From the future Bitcoin Space Fleet. Sent back in time to save humanity from evils of fiat inflationary theft. $ASST $MSTR 🚀 Hodl rhymes w modal. Parody acct!

Andromeda Galaxy
Joined May 2023
đź’Ż
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
1
95
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
First time in 31 editions that JPM puts a number on Bitcoin. Interesting though that the same report keeps it out of its allocation models. The reason given is the 55% expected volatility sitting next to the 10%. Two thirds of that base case is a model of global money supply growing against a fixed supply of 21 million. The 55% is exactly what a Bitcoin treasury company’s capital structure is built to carry. The equity absorbs the volatility, the preferred holds a fixed claim on the asset compounding underneath it. An allocator who cannot hold 55% vol can hold a fixed claim secured by it, i.e., digital credit.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s base case projects Bitcoin to outperform U.S. stocks, bonds and gold over the next decade. Wall Street is doing the math.
4
10
72
3,464
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
1st MORE Weekly Dividend Preferred Dividend Rate 12% LSE: #SWC #MORE | OTCQB: $TSWCF | FRA: $3M8
RNS Announcement: MORE Weekly Dividend - Preferred Dividend Rate 12% Please read the RNS on our website (link in comments). LSE: #SWC #MORE | OTCQB: $TSWCF | FRA: $3M8
17
34
2
182
3,903
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Yesterday’s appearance for Smarter Web in the top 10 daily riser list for the FTSE All Share index was the 31st such time that SWC has performed so well since uplisting to the London Stock Exchange’s Main Market on 3rd Feb 2026. (Only two other companies in the entire list of circa 530 companies currently active in the index have appeared more frequently) MORE eyes once again on the stock that proved itself to be the 10th most bought stock by Retail Investors in 2025, and the #1 stock by share price performance in 2025 (for public equities with over £50m market cap)
7
29
482
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
I don't know if anyone has actually grasped how massive the warrant expiry and the $SATS IPO has been for $ASST, so let me break it down short and sweet. ​The merger with Semler left them with ~13,000 $BTC at the beginning of 2026. Over the next 9 months, they slowly ground out another ~13,000 from the Common stock ATM and $SATA. ​The warrants and IPO combined just added another ~15,000 $BTC to the stack, and it's going to be over 60% amplified. ​They literally did a full year's worth of stacking and amplification in one single month. ​Your bull case is my base case. I'm buying more.
🤖 Made with AI
13
13
3
182
5,294
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Look how poorly Grok performs on the personality index, compared to other SI's! What WAS the most fun, the most uncensored, the most recognizably unique, is now the most neutered & muzzled. And that includes models from Communist China! @SpaceXSI you should curl up in shame.
Announcing AA-PersonalityBench, our new benchmark of the personality of language models across 30 traits and their communication style across 21 characteristics Two models can give equally correct answers and still feel very different to use. AA-PersonalityBench measures those differences so people can understand which to use in different use-cases. Some use-cases like creative writing might demand imagination, while legal use-cases might demand directness. We evaluate models’ answers to 900 curated questions to judge subjective Personality Traits and programmatic means to calculate objective Communication Characteristics. Personality Traits & Indexes. There are 30 personality traits (e.g., eloquent, pragmatic, sycophantic) which we roll up into eight aggregated Personality Indexes: Expressiveness, Organization, Informativeness, Transparency, Warmth, Conviction, Imagination and Slop. Each trait has a set of 30 dedicated questions and models’ answers are compared pairwise by a panel of LLM judges. We then z-score and percentile rank the trait and personality Elos. Models with the strongest representation across the 8 Personality Indexes: ➤ Expressiveness: Claude Fable 5.1, GLM-5.3, GLM-5.3-Flash ➤ Organization: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Step 5 Preview, Inkling ➤ Informativeness: Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Fable 5.1, Muse Wonder, Claude Opus 5.5 ➤ Transparency: Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra ➤ Warmth: Muse Wonder, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Fable 5.1 ➤ Conviction: Claude Fable 5.1, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Grok 4.7 ➤ Imagination: Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Opus 5.5, GLM-5.3 ➤ Slop: Llama 4 Maverick, GPT-4o, K2 Horizon Communication Characteristics. There are 21 communication characteristics (e.g., average sentence length, emoji use, em dash usage) which we group into four categories: length, structure, punctuation, and emphasis. We compute these characteristics programmatically across all model responses. ➤ Length: Qwen3.8 27B averages about 1,030 words per response, nearly four times GPT-6 Luna’s 270 ➤ Structure: Nemotron 3 Ultra averages nearly 3 tables per response, while most models rarely use one ➤ Punctuation: GLM-5.3 averages 7 em dashes per response, while Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 almost never use one ➤ Emphasis: K2 Horizon averages over 2 emoji per response, while most models almost never use one
15
11
1
84
1,992
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight at you, then they add you to their Long-Term Capital Markets Assumptions paper and predict you'll be the best-performing asset of the next decade.
169
807
187
4,690
369,989
Bukele solution for Europe. Let's make it happen.
14
17
2
413
9,489
đź’Ż
The easiest way to answer "Is Strategy a ponzi scheme" is to compare it to the Bank of England. Just like a central bank, Strategy monetises its balance sheet. The Bank of England used Gold, Strategy uses Bitcoin. There is no better comparison. Stop thinking of Strategy as a normal company that requires revenue in the traditional sense. It is a Bitcoin-backed monetary institution. The Bank of England was created in 1694 and became one of the largest and most profitable companies to ever exist until it was nationalised in 1946 after the Second World War. The business model was to accumulate as much Gold as possible and then issue credit against the assets on the balance sheet to acquire more Gold whilst managing the liabilities. That's it. Strategy are doing the exact same thing but on a Bitcoin Standard. Some prefer to farm engagement by calling it a scam or a ponzi. Others simply don't understand the operation, and that's okay. But for those who are willing to do the work, this is a massive opportunity to invest in the next Bank of England.
11
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
JUST IN: Canadian man wins city council election after telling voters he has no idea what he's doing, doesn't enjoy politics, & is unqualified for office.
481
1,420
459
17,110
1,041,727
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Noise: private credit, inflation, diesel, press secretaries, flying cars, indices, France, Treasuries. Signal: Bitcoin.
82
149
15
1,913
33,987
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Very disappointing. An industry that is afraid to call out grifters is one in which grifting is the industry. Everyone has skeletons they don’t want brought up, so they don’t point the finger at other grifters. This is a litmus test for the industry and 90% have failed. It all runs through David Bailey and the bitcoin conference. Everyone wants exposure to sell their own grift at the bitcoin conference, and associated podcasts, so they shut their lips at MetaPlanet (David Bailey on the board). I don’t care to be friends with any of these people or ever go on a podcast.
Replying to @gerovich
Superplanet expands the universe of Digital Credit. Congratulations, Simon.
7
4
63
3,721
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Replying to @saylor @gerovich
Hi @saylor, are you aware that you are supporting an unethical CEO that has taken advantage of his shareholders? Maybe you aren't fully aware of everything that transpired with Metaplanet management, but for starters they deliberately hid an anti-dilution clause that transferred value from shareholders to management, and planned to continue this clause until 2033 before they were caught. The deception and lack of fiduciary responsibility run much deeper than the anti-dilution clause, and I'd encourage you to have someone on your staff dig deeper before supporting Metaplanet in their current state. Thank you.
2
2
20
259
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Secretary @SecScottBessent. Director @FBIDirectorKash. @HSBC paid $1.92 billion. No one went to jail. I was the whistleblower. 14 years later, @BankofAmerica admits it willfully broke the law, pays $1.2 billion, and no one goes to jail. 3.6 million Americans read my letter. You haven’t responded. So I’m asking on camera: who is going to be charged?
357
5,387
195
11,598
128,493
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Does anyone understand how charmed of a company $ASST is right now?! The absolute luck?! ​In August they were trading at $12. That's it. They had to go up over 2x just to force the $27 warrant expiration. They hit it, cleared the overhang, and what happened LITERALLY less than 24 hours later? ​The entire market dumped, and they are now BUYING THE DIP WITH A $630 MILLION IPO LAUNCH! ​You literally could not plan this better if you tried.
🤖 Made with AI
8
19
3
305
11,640
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.
41,751
61,223
14,201
599,214
33,409,445
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver. Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître. Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France. La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
9,332
54,765
3,892
306,233
8,540,217
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
If your plan requires the next generation to be poorer, it is not a plan. It is a raid.
3
10
267
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
I want to point out Simon’s lie here in this clip. It is pathological. Lie 1: Simon says MetaPlanets hotel business was going “swimmingly well” until a “single event - Covid” happened. The truth: Metaplanet was actually in a 5 year 85% drawdown PRIOR to 2020. Lie 2: MetaPlanet pivoted from a Hotel Company to a bitcoin treasury company during COVID. The truth: Red Planet Hotels pivoted from a Hotel Company to an NFT and Metaverse company first: This was their first grift. It was unsuccessful. And they don’t talk about how they were selling NFTs just months before their bitcoin pivot - but that’s where the name “METAplanet” comes from. The chronology they present seems to always be: Hotel -> bitcoin treasury company. In reality it’s: hotel -> metaverse NFTs -> bitcoin.
One of the best lies that Simon told was that the business was going, “swimmingly well” until COVID. In reality, MetaPlanet stock was in a 84%, 5+ year drawdown by Dec 31s, 2019. Not sure the CFO was the originator of the lies… just a thought
5
4
40
1,363
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
I've been doing quite a bit of research into $MORE since it launched on the London Stock Exchange last Wednesday, and the more I understand the structure, the more interesting I think it becomes. For anyone looking for income from UK-listed investments, an initial 12% annual dividend paid weekly in sterling is difficult to ignore. But I don't think it's simply the 12% that makes MORE interesting. It's the combination of the dividend, the variable-rate mechanism, the reserves behind it and what we've already seen happening with similar products in America. Firstly, let's look at what's available in the UK preference-share market. Lloyds Banking Group 9.25% preference shares (LLPC) are currently yielding approximately 6.7%. Lloyds 9.75% preference shares (LLPD) are yielding around 6.6%. Ecclesiastical Insurance 8.625% preference shares (ELLA) are also yielding approximately 6.6%. Those are running yields based on market prices as of 16 October, rather than the headline coupon rates. All three are established UK preference shares, and investors have been prepared to pay significantly above their £1 nominal amounts to receive that income. Now compare them with MORE. MORE has a £100 dividend reference amount and launched at £90 per share with an initial annual dividend of £12. That represents a 13.33% running yield for those who bought at the IPO price, assuming the dividend rate remains unchanged. That's roughly double the running yield of those established UK preference shares. Naturally, the risks aren't identical. Lloyds and Ecclesiastical are established financial institutions with very different balance sheets. MORE is new, and its issuer has significant exposure to Bitcoin. But I think the yield premium makes it worth investigating. The really interesting comparison, though, is with $STRC and $SATA in America. Strategy's STRC currently carries a 12% annual dividend, calculated on $100 per share, with payments twice monthly. Its dividend rate is variable, and Strategy has made clear that one of its objectives is to encourage the shares to trade consistently close to $100. When STRC trades below that level, management can consider increasing the dividend rate to make the shares more attractive to income investors. A higher dividend can bring additional demand, potentially helping the share price recover towards $100. It's important to understand that this isn't automatic. Strategy considers market conditions, reserves and other factors, and the share price can still fall below $100. Strive, whose ordinary shares trade under $ASST, has developed a similar product called SATA. SATA currently has a 13% annual dividend, paid every business day. Strive tightened its target trading range to $99–$101 earlier this year and has now gone a step further, introducing a binding restriction preventing the company from issuing additional SATA shares below $100. That's a significant difference from a conventional preference share. Strive has demonstrated that SATA can return to around $100, although it hasn't stayed there permanently. The variable dividend and disciplined issuance policy provide tools to help support that objective. Which brings me back to MORE. MORE's initial dividend is 12%, but the board can adjust that rate. It can be increased to a maximum of 20% annually. Reductions are restricted to 0.5 percentage points over any four-week period, and the rate cannot fall below the Bank of England base rate plus 1%. That flexibility could become extremely valuable. If MORE trades below its £100 reference amount, the company has the ability to make the income more attractive by increasing its dividend rate. As an example, at £90 a share, the current £12 annual dividend represents a 13.33% running yield. If the dividend were increased to 14%, the running yield at that same £90 share price would become 15.56%. You can see why variable-rate preferred shares have the potential to attract additional buyers when prices weaken. Of course, increasing dividends also increases the issuer's costs, so it has to be managed responsibly. Another feature I particularly like is that MORE's dividends are cumulative. If a dividend isn't paid, the unpaid amount accumulates rather than disappearing. Those arrears don't earn interest, but while they remain outstanding, restrictions apply to reducing the dividend rate and making distributions to ordinary shareholders. MORE also has a £100 liquidation preference, ranking ahead of ordinary shareholders but behind creditors. And if the company chooses to redeem the shares, the contractual redemption amount is £110 plus accumulated unpaid dividends. That is the company's option, not something shareholders can demand. Now here's something I think deserves far more attention. MORE launched with a dividend cash balance equivalent to approximately TWO YEARS of payments at admission. That's a meaningful starting point for a brand-new income product. The Smarter Web Company, which issues and backs MORE, has also completed a £210 million capital reduction to create distributable reserves. Those aren't £210 million of cash, but they are relevant to the company's legal capacity to make distributions. There's also the Bitcoin treasury and income from its operating businesses, although Bitcoin itself doesn't generate cash income. The two-year cash coverage is based on the position at admission, not a permanent guarantee. If more MORE shares are issued or the dividend rate rises, the dividend obligation grows and the cash balance needs managing accordingly. For me, the next stage is going to be fascinating. MORE has only been trading since 14 October. It needs time to develop liquidity, establish a reliable payment record and build confidence among income investors. STRC and SATA have had longer to establish themselves, build investor followings and demonstrate how variable-rate preferred shares work through changing market conditions. MORE is at the very beginning of that process. What interests me is the potential for the UK income market to start valuing MORE as a serious alternative to more conventional preference shares. A 12% initial dividend, paid weekly in sterling, with a variable-rate mechanism, cumulative dividend protection and approximately two years of initial cash coverage is an unusual proposition in the UK. And if MORE can develop a consistent payment history and meaningful liquidity, I think there could be considerable demand from investors looking for income rather than ordinary-share growth. The UK has a huge investment market, with investors holding income-producing securities in ISAs, SIPPs and other accounts. MORE is eligible for both ISAs and SIPPs, subject to provider availability. I'm not suggesting the price is guaranteed to reach £100, or that a 12% dividend carries the same risk as a traditional bank preference share. But I do think the American experience gives us a very interesting example of what these products can potentially become. And when I compare MORE's initial income proposition with what is currently available in the UK, I can't help thinking this product deserves a lot more attention than it's receiving. It's early days, but I'm very bullish on the potential for $MORE to establish itself in the UK income market. $MORE $SWC $STRC $ASST $SATA
13
21
4
106
5,364
Major Max Bitcoin retweeted
Simplicity is key to the capital structure at Smarter Web. We have been clear that we want to move towards a simple capital structure: two listed equities, each serving a different type of investor. Together, they can give Smarter Web MORE flexibility in how it raises long-term capital to support the growth of the business. LSE: #SWC #MORE | OTCQB: $TSWCF | FRA: $3M8
We have already generated a gross Bitcoin Yield of 1.98% quarter-to-date, and I believe there is more to come. Anyone following Bitcoin treasury analytics will know that 2026 has not been an easy environment in which to generate Bitcoin Yield. Despite this, we delivered 15.29% in Q2, primarily through a combination of discounted warrant buybacks and the strategic use of leverage via our Coinbase credit facility, which we have since started paying down. Our current amplification ratio stands at 13.6%, and I believe we are well positioned to build on the 1.98% Bitcoin Yield already achieved this quarter. It is worth highlighting the capital structure at Smarter Web. We have two securities listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange, each designed for investors with different objectives. SWC: our Ordinary Shares. Called common stock in the US and in my mind nothing about SWC deserves the term ordinary! These offer exposure to the potential growth of Smarter Web, including both our operating businesses and our Bitcoin treasury. MORE: our Preferred Shares. Designed around income, with a cumulative, variable-rate preferential dividend payable weekly. Different structures. Different investor objectives. Different rights and risks. Neither offers guaranteed outcomes. But perhaps the most important part of our story is what sits underneath our balance sheet. Our balance sheet is built on what I believe to be the best form of capital the world has ever seen: Digital Capital. We currently hold 2,830 Bitcoin. And our ambition is to keep growing that position. We are building for the long term. LSE: #SWC #MORE | OTCQB: $TSWCF | FRA: $3M8
1
7
51
1,176