idk man, some rando

Nashville
Joined February 2021
Muchocracker retweeted
I've spent a long time reading about the bombs and the dropping of them. Most of the modern discourse is fundamentally misguided. I've made many a post and thread about this but I'm gonna do it again. Short version: the bombs were worse than firebombing but they ended the war.
This quoted post is unavailable.
12
9
1
125
3,585
Muchocracker retweeted
Gears E-Day is probably the best Gears game, hands down, in terms of gameplay and overall feel. It easily trumps 3's Horde mode with the new Horde Siege mode. That being said, you are approaching a game caught in a weird place; there is a ton of misinformation on both the right and left sides. The fault of this is entirely the writer who tried to force modern politics into the game. That being said, after beating the game, it seems that management muzzled him, so much so that he lamented about not being able to do more on Social. This is Starship Troopers The Movie, the writers intentions were bad, but the execution was good. Mags character is at worst, mildly annoying. The game primarily focuses on Dom, and Marcus in that order, Reyes was a good character, and the addition of Zee the Carmine Patriarch was solid, Tai and his squad get about as much character development as Mags. That being said, Intention is sin in of itself. People should be calling for the writer to be fired. E-Day is solid, and it stands next to Gears 2 for me in terms of story. It was very much a story that Gears needs more of, gritty dark, the Trauma here is good build up for Marcus and Doms relationship, and Doms family.. You can really see the pain beginning to build, which punctuates 2 much better than Gears 1. Though to be fair Gears 1, was kind of hap hazard before they realized they had a franchise in the making so the characters there are very plankish compared to two or E-Day. I'm just glad they didn't do what they did in 3 and change it to lighthearted, especially considering, ya know, everything that happens in three.
Playing GoW E Day and quite enjoying it so far, open any discussion, its american culture war
16
8
2
68
5,462
Muchocracker retweeted
I've known katie a long time. She exploited in @WARDOGS. I told her as much. When I did, she called me someone that "sided with bigots" because I said the 7 day ban was justified. Shroud said "they knew exactly what they were doing, lets not play stupid here", who is coincidentally also someone Katie says she respects. In my conversation with her she told me I was no longer her friend among a myriad of personal attacks. Having attempted to talk to her about it, rather than act in a way that was anything resembling "calm", she blocked me here and everywhere else. All because I didn't think coordinating 20 people to shell a fob you allowed other people to capture ON PURPOSE so you and your viewers could farm 5 million dollars a game meant a ban was justifiable. Happy wednesday.
449
114
28
4,588
429,297
Muchocracker retweeted
It’s clear that some of ya’ll haven’t played a Gears game before so just so you’re aware, some of the most important characters in the Gears universe are women Myraah, essentially the creator and queen of the Locust and is genetically a human woman despite being a hive mind for the Locust Anya Stroud, first minister of the Cog and crucicial in helping to rebuild humanity after the locust war, married to Marcus Fenix I don’t know why we’re acting as if this is some new thing, ya’ll can’t keep slapping the word woke on everything especially stuff you know nothing about
924
430
64
4,734
237,088
Muchocracker retweeted
Not called as a roughing the passer penalty because the passer is not named Patrick Mahomes.
1,540
2,249
368
24,236
1,316,600
"stealth is dead" is about as useful as saying "camo is dead". you should still wear that camo, it is still one more friction layer in the target acquisition process and any measure to lower your signature into the noise floor is beneficial
2
14
350
“Radars are woke.” Range discrimination. Filtering. Target classification. Non cooperative target recognition. I pose to you that radars are actually based and redpilled
19
35
1
553
7,624
Muchocracker retweeted
I rise once again to state that Fincantieri is not responsible for the dog’s breakfast that was the Constellation Class process. This is all in the lap of NAVSEA and OPNAV. Full stop. As I wrote at the time, the 57mm part of the selection process, clearly done due to LCS program backwash, was an indicator that the same people, processes, etc that begat that disgrace were not purged. Uniformed and civilian leadership post selection of the FREMM design failed their Navy and their nation due to their institutional failure to understand the larger picture.
Shipbuilder Behind Failed Constellation Class Wants Back Into The U.S. Navy Frigate Business Fincantieri wants to leverage its U.S. infrastructure for another new frigate as the Navy is once again looking for foreign 'production ready' designs. twz.com/sea/shipbuilder-behi…
35
101
8
613
61,943
Activision: "For Halo, our goal is clear: make the greatest Halo game ever, worthy of its universe and legacy, while staying true to what made players love it in the first place" Also Activision: "Master Chief won't be in the game"
RUMOR: Activision is planning a complete reboot of the Halo franchise with new story The new game may be not about Master Chief at all. Source: TechnicalHalo
146
18
5
200
13,714
Muchocracker retweeted
have you considered like mortaring the piss out of the base, using attack helicopters, tanks, rpgs? the problem with WARDOGS right now is yes some OP things but ultimately its tourists refusing to participate in team play and instead substituting this game for BF/COD. PTFO.
Morning @Brammflakes is the drill spam meta going to looked into or is this just the meta of build fob, spam mortar, build 4 drills, win game?
33
4
1
126
9,890
At Ground Zero, after the last living person was pulled out, the search dogs stopped eating. So the police did something nobody had written down in any manual. They climbed into the rubble, lay down, and pretended to be alive. More than 300 dogs worked the World Trade Center site. They came from every corner of the country, on trucks and in cargo holds, with handlers who had been trained to do one thing. Find people who are still breathing under the ground. That is what a search and rescue dog is built for. Not bodies. Life. They are trained on live human scent. When they find it, they bark, they dig, they light up, and the handler rewards them, and the whole thing means something. The last living person recovered from Ground Zero was a woman named Genelle Guzman-McMillan. She had been buried for 27 hours. A dog found her. She was the last. After that, the dogs kept going out on twelve-hour shifts, across sixteen acres of smoldering steel, at temperatures that burned their paws, and they found nobody. Nobody. Day after day. The handlers noticed it first. The dogs were changing. Their tails were down. They were not eating. They would come off the pile and lie flat and not look at anyone. A veterinarian named Cindy Otto, who spent ten days there working night shifts to care for the animals, put it plainly. The dogs had been sent to find life, and every day they were finding the opposite. It was breaking them. An NYPD officer named Famiglietti described what happened next. They pulled everybody off the rubble. Then they asked for volunteers. The volunteers, police officers, went out into the debris and hid themselves. Under beams. In voids. Curled up in pockets of concrete. They were told to lie down like they were hurt. Then the handlers sent the dogs in. Picture that. A grown man with a badge, a man who had spent the last week pulling friends out of that same pile, lying down in it on purpose. Face down. Holding still. Waiting for a dog. And the dog comes over the top of the wreckage, and catches the scent, and barks, and digs, and finds a person who is warm and moving and alive. And the handler says good girl, good boy, and the whole team celebrates. They called them mock finds. They did it for the dogs. They did it so the dogs would remember what they were for. One of those dogs was a two-year-old golden retriever named Bretagne. She came from Texas with her handler, Denise Corliss. It was her first deployment. They worked ten days at Ground Zero. They found no survivors. But firefighters would come off the pile, stone-faced, not speaking, and see the dog, and something would break open in them. They would kneel down. They would put their face in her fur. One day a man walked up to Bretagne and started petting her. He told Corliss his best friend loved golden retrievers. Corliss asked where his friend was. The man pointed at the pile. "He's in there somewhere." He kept petting the dog. Bretagne went on to work Hurricane Katrina and Rita. She retired at 10. She was the last known surviving search dog of 9/11. On June 6, 2016, at age 16, she was carried into a veterinary office in Texas to be put to sleep. Outside, a dozen firefighters from her fire department stood in a line in their dress uniforms, in the heat, and saluted as she went past. They draped her in an American flag on the way out. Three hundred dogs went into that pile looking for the living. They found one. And when they could not find any more, the men they worked beside laid down in the rubble and let themselves be found, so the dogs would not lose heart. That is the whole story of Ground Zero, really. Nobody could save the dead. So they saved each other. 🇺🇸
537
7,107
561
39,891
1,512,691
Forty voices. Forty lives. A story of courage that will never be forgotten. Standing 93 feet tall at Flight 93 National Memorial, the Tower of Voices holds 40 wind chimes, each representing one of the passengers and crew members of United Airlines Flight 93. When the wind moves across the Pennsylvania landscape, their voices continue to ring. We remember their courage. We remember their sacrifice. We remember the 40 lives lost 25 years ago.
99
2,766
73
18,145
165,372
Muchocracker retweeted
A sea story from 25 years ago… Today started with coffee and a slight hangover from the night before. We were moored at Naval Weapons Station Yorktown, completing munitions loading. I was the ship’s Chief Engineer (CHENG). By 0600 I was in the wardroom of USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) having coffee and breakfast with the ship’s Weapons Officer (WEPS). He and I were discussing the issues of the ship and I relieved him as the ship’s Command Duty Officer - the officer in charge of running the ship while in port. We said goodbye to the Operations Officer and the Combat Systems Officer, who had meetings back in Norfolk. And the day began, just like any other day.
September 10, 2001… I was a Lieutenant in the Navy. My ship was moored at Naval Weapon Station Yorktown loading Standard Missiles and other munitions after an extended maintenance period. That night, I was out with my Sailors at the All Hands Club buying pitchers of beer.
12
64
10
517
53,396
Muchocracker retweeted
Only a 4 hour launch delay is pretty good when you're dealing with exponential player number increase, DDOS, rate limits, server instability, launch day auth fails, and unexpected permission mismatches resulting in false positives. Arc raiders took a whole day to get through queue, poe2 was unplayable the first day, helldivers was unplayable the first day, rocket league was unplayable for like 4 days on launch, every cod known to man has had launch issues, BF6 had a disastrous launch. In the grand scheme of things this launch wasn't great, but it was far from what people are calling a "colossal fuck up"
Replying to @WARDOGS
Launch Hotfix is now live. store.steampowered.com/news/… Backend services are currently offline and will be online again shortly. Thank you for your patience.
28
43
2
547
25,854
There are an implicit assumptions here that I want to challenge: that flying prototypes in a competition is both new-school acquisition, and necessary. It's new-school *if* your marker for "new" is "how we bought several fighters after 1970". It's necessary *if* you're either trying so many new things at once that no one will believe it can all work properly without trying it for real (Advanced Tactical Fighter, which resulted in F-22), or you have such ambitious goals that there's no other way that looks suitable to de-risk (Joint Strike Fighter, which resulted in F-35). JSF needed a full-scale demonstration for several reasons. The program absorbed the prior DARPA ASTOVL and Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF) programs in 1993. By absorbing ASTOVL, the STOVL variant of the JSF became a dominant technical risk, and while there were smaller-scale demos of each of the lift concepts, a full-scale demo was needed. A conventional-only demonstrator wouldn't have de-risked STOVL, and the conflicting needs of the two competing STOVL concepts (direct lift vs shaft-driven lift-fan) ruled out giving the competitors a single F119 engine variant. Also, how to do all this in a common family of airframes that still resulted in a carrier-capable aircraft? There were too many questions with too many unknowns for anyone in charge at the time to be comfortable with signing off on acquisitions without a competition. But what if you didn't need to do all of that? What if you could de-risk the technologies that could fulfill your requirements with much smaller, independent demonstration programs in the years leading up to contract award? Then you could settle the tough, risky acquisition questions for much less money than a full-up competition of prototypes, and judge proposals on their merits. Also, a reminder, the X-32 that was flown was actually NOT fully representative of Boeing's actual submission to the JSF program office for the award decision. The submitted design had a completely different tail configuration, different wings, and a different cockpit section with a rearward-swept inlet. Lockheed-Martin's submission was a refinement of the overall air vehicle config that was flown, with none of the dramatic outer mold line changes of the Boeing submission. So, in the biggest fighter flyoff we've seen, even the flyoff didn't clear everything up. The fact is, if you're outside the F/A-XX PMA, you don't know what its requirements are, what de-risking activities have been done, or what the overall development strategy is. The post I'm quoting strikes me as reading tea leaves through a set of glasses from 1995. By calling for a competition of flying prototypes, you're actually calling for more delays, more expense, and more bloat. Isn't that the very definition of "old-school defense acquisition"?
F/A-XX is old-school defense acquisition. Whether it produces old-school results will depend entirely on what the Navy does next. There is no public evidence that Boeing and Northrop Grumman competed with flightworthy F/A-XX prototypes. There was no public (or private) flyoff demonstrating range, stealth, carrier suitability, maintainability or integration with uncrewed aircraft. Instead, the Navy reportedly selected the contractor with the most convincing classified engineering proposal: digital models, predicted performance, subsystem testing, cost and schedule estimates, manufacturing plans and past performance. That is considerably more substantial than PowerPoint - but it is still a competition between promises rather than demonstrated aircraft. The distinction matters: the Navy has not selected a tested fighter for production. It is selecting one company for Engineering and Manufacturing Development—the phase in which the winner will actually finish the design, build the aircraft and prove whether its projections were accurate. That is traditional Pentagon acquisition: choose one prime and one architecture, invest billions to turn its proposal into hardware, and discover the hardest problems after the competitive pressure has largely disappeared. We know how that can go. Requirements expand. Schedules slip. Costs rise. Production begins before testing is mature. Proprietary systems make upgrades expensive. Eventually the program becomes too strategically important - and the contractor too deeply embedded - to fail. F/A-XX does not have to repeat that history, but avoiding it will require more than calling the program “digital.” The Navy should: • Establish measurable range, payload, availability, maintainability and cost requirements—and resist adding exquisite capabilities during development. • Build and fly representative test aircraft early, then publish as much non-sensitive performance data as security permits. • Demonstrate carrier suitability, signature durability, mission-system reliability and maintainability under operational conditions - not just in models and laboratories. • Test crewed-uncrewed operations with real Collaborative Combat Aircraft, contested communications and representative electronic warfare. • Require government-controlled interfaces and sufficient data rights so new sensors, weapons, autonomy software and uncrewed aircraft can be integrated without asking the prime contractor’s permission. • Preserve competition below the aircraft-prime level by competing engines, mission systems, software modules, sensors and future upgrades wherever practical. • Fund low-rate production only after the design is stable and developmental testing has retired the major risks. Do not manufacture large numbers of aircraft that must later be rebuilt. • Establish enforceable cost, schedule and performance gates - with genuine authority to pause, restructure or recompete work when the contractor misses them. The Navy is beginning F/A-XX with an old-school acquisition model: billions awarded on the strength of a classified engineering case rather than a competitive flight demonstration. The test now is whether it also accepts the old-school outcome - or makes continued funding and production dependent on demonstrated performance. reuters.com/world/us-navys-n…
10
10
1
173
9,303
Muchocracker retweeted
I have spent 23 years documenting the global LED transition of city lighting from space. Across my 4 missions to the ISS, I have photographed every major city on Earth, building a data set of the gradual replacement of sodium vapor lighting with LEDs. The warmer, yellow-orange of gas discharge lamps has been phased out worldwide to multi-colored LEDs, citing energy savings and environmental reasons. Widespread adoption has markedly changed the way our cities look from orbit, and as many have pointed out, how they feel to those on the ground! Here is a collection of the most striking before-and-after photos I have observed:
Miami, Florida as seen from the ISS in 2025. This city has changed tremendously since my previous mission, replacing its yellow-orange sodium vapor lights with multi-colored LEDs. The city grid really pops! This LED takeover of city lighting is world wide.
541
3,430
445
32,330
4,211,547
Muchocracker retweeted
Oh wow look, it doesn't have nearly as much visible grime near the waterline like it did when it was pulled in, just a few days ago. Almost as if the "rust damage" was superficial and all it needed was a good hose down.
NEW - US aircraft carrier departs Thailand after port call
3
14
786
Muchocracker retweeted
As a Floridian, I can tell you we all know 12 dudes that talk like Jason and are quite fluent
Am i the only person who Isn't really that bothered by Jason's voice?
18
36
2
1,194
74,971
Muchocracker retweeted
Alex Hollings
@AlexHollings52Aug 29
The media is making the same mistake it always does about foreign info ops: framing them as though the goal is to advance a specific political agenda. In reality, the goal is specifically to amplify existing cultural fissures in American society.
14
29
2
284
8,979
Muchocracker retweeted
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II
@TheOmniLiberalAug 27
You, someone whose proven themselves to be largely clueless about Israel/Palestine, are confident enough to say I “support genocide” in Gaza, but cannot bring yourself to make any meaningful statements condemning a man who you now see OPENLY supports terrorism against anyone in the west? You had him on your show for an interview and chalked all of his support for terrorism up to “edgy comments”? Is his support for Hezbollah just edgy? Do you support Hezbollah’s existence as a foreign funded and Iranian founded entity in Lebanon like Hasan does? Do you support civilian hijackings and terror attacks on civilians from the Houthis like Hasan does? Would you ask a self-purported Ansar Allah fighter what his favorite anime is and then giggle along in an interview while he tells you about how they drugged the passengers of the Galaxy Leader and sang songs with them? Was China correct in their takeover of the Tibetan savages like Hasan says? Do you support their crackdowns in Hong Kong and would you support them taking back Taiwan? Does Russia have a right to own Crimea because most of the people there were ethnically Russian like Hasan says? Was the murder of two Jews in the US a false flag from the Mossad like Hasan says? Since you’ve never pushed him on any of these positions nor addressed any of them in any meaningful way, I’d say it’s fair to assume every right wing attack on you is most likely correct. You’re just another mask-on, radical Islamist who’s been concealing his radical beliefs in an attempt to infiltrate western media by appearing more palatable to the liberal masses. How else could you explain such unfathomably dishonest sweeping for open support of terrorist attacks?
unavailable
476
1,206
150
14,976
1,635,876