Quick question to all those who posited that @realDonaldTrump was a dictator who would end democracy, including nearly all of my academic colleagues. Does the drubbing that the Republicans experienced last night via the democratic process suggest that you were right that he is a dictator or were you wrong to make this claim? Did he kill democracy or did he allow it to express itself?
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Leftists care more for the world than their family/friends because it's easier, not because they're altruistic
Caring for your immediate circle is a tangible daily task that requires effort
Caring for "the world" is an abstract virtue signal that needs zero actual output
Matt McCarthy retweeted
reminds me of this video.
a rude awakening is upon them, they just don’t know it yet.
Matt McCarthy retweeted
You’re a farking clown!!
You deliberately started the clock in mid-2012 so you could pretend the Coalition magically created the debt they inherited.
Labor left them five consecutive deficit years and a structural hole after the GFC. Debt was already on an upward path when they took over.
By 2018-19 they had dragged the budget back near balance. Debt still rose because you can’t instantly reverse the deficits you were handed.
Then you stop the chart right before COVID so you can ignore what came next.
This isn’t analysis. It’s a selective screenshot designed to hide the starting position Labor left behind.
Good try farkwit!!
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Former Police Officer for 16 years here - served in Victoria Police. 8 Years on the Front Line - many of those years working in the CBD, many times at the various protests that would occur at Parliament Steps, or surrounds.
I can unequivocally say, as will many former cops who see this post - that The Left Wing Protest Groups were always far more violent and extreme in their protest behavior than any right wing motivated group.
Every.Single.Time.
It has only gotten worse, and just like police have lost control of crime on the streets, they have lost control of dealing with these violent thugs, so much so, that the police response now is to "Move on" the peaceful Right-Wing motivated groups and let the Left-Wing Extremists have at it. Shameful.
Victorian One Nation leader Warren Pickering has blamed the extreme left for threats against one in five of his party's candidates, saying the right side of politics hasn't caused as many problems.
news24.com.au/politics/austr…
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Planning regulations add $42,000 in compliance costs to an attic renovation -- for no discernible benefit (other than as a make-work scheme for consultants).
stephenkirchner.substack.com…
Matt McCarthy retweeted
In particular, @AlboMP should not use this tragedy as an opportunity to demand censorship given this
dailymail.com/news/article-1…
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Who was first? Palestinians or Jews? The answer is not 'either or'.
In the Egyptian Museum in Cairo stands a slab of black granite carved around 1208 BCE. Its hieroglyphs celebrate the victories of the pharaoh Mernepta: “Israel is laid waste; his seed is not.”
The display makes no mention that more than three thousand years ago, an Egyptian king who knew nothing of the Hebrew Bible recorded that a people called Israel was living in Canaan.
The modern pro-Islamist claim that Jews are latecomers is historically false. Numerous ancient records refute it.
Around 840 BCE, King Mesha of Moab carved a stone boasting of his war against Israel and naming the Israelite king, Omri.
A ninth-century BCE inscription found at Tel Dan refers to the “House of David.”
In 701 BCE, the Assyrian king Sennacherib recorded his siege of “Hezekiah the Judean” in Jerusalem.
These records are written by people with every reason to ignore Israel, that confirm that an Israelite and Judean people lived in the hills of Canaan for centuries before Rome existed.
The second claim is that Palestinians are an ancient people of the region, even older than Israel. This also fails.
The word Palestine is truly old, but it never referred to the people who carry that name today. Herodotus used Palaistinē in the fifth century BCE, and it comes from the Philistines, a seafaring people who arrived on the southern coast around 1200 BCE.
A 2019 study of ancient DNA from Ashkelon, published in Science Advances, found that the Philistines brought European-related ancestry with them, and that within two centuries it had been absorbed into the local population.
The Philistines disappeared after Babylon destroyed their cities around 604 BCE. Rome revived their name in about 135 CE, after crushing the Bar Kokhba revolt, and renamed the province of Judea as Syria Palaestina.
The Arab armies came in the 630s CE, some 1,800 years after Merneptah’s scribe carved the word Israel. They brought new rulers, a language, and a religion, and over the centuries most of the population adopted all three. What we call the distinctly Palestinian national identity arrived much later.
The Palestinian historian Rashid Khalidi, no friend of Zionism, dates its emergence in his book Palestinian Identity to the late Ottoman period and the early twentieth century.
Under the British Mandate, “Palestine” was attached to any group that lived in the region, including Christians, Muslims, and Jews, that the country’s leading English-language Jewish newspaper was called the Palestine Post.
It became the Jerusalem Post in 1950.
Modern genetic studies show that both Jews and Levantine Arabs, including Palestinians, carry substantial similar ancestry from ancient populations.
But historically, the Jewish people have an independently documented presence in that land going back more than three thousand years. Palestinians are, in large part, Arab descendants of the land’s long-term inhabitants, but their national identity is about a century old.
As to the claim of who lived in the land first, between Jews and Palestinians, the answer is not close.
Anyone who stands on a campus and calls the Jews of Israel foreign colonizers in their ancestral home is arguing with a granite slab in Cairo that names a Judean king in Jerusalem nearly 1,300 years before Muhammad was born.
Stones never lie.
Matt McCarthy retweeted
TWO MISTAKES COLLIDED
Australia has messed up housing and infrastructure in a way that has perfectly collided with how we’ve messed up migration:
1) We said ‘no’ to building what needed to be built. Even when we said ‘yes’, we ladled loads of rules and regulations on top, ensuring what we build is incredibly high cost
2) And at the same time our immigration system lost its focus on skills, while also losing its ability to keep a sensible lid on the number of ‘permanently temporary’ migrants by allowing rollovers of bridging visas and by fumbling the removal of visa overstayers
Those mistakes have increasingly collided. The upshot has been that Australia got more people, but not enough of the ‘everything else’ that people need to be happy and productive citizens
Productivity stalled, so our living standards stalled too
This is all our fault. We’ve massively messed up both housing and migration
But by failing to correct course as those mistakes became increasingly clear, we’ve ended up with a risk that we will make even more mistakes with rapidly applied bandaids
Worse still, action on our fundamental fail – the collapse in the productivity of the building sector – remains in its infancy
The frustrating thing has been watching this train crash unfold
Here’s what I wrote three years ago (second half in reply below)
I wouldn’t change a thing …
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Wrong. Whatever one thinks is the cause: Severe Autism, or Autism + Intellectual Disability, has skyrocketed - which can't be "misdiagnosis" like someone with Aspergers.
And taking care of children like this is a 24/7 job. It is indeed an epidemic.
Which is why I am building therapies for it.
Matt McCarthy retweeted
If you publicly raised concerns about what mRNA might do, you were a dangerous crackpot spreading “misinformation.”
If you raised those same concerns privately with Fauci, you were the Surgeon General of the United States.
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Even if we step back and say, fine, perhaps they were simply trying to understand the potential risks and mechanisms involved, the broader point is still horrifying. This was January 2021, a full month after the rollout of an industrial scale effort to inject this experimental product into billions of people, yet at the same time they were secretly discussing catastrophic consequences they did not understand. Just look at Biden Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s reply to Fauci, speculating about the possibility of DNA mutations in fetuses. They had absolutely no idea what this stuff might do. And then, not only did they conceal these problems, but perhaps even worse, they forced this drug on the population under threat of losing their jobs, their ability to travel, and even their freedom.
NEW: Dr. Fauci was concerned in January 2021 that the second dose of the COVID shot “theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”
@SenRandPaul and I released the texts between Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, and Vivek Murthy below.
While I’ve been conducting oversight for years, now that we have the documents and Fauci’s government-issued phone, my investigation has only just begun.
Matt McCarthy retweeted
Perhaps the most damning revelation in the Fauci documents is that every view for which we were denounced as conspiracy theorists and crackpots was being expressed by them in private too.
Origins, lockdowns, infection-fatality rates, masks, the so-called vaccines. Across the board, the supposedly insane and dangerous “misinformation” was exactly what the people in charge were themselves discussing behind closed doors, even as they told the public that only lunatics could believe it.
The mendacity is almost beyond comprehension.
And there will almost certainly be no reckoning. They will carry on as though none of it happened, and when the next crisis comes, they will do it all again.
Matt McCarthy retweeted
And now here’s a chart - data centre builds are masking just how bad business investment otherwise is.
What this doesn’t tell you is that:
• The growth is made up almost entirely of data centres build out
• While that money is being spent here, it’s mostly buying tech hardware produced offshore
• Once built, those data centres require very few local jobs to maintain and operate
• Both the buying of offshore hardware and the operation of the data centres deliver profits almost exclusively to offshore companies (almost entirely based in the US)
• These global tech giants use complex tax structures to siphon those profits out of Australia - mostly into the US, meaning they're taxed to the US' benefit
• And excluding data centre investment, the rest of the economy is actually shrinking
Since the OP has blocked me this seems to be the only way to respond :)
You might want to look at banking deregulation under Keating and then significant changes in the late 90’s, early 00’s to international banking regulations that allowed them to lend more via deregulation and lower interest rates.
So the banks flooded the markets with money. This pumped prices across much of the developed world and all of the Anglosphere.
Replying to @tax_oz @stormin68
So... my powers of deduction mean it comes down to 1 concept - Supply & Demand - with the 4 contributers in order of influence;
1) Mass Immigration (95%)
2) Red Tape
3) Inflation (so people funnel money into houses to reduce the effects)
4) A Culture of property investment
???
“The idea that house prices in Australia exploded because of the CGT discount is wrong, intellectually lazy, and a classic example of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.” afr.com/policy/economy/there…
“The reality is that central bank independence and inflation targeting structurally lowered interest rates significantly at the same time. And the Basel I (1988) and Basel II (2004) accords allowed banks to lend much more to residential property.”



































