My style of trading:
- Pure intraday scalping of rotations
-I go where there is volatility, movement and clean orderflow
-Flat EOD. Rare that I carry overnight
-Not concerned with sounding smart or developing a narrative
- If it goes down I will sell, if it goes up I will buy
Macro “KING LEEROY” Tactical 👑 retweeted
Don’t underestimate the high horsepower high agency generalist in the AI era
Straight up rinsed wow
Hey @nehal_rm1 happy to have this conversation with you. Let’s talk about what it means to be a profitable trader. Since September 1, you’ve had 35 PRO+ live trading accounts. You have gone max loss in 21 accounts and you took out profits in 14 accounts. Your live trading resulted in a net loss of $6,100 across all these accounts. So, you are not net profitable - even though you took withdrawals.
In total though, you lost $56,000 of our live trading capital (net of the 10% profit share we got on your withdrawals) because of the way you cycled through accounts. It's a good trade for you - you got $67k in payouts from your PRO+ accounts. All the while not actually being a profitable trader in the market.
But we're not going to enable this reckless behavior more. All of your max loss accounts happened within a day of the account even opening. In four trading days alone, you lost $89,685 in live trading capital.
Did you have some good days? Two. A $30k and a $20k day. And you showed some promise. The second to last set of PRO+ accounts were profitable. That's why we initially gave you an exception for PRO+ Development. We always try to give traders the benefit of the doubt. We're rooting for you. And then you lost $18,000 of live capital in one day on 10/13. The same day those live accounts were opened.
So no, right now, we’re not going to give you a full $20k again to lose in live markets. It’s not OK to lose $20k and close your accounts in one day. And we think you know that…
- @markrmeadows, Director of Trading Risk
Even the nice parts of LA are descending into shitholes.
The criminals know they can do this shit even less than a mile away from the sheriff’s department
But make no mistake, you dare park even 5 minutes over your paid parking time and you are 100% getting a ticket
Nice weather and anarcho-tyranny!
Bloodied 'Pretty Little Liars' star Keegan Allen robbed at gunpoint, knifepoint in attack outside luxury Hollywood grocery store trib.al/mU6RXVp
Buy when it’s going up
Sell when it’s going down
I dont get it people find the most complicated ways to make money trading just like, punt? Punt things that move in measurable ways? idk why half of you are trading treasury vol or thinking about what the feds doing -- at all -- especially because you cant even prove it's the source of your returns (or lack thereof) when ur trade is some complicated pile of dog shit that ends up being an expensive expression of some derivative directional move
Macro “KING LEEROY” Tactical 👑 retweeted
Replying to @MacroTactical
Man when somebody says what you were trying to say 100x more succinctly and powerfully
This is a great take and a great counter signal to when people complain about saturation.
Saturation shows pmf.
.@OpenRouter co-founder Alex Atallah on the "everyone is building the same thing" take:
"This reminds me of this tweet I saw... Everybody's building an agent loop with notifications, third-party connectors, context management, memory, sandboxes, agentic web search, an always-on agent on top."
"This product is showing up everywhere. It is showing up everywhere, but these are just the new table-stakes primitives."
"A 2005 version of that tweet would be: 'Oh, everybody's building the same thing. A database, a users table, a sign-in page, a sign-up page, a profile page, a logout page. Everything's the same.'"
"There's like a lot of differentiation really. There's table-stakes needs for AI just like there's table-stakes needs for the web."
@alexatallah @amasad
This is wild. I was assured that everything was fine and it's blue skies and no-skimming. Crazy work
Macro “KING LEEROY” Tactical 👑 retweeted
no i don't give a single flying fuck what your gay mother fucking bonds are doing man
i dont give a flying fuck if the 10 year goes to 30%
i will remain bullish until mid 2029
all dips are for buying
fuck your bonds wigga
Macro “KING LEEROY” Tactical 👑 retweeted
If you're using AI all day and you're not making more money, it means you have the same problem you had before the AI: you're doing stuff that doesn't matter.
This is the real reason 99% of people don't get ahead. They don't know how to tell the difference between what's important and what's irrelevant. And just doing irrelevant things faster gets you the same outcome: nothing.
Except this time it cost you tokens.
Seeing all the fuss on TradingView, tbh I haven’t opened it up in about 2 months
Built my own charting with various data sources, to my exact specs. It’s charting, researching, backtesting/stats, alerts, journaling
Cancelled my TradingView in solidarity with the trader community now
.@curtis_yarvin predicts the future belongs to invite-only social networks because the open internet destroyed reputation:
"I think the future entirely belongs to invite-only social networks. An open space with no reputation system, you get what we called Eternal September 30 years ago. Low-quality people flood in, and all the high-quality people leave."
"Everything in the world happens on little group chats now. There's a huge amount of reputation capital that's locked up in who's in what group chat."
"There's only four billion names. Having a limited supply of identity and having to lay down a couple of bucks to get in the door greatly reduces the bot problem."
"The internet has become an incredibly low-trust society with no reputation signals, and creating a new commons is gonna be incredibly hard."
@urbit
Can’t stress this enough. Go and hunt assets and tickers that are actually moving (up or down)
Seeing a lot of folks on here fighting tapes “it should be trading here because another asset class did this” like oil v rates, rates v growth equity
Macro “KING LEEROY” Tactical 👑 retweeted
No statistical measure has inflicted more losses than Z-score























