Structural biologist and biochemist. CNRS researcher at CBM Orléans. Interested in protein modifications & interactions. Also husband, dad of 3, friend, ☧.

Orléans, France
Joined August 2020
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Marcin J. Suskiewicz retweeted
[HOMMAGE] Le CNRS a appris avec une grande tristesse le décès de Pierre Joliot, pionnier de la photosynthèse et figure de la recherche au CNRS. Nos condoléances à sa famille et à ses proches. 👉 insb.cnrs.fr/fr/cnrsinfo/hom…
1
34
4
101
7,803
In this 2025 interview, Hugo Duminil-Copin says he uses LLMs and that they could be useful ('Having an AI to bounce ideas off of can absolutely bring something to the table') although arent't yet. It is only later that he stopped using them. blog.mathieuacher.com/AIScie…
1
2
232
Replying to @GruPiotr
Not saying you are wrong in principle, but it would be more convincing if this guy was some kind of active mathematician, star in the field, and I don't think he is. But clearly AI is super good at piecing together math proofs.
39
For what it's worth, this graph shows limited gains with scaling time at log scale
1
2
35
Replying to @wtgowers
The apparent strength of these predictions seems to come from their largely unbounded nature. The interesting but more difficult thing is to predict the bounds.
61
@kvallier One could also phrase it in essence/accidents vocabulary. If you just go after apparent accidents, you will not recreate the essence from which they should flow - instead, you uncouple the two, like in a sort of Goodhart's Law.
49
being conscious is that it was built on purpose to pretend to be, in the sense of simulating 1st person speech etc. Giving ground would be like: I didn't notice what you did there, I didn't notice all the efforts focused on the appearance. Christians should indeed stick to 0%.2/2
1
3
46
It is not easy to get consciousness in nature. For all we know, there is only one historical, evolutionary lineage of beings that got it. Ants are actually very complex in many ways, and definitely more similar to us than any machine etc. And I think the main objection to AI 1/2
1
2
48
Replying to @rperezmarco
Enflo's Fields medal:
7
166
Marcin J. Suskiewicz retweeted
Daniel Litt
@littmathSep 30
The vibe on here re: AIxMath is kind of apocalyptic, and what’s true is that highly capable AI models have significant impacts on (non-mathematical!) questions around hiring, journals, etc. But if you just log off in fact the day to day of doing math research is really not so different, except that you can talk to your computer about it and sometimes it’s helpful. What does this help look like? In practice high quality math research has never looked like “run a for loop through open conjectures and try to resolve them all,” and it still doesn’t. Most interesting work does not have the form of a problem set, but is rather an open-ended exploration of some phenomenon. There are lots of ways talking to one’s computer can help with this, but I don’t feel particularly worried that it will be automated. After all, it’s a process that is only done when I say it is! Anyway, it’s a great time to be a congenitally calm mathematician.
27
37
3
551
26,706
I would like to think I was and would be sympathetic in such cases too. No hard feelings, sorry if I sounded a bit harsh. I wish you the best.
2
22
dignified decent life and tried to foster those, instead of treating such enclaves as an anomaly to be bulldozed in the name of some kind of "technorealism" or "economic realism", we'd be better off.
1
2
50
Most people I know earn a moderate salary and neither benefit much nor try to evade taxes. You have a right to state what you see as facts, but I think this kind of cold-blooded "realism" is what lets cruel capitalism thrive. If we cherished every enclave where people live 1/2
1
2
47
I don't know where you live, but at least in Europe we don't like people being replaced - be it bakers, artists etc. - and the society has supported, including from taxes, fulfilling jobs, because this is an equally crucial part of lives as health. Jealeousy isn't good. 2/2
1
2
43
I don't know if you want technoutopia to sound attractive, but if yes, you are doing the worst possible job at it. Taking a small group like math where people mostly love their job and constantly telling them they will be 'automated away' sounds like the worst nightmare. 1/2
2
2
53
Marcin J. Suskiewicz retweeted
People on this app don't appreciate how well purely human mathematics is doing. People prove major results literally every few weeks, with proofs that are insightful, beautiful, and solve many problems simultaneously. Currently reading this wonderful thing: arxiv.org/pdf/2608.26392
7
21
1
334
33,376
believe in AI, & I respect that. But if I were to give advice to a young researcher, I'd say: cut out as many distractions as possible (so X & AI too), dig ever deeper into your topic & results, & with ur own experiments (without "physical AGI") you might make a breakthrough. 2/2
27
You might be right, although you must admit it's a strange world in which writers & math'ticians are scolded for opposing AI because "it might cure cancer," but VCs aren't scolded for refusing to invest their excess money in actual cancer research, etc. You seem to sincerely 1/2
2
32
would probably have been developed open-source within the next decade anyway. Imagine if war-effort-scale investments went instead to preclinical studies & large-scale clinical trials... No, there's little evidence for these promises if one stops listening to the PR. 2/2
18
I'm a researcher, & I strongly disagree. We've come a long way in cancer prevention & treatment, but if anything, progress now seems hindered by decreased funding & a massive reorientation of investment & attention away from real research toward moderately useful software that1/2
2
33