https://xitter.cf/t.co/N4izH4LQoq #woke #RejoinEU #DontBuyTheSun #GTTO #FBPE Still European 🇪🇺. No DMs. Really.

United Kingdom
Joined August 2008
Not all men, but...
17
Ed Sheeran is not politically neutral. He's been publicly anti-Brexit, endorsed Labour in 24, called on US Congress to pass Equality Act in 21, and played in concert for Ukraine in 22. Being against genocide is not anti-semitic. I stand with Macklemore.
1
53
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
BREAKING: YES! The former U.S. pardon attorney who was fired for refusing to help restore Mel Gibson's gun rights hits the Justice Department with a MASSIVE lawsuit. This is going to be fun to watch... “Shortly after President Trump took office, Ms. Oyer was asked to disregard her duties and facilitate a political favor for the actor Mel Gibson, based on Mr. Gibson’s relationship with President Trump. Ms. Oyer was asked to make it seem like an independent review had concluded that Mr. Gibson, who was convicted of a domestic violence offense, should have his gun rights restored,” states the suit, filed on Liz Oyer's behalf through the nonprofit organization Democracy Forward. Oyer previously revealed that she was forced out of her job by then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche because she refused to do a mafia-style favor for Mel Gibson, a close Trump ally. The disgraced actor lost his federal firearm rights due to a domestic violence conviction. In 2010, he allegedly assaulted his then-girlfriend Oksana Grigorieva while she was holding their infant daughter, smashed her in the mouth, and threatened her with his gun. On top of that, a leaked phone conversation revealed that Gibson admitted to slapping her and at one point told her: "If you get raped by a pack of n*****s, it'll be your fault." He repeatedly called her a "whore," "bitch," and "c*nt." "Although Blanche had the power to do it on his own, he tried to force Oyer to give her stamp of approval," Rep. Jamie Raskin previously stated. "Not convinced of Gibson’s rehabilitation or his lack of dangerousness, and knowing that over half of women murdered in the United States are killed by a current or past intimate partner, and the presence of firearms in an abusive household increases the risk of murder by 500%, Oyer refused to have anything to do with Blanche’s dangerous and unethical suggestion. Blanche sacked her." This woman took a brave stand for what was right and she paid the price for it. “Ms. Oyer had serious concerns about the public safety implications of granting Mr. Gibson’s request in light of his history of domestic violence and the well-documented dangers of placing firearms in the hands of domestic abusers," the lawsuit states. The firing was carried out without proper adherence to the legal protections afforded to civil servants, including 30 days' notice and the opportunity to respond in writing. Not only that, but the Trump administration failed to provide a "written decision specifying the reasons for the removal." Obviously, Blanche didn't want to put it in writing that he was sacking Oyer for refusing to perform a crooked political favor. Additionally, Oyer's suit alleges that her First Amendment rights were violated because she was targeted for her perceived connections to the Democratic Party due to the fact that she was hired when Joe Biden was President. “This case is about much more than what happened to me," stated Oyer. "All Americans rely on nonpartisan civil servants to keep them safe and to uphold the law without fear or favor. I was fired because I refused to put politics ahead of my duty to the American people. My firing violated my constitutional and statutory rights, and it also jeopardized public safety." “That is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to operate, and it is not how public servants in this country should be treated," she added. "If career officials like me can be fired for refusing to bend the rules to serve the president’s friends, then the message to every public servant is clear: loyalty to a politician matters more than loyalty to the Constitution. I cannot accept that.” It's worth mentioning that Oyer was fired when the administration was still riding high, buying into their own hype, and convinced that a permanent culture shift towards their brand of fascism had occurred. They overplayed their hand, thinking that the future belonged to them. Now, Trump's approval has cratered, his entire party is electorally radioactive, and the bill is coming due for all of their transgressions. Please ❤️ and share if you hope that Liz Oyer cleans their clocks!
72
2,106
54
5,902
157,294
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
BREAKING: MASTERCLASS! Dr. Abdul El-Sayed goes on Fox News and DOGWALKS Jesse Watters on one hot button issue after another — and even gets the far-right hack to laugh at prominent Republicans. He went into the lion's den and came out with a new fur coat... "You'd give them back their Air Force, their Navy?" Watters asked El-Sayed about Iran. "No, I'd go back to the time when we were at peace and we actually had nuclear containment," El-Sayed said. "Now Jesse, you like to, I mean look, I understand selective memory about history, but we had a JCPOA that was well negotiated, that actually had nuclear non-proliferation far more securely than what we have right now after having gone to war for the better part of six months." This is an absolute bullseye of a point. Obama's Iran deal was ironclad and ensured that Iran wouldn't obtain nuclear weapons. Trump tore it up because he hates everything related to our first Black President and Republicans cheered him on as he did it. Now, we find ourselves embroiled in a failed war to supposedly destroy Iran's nuclear program, even though our own intelligence agencies concluded that they were not pursuing such a weapon. Obama used diplomacy to score an unprecedented win. Trump used military force and it ended in a historic defeat. "Yeah, I like the fact that the nuke program is buried under a mountain of rubble, they can't even get access to it, but that's me," said Watters, trotting out a childish White House talking point. "I think we'll figured [sic] it out. The thing you said about—" "Let me just stop you right there," said El-Sayed, refusing to let him pivot. "Sure. Go ahead," said Watters. "I understand you're not good at math. I get that. I'll give you that," said El-Sayed. "But science, we gotta talk about science, okay? You understand that like nuclear material doesn't just go away because you buried it under a mountain of rubble. You understand they can still go back and bury it out, right?" "Yeah, we're watching it from Space Force," said Watters. "So we're not any more secure than we were back then," hammered El-Sayed. "Okay, let's move on," said Watters, unable to defend his point. He then asked El-Sayed about his claim that Republicans attacking Sharia law is a tendril of white supremacy. Once again, El-Sayed crushed him. "So getting rid of Sharia law is white supremacy? Can you explain that one?" said Watters. "Do you know what canon law is, Jesse? I assume you're Christian, right?" said El-Sayed. "Yeah, tell me," said Watters, who clearly had no idea what canon law is. "All right, so canon law is the name for Christian law," explained El-Sayed. "I don't begrudge you your right to practice your faith as you choose. I don't know why the idea that I could practice my faith as I choose is a problem. Nobody is trying to push Sharia law on anyone else. Just like, I hope, nobody is trying to push canon law on anybody else, because we live in an America where you should have the freedom of your religion." "So the idea that you have somebody like Tommy Tuberville, who barely was good at coaching football," said El-Sayed, causing Watters to laugh at the ignorant MAGA senator's expense, "is out here trying to ban Sharia law when there's less than 1% of the Muslim community in America, as if somehow Muslims are out here trying to push Sharia law, that seems to me to be deliberately targeting the Muslim community because they're different." "And I'm just saying that I have no issue with people practicing their faith," El-Sayed said. "In fact, I would never want somebody to push their faith on me, and I would never want to push my faith on somebody else." "Good, because no one wants you to get rid of your religion. No one wants that," said Watters, who is part of a political party that absolutely wants to get rid of Islam. "But when people preemptively go out there and start preemptively passing laws to ban something that's not happening, what you're trying to do is target a very small community because they're different, and this operates. I mean, look, I'm just going to say there's statistical evidence that the President and the Vice President want to target me simply as a function of my faith," said El-Sayed. We have to just stop and applaud El-Sayed for this particular point. This man went on Fox News — the most Islamophobic network in the entire country — and proudly defended his Muslim faith. That takes serious courage. And he wasn't done there... At one point, El-Sayed referred to his MAGA opponent in the Michigan Senate race as a "beta," causing Watters to laugh once again. This guy is so damn charming, even a Fox News hack like Jesse Watters isn't immune. Predictably, Watters eventually tried to turn the conversation to the topic of transgender athletes. When he did, El-Sayed gave one of the best responses we've ever seen to the bad faith talking point. "Again like Jesse you have not asked me one time about the issues that people actually care about in Michigan," said El-Sayed. "You don't want to talk about gas prices." "You don't want to talk about groceries." "You don't want to talk about healthcare." "You don't want to talk about this stupid trade war that's about to destroy Michigan's economy." "You don't want to talk about the actual war that's destroying our military." "You don't seem to want to talk about any of those things. You want to bring up all this culture war that you know I'm not here to fight a culture war," he added. Watters sputtered a response and whined that it was his interview so he got to choose the questions. He then asked a question about trans athletes. El-Sayed refused to take the bait. "I'm running for U.S Senate and in Michigan, as the next U.S. senator in Michigan, I'm interested in getting money out of politics, putting money in your pocket, and passing Medicare for All," said El-Sayed. Watters refused to drop it, and kept driving for a sports-related soundbite. "At the end of the day the decision of who gets to play what sports ought to be decided by the people who govern sports. I'm running for U.S. Senate!" said El-Sayed. "Jesse it's insane, I'm out here trying to take on like the healthcare crisis and Big Pharma and you're asking me about who gets to play what sports?" "I don't know. It's kind of a big thing if you've been following the news recently Abdul," said a desperate Watters. Towards the end of the interview, Watters called El-Sayed "naive" and that said some Democratic policies are "wacky." Once again, El-Sayed had the perfect response. "You know what's wacky, though? Can I just tell you, you know what you didn't ask me about?" said El-Sayed. "We've got a President of the United States who cares more about the drapes in a ballroom that shouldn't be built than he cares about the war he just got us into, or that he cares about the affordability crisis. "That seems to me to be a little bit wacky. If we want to have a serious conversation about what Michiganders are feeling, I'd love to come back on and talk about getting money out of politics, putting money in your pocket, passing Medicare for All, because I'm telling you, none of that is whacky, and that's what Michiganders want." "We'll do it again, Abdul," said Watters. "It was a good conversation. Thank you so much," said El-Sayed. This is how it's done ladies and gentlemen. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is going to make one hell of a senator. Please ❤️ and share if you're a fan of El-Sayed!
58
744
28
3,441
110,318
Don't focus your ridicule on Natalie Harp. She's clearly not well. Focus it on the disgusting POS that groomed her and is enabling and taking advantage of her current mental state. Stop blaming the women.
1
3
40
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
Dear Nigel @Nigel_Farage When you chose to trigger the Clacton by-election, you said REFORM UK would pay for it not the British public. Sadly that's against the law. However, there's no law to stop you distributing £340,000 among Clacton charities. Please consider reposting
32
730
8
1,588
46,343
Please repost if you want Andy Burnham to work to restore our EU Freedom of Movement as soon as possible. It was robbed from us by the worst abuses of democracy in modern British history. – at Brighton, England
230
1,485
32
2,742
45,631
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has received £20m in donations from cryptocurrency investors since the general election, The Independent can reveal. Read more: independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
600
1,169
107
2,229
257,750
Tonight I think a lot of journalists should read the @samaritans guidelines before posting/tweeting/writing media.samaritans.org/documen…
6
70
1
308
15,804
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
DEAR MEDIA - Do your goddamn job and find a better word than "settler" for someone who terrorizes families and steals their homes.
354
4,285
86
21,207
223,745
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
Sickened by the news that Jeff Bezos’ consortium has bought roughly a third of Liverpool Football Club. Many fans have rightly focused on Amazon’s anti-union practices, its treatment of workers, and the fear that Liverpool will become just another asset in a billionaire’s portfolio. Those concerns are real. But there is something even darker at the heart of this deal. Amazon is a central partner in Project Nimbus, providing cloud and AI services to the Israeli state. While Israel carries out a genocide against the Palestinian people, Amazon’s technology helps underpin the infrastructure that makes it possible. And now that fortune is buying its way into Anfield. So ask yourself: what does it mean when a club built on solidarity - a club that stood with the Hillsborough families against the establishment, that has always claimed to stand with the oppressed, that prides itself on being different - welcomes investment from a man whose empire is entwined with Israel’s system of occupation, apartheid and genocide? Liverpool is more than a business, it’s a community. Supporters have a voice. We’ve used it before: against the Super League, against ticket price hikes and against owners who forgot what this club stands for. We MUST use it again.
897
955
147
4,078
438,738
NF offered to pay the election cost, but wasn't allowed to, because democracy. If he cares so much about the people of Clacton, why not give the money he to good causes in Clacton instead, for the benefit of the people who actually voted for him? Instead of Faragefest. #grifter
1
2
37
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
20
89
1,158
Question for the Electoral Commission - there is a byelection happening in 3 weeks - should a candidate be platformed by a news Channel in this way - will GB News offer the same time slot to all 33 other candidates in Clacton - are rules just ignored because it's Farage (again)
1
1
57
Hey this fault has been ongoing since 11 July and the email updates are all identical except the expected date of resolution keeps moving further on. Why did you close my complaint saying fault fixed? @virginmedia
2
2
2
1,632
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
I am not racist Ergo I am not a Reform or Restore voter I am not a bigot Ergo I am not a Reform or Restore voter I am not a xenophobe Ergo I am not a Reform or Restore voter I am full of cold hard rage for Reform & Restore Ergo I am not a Reform or Restore voter Never will be
2
2
8
286
Mo Woke Rejoiner retweeted
I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue. On April 21st, the left screen moved first. I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug. At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy. On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me. At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire. Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83. I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags. My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports. The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026: Reviewed. That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one. Let me show you my flags. March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it. March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it. April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it. April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it. April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it. That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one. The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March. Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012. Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence. Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets. The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade. I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email. The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action. One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared. One account is a coincidence. But there were six. Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000. My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger. March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes. The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event. The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting." Then the White House sent the email again. I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread. I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated. But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed. Zero prosecutions. As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations. I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations. The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still. In my field, we call this price discovery.
1,026
12,799
1,770
30,074
1,940,360
Just because a President announces he’s agreed to a two week ceasefire moments before he threatened to commit war crimes, does not mean he is suddenly fit to serve. #25thAmendment
8,269
18,515
637
102,207
1,218,049
He had a whole lot of help.
1,023
3,605
123
13,225
254,917