OA journal w/o APC. Open Peer Review, transparent editorial process. Publishes everything Meta in Psy: meta-science, meta-analysis, file-drawers, methods...

Joined May 2018
Join our conference on Open Science and Reproducibility. Keynote by @lakens and @annemscheel, with @nulliusverbapod live on stage at the record shop / “folkölscafé” (bar) Mono. Does the fake code make you cringe? Then you will love the replication games! URL below.
1
29
6
61
24,192
Meta-Psychology retweeted
Interested in replication research? Consider writing a commentary for the next special issue in @Meta_Psy, which will publish critiques of the article "Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size"! (full call text in image)
4
33
3
53
40,017
Meta-Psychology retweeted
Published at Meta Psychology: "We are all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers: Successful replication and extension of Svenson (1981)" The result of a fun workshop I ran with the wonderful Linköping Sweden JDM team. More details: 👇🧵
New preprint: "We are all less risky & more skillful than our fellow drivers: Replication & extension of Svenson (1981)" Fun little replication with amazing @jedilab_liu: @linakoppel @DanielVastfjall & @tinghog Preprint: researchgate.net/publication… OSF: osf.io/fxpwb/
2
12
1
32
12,764
Meta-Psychology retweeted
Your occasional reminder that the peer review process at Meta-Psychology @Meta_Psy is not only the most transparent in the field, it is also the most constructive and civilised. (COI disclosure: I am a member of the Advisory Board and Reproducibility Team at this journal.)
2
13
2,220
Meta-Psychology retweeted
Pretty happy to be able to update this with an "Out now in @Meta_Psy" open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps… I've been worried about measurement reliability issues for a while. But, this reliability heterogeneity thing, it's got me more worried. Especially when we ignore it...
I'm excited to finally share this one. "Exploring reliability heterogeneity with multiverse analyses: Data processing decisions unpredictably influence measurement reliability" All thoughts and feedback welcome! (other than fix titles before arXiv-ing, I can see that 😅)
1
2
2
Meta-Psychology retweeted
TIL that for a few hundred dollars you can buy yourself authorship of a peer-reviewed article. There are dozens to choose from. What not buy this as a gift for your parent, significant other, retiring colleague, or cat? schoolandcollegelistings.com…
8
25
20
72
“Z-curve 2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates” by @BartosFra is now published in @Meta_Psy! open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps…
6
1
21
“Four Failures to Demonstrate that Scarcity Magnifies Preference for Familiarity” by @_stephanoplis is now published in @Meta_Psy! open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps…
2
5
New submission @Meta_Psy: “Means to valuable exploration: II. How to explore data to modify existing claims and create new ones” by Höfler et al.(@?). Participate in open peer review here: psyarxiv.com/r5gmy
4
2
Hi @Meta_Psy, we discussed the "Evaluating the Replicability of Social Priming Studies" (psyarxiv.com/dwg9v/) manuscript at our @ReproducibiliT meeting, and we summarized our thoughts in an open peer-review. Hope you find it useful! docs.google.com/document/d/1…
1
5
23
Meta-Psychology retweeted
As editor of an OA journal that desperately wants libraries to send us $$ so we can stop charging APCs, this story makes me 😞. And frustratingly, bc we’re @CollabraOA & not a Nature jrnl, I bet it wouldn’t matter even if our impact factor went up (we’ll get a new one tomorrow).
I found out my university doesn’t subscribe to Nature Human Behaviour, so I asked why. Librarian: because when the journal started in 2017, it was nothing but “Human Behaviour” with the prefix “Nature”, while subscription costs were ten times higher than normal. 1/10 🧵
7
31
Meta-Psychology retweeted
On several occasions I've asked for rejection decision letters with anonymous reviewers to be made public and forwarded to @Meta_Psy and @CollabraOA only to receive back some baffling responses from respectable editors. Below are a few of those:
1
1
3
Meta-Psychology retweeted
Now @FranckRamus about his personal experiences with replication failures in studies on dyslexia, weaving together the two themes of the meeting . 'Here is a picture you never see in a scientific publication'. Impressive and funny talk about resisting pressures to p-hack. #DBfest
7
22
Really, really proud of this one, to be honest Tldr: How do we get a better window into reality? By standing on the shoulders of ever growing giants of course! Massive thanks also to the wonderfully constructive reviewers, truly a great journey at @Meta_Psy
“A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories” is now published in @Meta_Psy! Corresponding author: Alejandrina Cristia (@?) open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps…
1
7
23
“A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories” is now published in @Meta_Psy! Corresponding author: Alejandrina Cristia (@?) open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps…
1
10
2
22
New article “The Importance of Rigorous Methods in a Growing Research Field” by Tom Hostler (@?) now published in @Meta_Psy! open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps…
1
3
First review protocol published in @Meta_Psy: “Current Understanding of Maternal Healthcare Acceptability from Patients’ Perspectives: A scoping review protocol”! Corresponding author: Joy Blaise Bucyibaruta (@?) open.lnu.se/index.php/metaps…
1
2
New submission at @Meta_Psy by Huffmeier et al.: “Unfortunately, Journals in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology Still Fail to Support Open Science Practices”. Participate in open peer review and comment directly on the pre-print! psyarxiv.com/4yz38
5
1
13
New submission at @Meta_Psy by Röseler et al.: psyarxiv.com/b6t35/ Participate in open peer review by commenting on the preprint!
1
1