Replying to @S___Elliott
For not providing Starlink for a day?
1. Is it the same for all the days before he turned it on for Ukraine?
2. Should ~you~ be in jail for not providing Starlink?
Replying to @EllieGAnders
@greg16676935420 you should order a drone with this
Replying to @MrKrueger70 @ChrisCuomo
Great points. No one seems to remember the Patriot missiles from the second Iraq War and that nothing like Starlink existed at that time.
Thank you for listing every lie they have demanded you believe.
Listen to Trump. He knows much more about this than you. Being emotionally anti-Russia is what Hillary did to you.
Replying to @ChrisCuomo
Yes. He gave access to Ukraine and not Russia, for the last 4 years. Big mistake for a private company to make. He should make it available for either both, or none.
😂Do all the people who said Hillary Clinton was 10 points ahead while you're at it! @DOJCrimDiv
They claimed to be representing Americans' opinions, but were not.
Replying to @RodDMartin @honestpollster
They think he's a moron.
They want him to be a moron.
But then, he's not a moron.
Must be frustrating for them.
Replying to @davidfrum
Why would people care? Starlink shouldn't have been given solely to Ukrainians in the first place. That's playing favorites. At MOST the worst that happened is we stepped putting a finger on the scale of their war.
Replying to @nuckles87 @WedgewoodPolls
It's just like the people who submit papers to humanities conferences that are 100% computer-generated gibberish, and they are accepted, because today's humanities are constructed upon piles of BS. When orgs like NYT have no standards, sometimes people play pranks on them. 🤷♂️
Replying to @Amy_Siskind
Just take the L. Dems got who they voted for. If you think polling influences stuff, then get after your ladies for lying that Hillary Clinton was ahead.
What's amazing here is the zeal with which newsies are piling onto these guys to try to get revenge against the hoaxsters.
They rely heavily on selective poll-result publishing to sway public opinion to liberalism. They do not want their industry being called out.
The polling industry needs major reform. Our statement below:
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Wedgewood Polls released this statement after FiftyPlusOne contacted them regarding evidence of fabricated poll data. They had shared fraudulent raw data the prior day and raised crowdfunding for polls presented as legitimate.
blog.fiftyplusone.news/p/fiftyplusone…
x.com/gelliottmorris…
Replying to @DarrenAdams1967 @WedgewoodPolls
Duh, any operation doing this would do it exactly to the time they are forced to reveal the gag. Releasing the statement after being discovered says nothing about their original intention.
If they did arrange it as a fake, they can easily put up evidence to show that.
Replying to @BlueDogDemUSA @WedgewoodPolls
How much of what you read in the NYT is also fraud?
Replying to @27KeysToTheRace @WedgewoodPolls
Nice try but it's not about the polling industry. It's about the news media that claim to be arbiters of "fact checking" (HA 😂) yet repost news items without any checking of facts.
Replying to @nuckles87 @WedgewoodPolls
Sounds more like 50Plus1 was caught.
Replying to @gelliottmorris
We believe Wedgewood. This sounds like damage control by 50Plus1.
Replying to @Ike_Saul @WedgewoodPolls
The media that reported the polls as real has been revealed to be incapable of checking facts or delivering facts.
THAT is the story.


