under Article 60 of the Vienna Convention, violating a provision essential to a treaty's object and purpose is a "material breach." In "Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros" (1997), the same Court held that a state's own unlawful conduct can prejudice its right to act on another party's breach.
Yet these capitals are prosecuting Iran under the very treaty they are breaching. Britain, France and Germany led the 2025 IAEA Board resolution finding Iran in non-compliance and triggered the "snapback" of UN sanctions. On 9 September, they joined the United States in having the Board refer Iran to the Security Council over reporting failures and the Agency's lack of access. That access ended with the June 2025 strikes on Iran's safeguarded facilities. No equivalent procedure exists to send France to the Council for enlarging its arsenal, and France and Britain hold vetoes there in any case. A violator of the NPT cannot sit in judgment of another party's compliance with it.
Then there is the hypocritical double standard on missiles. These governments condemn Iran's ballistic missiles, which carry conventional warheads. No treaty in force bars a state from building conventional missiles for its defence. Meanwhile, France has just test-fired a missile with an estimated range of 8,000 to 10,000 kilometres, designed to carry several nuclear warheads.
After the test, Macron repeated his maxim: "To be free, one must be feared." That is the oldest argument for proliferation. The NPT rests on the opposite premise: that more than 180 states can be secure without the bomb. When a nuclear power says that being feared is the price of freedom, it invites every one of those states to reconsider.
@Villepin
Und jetzt bitte ein Lied über all die Länder, die die europäischen Invasoren im Laufe der Geschichte unterwarfen und ausbeuteten.
Die Geschichte der ausgerotteten Völker, auf denen die europäischen Gesellschaften und ihr Wohlstand basieren, kommt hier nämlich leider nicht vor.
Hey French youth & fighters for freedom in Europe!
Look, this 👇 is how your government likes to incite protests in other countries.
Maybe they would like to see the same at home?
Warum sollten sie ihre Waffen niederlegen? Sie haben ausdrücklich das Recht auf Widerstand gegen die Besstzungsmacht Israel.
Wer keinen Terror will, der sollte halt keine fremden Gebiete besetzen und Apartheid praktizieren.
Nur wichtig hierbei: es ist kein alleiniges Schweigen!
Es ist aktive Komplizenschaft. Deutschland ist also Mittäter.
Wer hier nur von ein bisschen Doppelmoral spricht, der macht es sich eindeutig zu einfach.
Jede besetzte Bevölkerung hat das Recht auf bewaffneten Widerstand also einfach Besatzung beenden ansonsten hat Israel keinerlei Recht hier weiterhin Gewalt anzuwenden.
Multipolar Panda retweeted
THIS SPEECH WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY…
Any country that sides with the US will forever lose its credibility to speak on human rights and international law.
‼️👍
‼️ Things As They Really Are, As They Really Have Been, and As They Really Will Be
Fiorella Isabel's judgment of the matters she addresses in the quoted post has remained consistently impaired ever since she became disillusioned with the Russians for not fighting the kind of war she believes they should.
For her, Putin et al. are incorrigible traitors to the causes she imagines they should have and the courses of action she believes they should take.
Pretty much everything she writes in the post below is nonsense born of shallow understanding and myopic perspectives.
Isabel simply cannot wrap her mind around the complexities and perplexities of the current revolution we are seeing in terms of the global military and economic balance of power, and the so-called "soft power" of international diplomatic relations.
Perhaps most of all, Fiorella (among a great many) has never been able to comprehend the concepts contained in something I have been writing about for years, and which I have recently encapsulated in a single statement:
When you are locked in a mortal struggle with an empire in existential crisis, you must administer death by a thousand cuts in order to not evoke a trapped animal reflex in a beast who, at the very least, could destroy a city in a fit of fury.
These things must be done delicately.
This concept has been at the root of all Russian actions since they realized, in the summer of 2022, that they would henceforth be fighting a war against not only the Ukrainians, but also the combined military and logistical power of the United States and its various allies around the world.
It remains my judgment that, all things considered in their proper light and scope, Russia has managed its affairs with remarkable acumen.
Since February of 2022, the Russians have systematically attrited — to a shockingly comprehensive degree — the military capability of the collective western powers.
Even more shocking, they have exposed the inefficacy and vulnerability of most of the western legacy implements of war, and the woefully deficient magazine depth of its armaments.
They have similarly administered a comprehensive demilitarization of Ukraine, which now stands on the precipice of total collapse.
The Russians have inflicted upwards of two million Ukrainian casualties. And, notwithstanding the laughable analyses of the credentialed western "experts", it will eventually be recognized and universally acknowledged that the Ukraine War has produced the most disproportionate casualty ratio of any major war in modern times.
The Russian prosecution of this war will be admiringly studied for generations to come in war colleges and military histories.
Most meaningfully, in course of time, we will see all of Russia's originally enunciated objectives realized:
- Russia will extend its strategic depth to encompass the Black Sea coast to the Danube, Transnistria, and at least all the lands east of the Dnepr — and quite possibly large swathes of the territory west of the Dnepr as well.
- Ukraine, if it survives this war at all, will be comprehensively de-Nazified and de-militarized.
- Assuming NATO continues to exist as a credible military / political alliance, its military presence will be forced back to its 1997 borders.
I also believe Russia, China, and Iran will continue to solidify their "partnership". They will anchor the "Eurasian Century".
The American empire will rapidly recede from Eurasia in coming years. The United States will enter a period of unprecedented political conflict and significant economic tribulation, and quite possibly increasingly strident voices for regional secessions, and organized movements tending towards the eventual balkanization of North America.
I submit that the degree to which Fiorella holds to a radically different view of these questions is the measure of her error, and this will become increasingly apparent between now and the end of this decade.
Multipolar Panda retweeted
„Block befindet sich seit 2021 in einem Sorgerechtsstreit mit ihrem Ex-Mann, dem dänischen Bankier Stefan Hansel. Derzeit muss sie sich vor Gericht verantworten, weil sie die Entführung ihrer beiden jüngsten Kinder aus der Obhut ihres Vaters in Dänemark in Auftrag gegeben haben soll. Nach Angaben der Staatsanwaltschaft beauftragte Block Hannings Beratungsfirma System 360 mit der Durchführung der Entführung im Jahr 2022; die dänische Polizei schritt jedoch ein, noch bevor das Team von System 360 die Kinder an sich bringen konnte.
Hanning sah offenbar von einem direkten Vorgehen ab und beschloss, den Auftrag an Kontakte aus dem Geheimdienstmilieu auszulagern. Bei diesen Kontakten handelte es sich um Yaakov Perry, den ehemaligen Chef des israelischen Inlandsgeheimdienstes Schin Bet, und Danny Yatom, den ehemaligen Leiter des israelischen Auslandsgeheimdienstes Mossad.
Der Prozess gegen Block läuft noch, und die Einzelheiten sind unklar, doch die Vorwürfe lauten wie folgt: Hanning beauftragte Perry und dessen privaten Nachrichtendienst CGI Group damit, ein achtköpfiges Team für die Entführung der Kinder zusammenzustellen; der deutsche Geheimdienstchef verlangte die Einbindung von Yatom; Perry holte David Barkay hinzu – ein ehemaliges Mitglied der Aufklärungseinheit 504 der israelischen Streitkräfte (IDF) und mutmaßlicher Mossad-Agent; Barkay leitete das Team, das die Entführung an Silvester 2023 durchführte.
Barkays Team griff Hansel an und verschleppte die Kinder – einen zehnjährigen Jungen und ein 13-jähriges Mädchen – zu Fuß über die deutsche Grenze; dabei klebten sie ihnen den Mund zu und drohten, sie zu töten, sollten sie um Hilfe schreien.
Hanning bestreitet jegliche Beteiligung an der Entführung, ebenso wie Peri. Barkay hat zwar gestanden, die Operation geplant und durchgeführt zu haben, Hanning oder Yaakov jedoch nicht belastet. Yatom erklärte gegenüber israelischen Medien, er habe “keinerlei Verbindung zu diesem Fall”; zudem sei seine Beziehung zu Hanning rein beruflicher Natur gewesen und habe bis in die späten 1980er-Jahre zurückgereicht.
Dennoch berief Yatom Hanning im Jahr 2021 in den Vorstand seines privaten Cybersicherheitsunternehmens World Health Energy Holdings (WHEN). Gegenüber der Jerusalem Post äußerte Hanning seinerzeit, seine “Kontakte zu Staaten, Strafverfolgungsbehörden und Geheimdiensten” seien für WHEN von Wert – ein Unternehmen, das Spyware an Firmen vertreibt, die ihre Mitarbeiter überwachen wollen.
Hanning fügte hinzu, dass er auch lange nach seinem Ausscheiden aus dem BND “sehr enge Arbeitsbeziehungen, ja sogar Freundschaften” zu Yatom und anderen Mossad-Vertretern pflegte. Beide Männer werden auf der Website von WHEN weiterhin als Vorstandsmitglieder geführt.
Heute gehört Hanning dem Vorstand von “United Against Nuclear Iran” an, einer in Washington ansässigen Denkfabrik, die von den proisraelischen Großspendern Miriam Adelson und Thomas Kaplan finanziert wird und sich seit 2008 ausdrücklich für Militärschläge gegen Iran ausspricht. Adelson und Kaplan stellen rund drei Viertel der Finanzierung der Gruppe bereit; der Rest stammt von kleineren jüdischen Organisationen und Einzelspendern.
Hier kommt ein bekanntes Muster zum Tragen: Immer wieder ignorieren europäische Regierungen die Aktivitäten privater israelischer Spionagefirmen – selbst dann, wenn der israelische Staat selbst in diese Machenschaften verwickelt ist.“